FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894561521> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894561521 endingPage "3179" @default.
• W2894561521 startingPage "3169" @default.
• W2894561521 abstract "Research Article| October 02, 2018 Conditional Probability of What? Example of the Nankai Interface in Japan Delphine D. Fitzenz Delphine D. Fitzenz aRMS, 7575 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, California 94560, delphine.fitzenz@rms.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (6): 3169–3179. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180016 Article history first online: 02 Oct 2018 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Delphine D. Fitzenz; Conditional Probability of What? Example of the Nankai Interface in Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2018;; 108 (6): 3169–3179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180016 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of the Seismological Society of America Search Advanced Search Abstract When the timing of the most recent event on a fault is known and when quasi‐periodicity is inferred, it is customary to require time‐dependent conditional probabilities for that fault. A lot of applications rely on these numbers, including emergency planning, prioritizing retrofits, (re‐)insurance pricing, and reserve setting. For very simple fault network geometries and faulting behaviors, the question “conditional probability of what?” is easily answered. It is the probability of the characteristic full‐segment event on that fault. However, for either more complex fault networks or more complex faulting behaviors, it is not as easy. We propose a method for building a recurrence model for megathrust events on the Nankai interface in Japan. Historically, this interface has ruptured every 150 yrs on average either in individual large earthquakes spanning the whole region from Tokai in the northeast to the western edge of the Nankai segment or even into the Hyuganada region (1707‐type events) or in clusters of two adjacent earthquakes (Nankai–Tonankai, e.g., 1944–1946). The method analyzes the family of events that can reset stresses on the fault and makes use of the earthquake history, convergence rate, and inferred megathrust slip per event. The first step calculates the probability for large events to happen on the Nankai interface. The second step assigns relative weights to the possible scenarios. The last step proposes an intracluster distribution for interevent times when the “event” is a cluster of two large adjacent earthquakes. It is developed to be a more self‐consistent analysis than one that would look at the recurrence of large earthquakes on each segment independently. Similar approaches might be useful in other settings where the most constrained conditional probability might be that for any of a series of possible stress resetting events across a number of faults, fault strands, or fault segments. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access." @default.
• W2894561521 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894561521 creator A5036414612 @default.
• W2894561521 date "2018-10-02" @default.
• W2894561521 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2894561521 title "Conditional Probability of What? Example of the Nankai Interface in Japan" @default.
• W2894561521 cites W1552014533 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W1652759484 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W194111627 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2025437017 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2034383803 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2051890859 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2091713480 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2111986227 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2117738563 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2138470268 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2149477794 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2149538179 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2163469456 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2262689777 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2293287465 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2340120485 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2771253598 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2782469507 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W2916128070 @default.
• W2894561521 cites W392002362 @default.
• W2894561521 doi "https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180016" @default.
• W2894561521 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894561521 type Work @default.
• W2894561521 sameAs 2894561521 @default.
• W2894561521 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2894561521 countsByYear W28945615212020 @default.
• W2894561521 countsByYear W28945615212021 @default.
• W2894561521 countsByYear W28945615212022 @default.
• W2894561521 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894561521 hasAuthorship W2894561521A5036414612 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C2779662365 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C2780154274 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C44492722 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C105795698 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C121332964 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C136764020 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C23123220 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C2778805511 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C2779662365 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C2780154274 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C33923547 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C41008148 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C44492722 @default.
• W2894561521 hasConceptScore W2894561521C62520636 @default.
• W2894561521 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2894561521 hasLocation W28945615211 @default.
• W2894561521 hasOpenAccess W2894561521 @default.
• W2894561521 hasPrimaryLocation W28945615211 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W2064864137 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W2226303319 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W2365248444 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W2575822034 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W2694207508 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W4239087487 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W4285709146 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W4291722174 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W4382602469 @default.
• W2894561521 hasRelatedWork W2183842793 @default.
• W2894561521 hasVolume "108" @default.
• W2894561521 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894561521 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894561521 magId "2894561521" @default.
• W2894561521 workType "article" @default.