Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W289447111> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W289447111 startingPage "142" @default.
- W289447111 abstract "Appearing in Winter 2006 issue of Historical Journal of Massachusetts was an article about identity of Indian word by Marge Bruchac and Peter Thomas. As they explained, word is found in only one place: a July 1663 letter that John Pynchon of Springfield wrote Dutch colony of Rensselaerswyck in Netherland. Pynchon wrote in English, which was then translated into Dutch, but original document has been lost. However, an English text of document exists, published in 1881 by State of York. It opens with following paragraph: This is written your Honors at request of of Agawam, Pajassuck, Nalwetog, Pacomtuck and Wissatinnewag, inform their friends, Dutch, that they are very much put out, because Sowquackick had killed and murdered some of Maquaas [Mohawks]; all above named request herewith, that Dutch Commissaries will believe, that only Sowquackick had been killing Maquaas.1 The Bruchac-Thomas article offers a long argument in an effort locate Wissatinnewag, but it relies almost exclusively on an elaborate, inconclusive linguistic analysis of word itself, without providing any real historical evidence. They conclude that Wissatinnewag was a corruption of Algonquian Indian name for in what is now Berkshire County, Massachusetts. This conclusion is probably incorrect. Whether or not Pynchon was familiar with Dutch or Indian languages is immaterial because there was no Indian community on Housatonic River of Massachusetts in 1663. On that account alone, Bruchac-Thomas argument is not particularly convincing when other factors are considered. A better approach is an examination of historical context in which Pynchon wrote his letter. By 1656 he and his father had established Indian fur trading posts at Springfield and on Westfield River.2 In 1661 John began trading on Housatonic River with Mohicans from Hudson River Valley but that endeavor proved unsuccessful and was abandoned next year.3 By 1663, there were no living year-round on Housatonic. The Mohicans of Hudson River followed a seasonal lifestyle in seventeenth century and visited their traditional hunting grounds in western Massachusetts only for two-month periods in fall and winter.4 John Pynchon acted as agent for of Connecticut River Valley, those whom he called our Indians. He had no jurisdiction over Mohicans of Hudson Valley, known then as Albany Indians and later as New York Indians. Thus he had no authority in 1663 petition Dutch in favor of any on Housatonic. They would have sent their petitions directly Dutch authorities.5 Even if Bruchac and Thomas could establish presence of Mohicans at Housatonic in July 1663, then it would make no sense for that tribe enlist aid of Pynchon for protection from Mohawks. Mohicans and Mohawks were at war with each other in 1663 and it seems unlikely that former would be requesting that their enemies not attack them for murders committed by Sowquackicks.6 Within body of Pynchon' s letter are two phrases that offer significant clues location of Wissatinnewag. Pynchon begins by mentioning five tribes or locations: Agawam (Springfield), Pajassuck (Westfield), Nalwetog (Northampton), Pocumtuck (Deerfield), and mysterious Wissatinnewag. In his second paragraph, he refers to other of Caneticot [Connecticut] river, as Pacomtuck, Nanatan, Agawam and further down. Later he describes the Southern of Pacomtuck and Agawam and farther South.7 Since Pynchon had no agency over on Housatonic, he was representing only those tribes on Connecticut River. These phrases then suggest that Wissatinnewag was on that river south of Agawam and within jurisdiction of Massachusetts Bay Colony. …" @default.
- W289447111 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W289447111 creator A5041561839 @default.
- W289447111 date "2007-07-01" @default.
- W289447111 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
- W289447111 title "Locating Wissatinnewag: A Second Opinion" @default.
- W289447111 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W289447111 type Work @default.
- W289447111 sameAs 289447111 @default.
- W289447111 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W289447111 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W289447111 hasAuthorship W289447111A5041561839 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C2777206241 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W289447111 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C107038049 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C11413529 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C138885662 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C144024400 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C166957645 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C17744445 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C185592680 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C199539241 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C2777206241 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C2778355321 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C2779343474 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C41008148 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C41895202 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C48103436 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C55493867 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C74916050 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C95457728 @default.
- W289447111 hasConceptScore W289447111C98184364 @default.
- W289447111 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W289447111 hasLocation W2894471111 @default.
- W289447111 hasOpenAccess W289447111 @default.
- W289447111 hasPrimaryLocation W2894471111 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W1593612493 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W162024303 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W16806651 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2050804015 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2053933610 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2095769778 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2097163221 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2109442680 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2204229239 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2319664238 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2327202516 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2511601407 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2599914318 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W2992101591 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W299313860 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W340644485 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W341978348 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W427052625 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W815014104 @default.
- W289447111 hasRelatedWork W843748354 @default.
- W289447111 hasVolume "35" @default.
- W289447111 isParatext "false" @default.
- W289447111 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W289447111 magId "289447111" @default.
- W289447111 workType "article" @default.