FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894619788> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894619788 endingPage "E469" @default.
• W2894619788 startingPage "E465" @default.
• W2894619788 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A multicenter retrospective study. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare pelvic obliquity correction and reoperation rate in neuromuscular scoliosis patients who had their pelvis included in a posterior spinal fusion (pelvic fusion, PF) at their index procedure versus revision procedures. Summary of Background Data. There is limited information on outcomes specific to fusing to the pelvis for neuromuscular scoliosis in a revision operation versus index surgery. Methods. Charts and radiographs were reviewed of patients with PF for neuromuscular scoliosis from January 2003 to August 2015 at four high-volume pediatric spine centers with >2 year follow-up. Results. Two hundred eighty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 271 had PF done at index surgery and 14 had PF done during revision surgery. Before index procedure, there were no significant differences in Cobb angle (P = 0.13). Before PF, there was no difference in pelvic obliquity (P = 0.26). At the time of fusion to the pelvis, estimated blood loss (P = 0.23) and operative time (P = 0.43) did not differ between index and revision groups. Percent correction in pelvic obliquity was similar for both groups (P = 0.72). Overall, 69 patients had complications requiring return to the operating room. Excluding the revision surgery for inclusion of the pelvis for the revision group, there was still a lower reoperation rate with index PF (22.9%, n = 62/271) than revision PF (50.0%, n = 7/14) (P = 0.02). Implant failures were significantly higher in the revision group (index = 7.4%, 20/271; revision = 42.9%, 6/14; P < 0.001). Conclusion. PF at the index spinal fusion led to similar correction of pelvic obliquity with approximately half the reoperation rate compared with PF at a revision surgery. Operative time and blood loss were similar between index and revision spinal fusion. Level of Evidence: 4 Pelvic fusion at index spinal fusion led to similar correction of pelvic obliquity with half the reoperation rate compared to PF at revision surgery. While we would intuitively think that extension to the pelvis is a relatively small procedure, operative time and blood loss were similar to the index fusion." @default.
• W2894619788 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5008339280 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5032282324 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5037553987 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5045922910 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5051480314 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5058748383 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5070073657 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5080204273 @default.
• W2894619788 creator A5081634365 @default.
• W2894619788 date "2019-04-15" @default.
• W2894619788 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2894619788 title "Don’t You Wish You Had Fused to the Pelvis the First Time" @default.
• W2894619788 cites W1518217927 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W1963766787 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W1974676110 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W1982816413 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W1984420928 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W1994904930 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2006607161 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2008923322 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2009871982 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2031253949 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2032285595 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2062908091 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2085906638 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2087525893 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2316447347 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2322048290 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2333684021 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2337162189 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W2400139795 @default.
• W2894619788 cites W4241408277 @default.
• W2894619788 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002888" @default.
• W2894619788 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30299416" @default.
• W2894619788 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2894619788 type Work @default.
• W2894619788 sameAs 2894619788 @default.
• W2894619788 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2894619788 countsByYear W28946197882019 @default.
• W2894619788 countsByYear W28946197882020 @default.
• W2894619788 countsByYear W28946197882021 @default.
• W2894619788 countsByYear W28946197882022 @default.
• W2894619788 countsByYear W28946197882023 @default.
• W2894619788 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5008339280 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5032282324 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5037553987 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5045922910 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5051480314 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5058748383 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5070073657 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5080204273 @default.
• W2894619788 hasAuthorship W2894619788A5081634365 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C2778357063 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C2778871979 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C2780955175 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C141071460 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C142724271 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C167135981 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C204787440 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C2775998654 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C2778357063 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C2778871979 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C2780375110 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C2780907711 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C2780955175 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C36454342 @default.
• W2894619788 hasConceptScore W2894619788C71924100 @default.
• W2894619788 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2894619788 hasLocation W28946197881 @default.
• W2894619788 hasOpenAccess W2894619788 @default.
• W2894619788 hasPrimaryLocation W28946197881 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W1965295613 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W1971840052 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W2046547018 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W2057268812 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W2328618146 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W2412031658 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W2894619788 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W3035036956 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W4376116177 @default.
• W2894619788 hasRelatedWork W4379422147 @default.
• W2894619788 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2894619788 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894619788 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894619788 magId "2894619788" @default.
• W2894619788 workType "article" @default.