FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894680519> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894680519 abstract "High-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is superficial; nonetheless, it is an aggressive cancer. Proper management strategy selection following transurethral resection between bladder preservation (BP) and radical cystectomy (RC) could result in delayed or excessive treatment. Hence, selecting the optimal treatment modality remains controversial to date. We searched MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database through 12 April 2018. Quality and publication bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Begg’s/Egger’s test. We collected 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year survival rate and hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Using the Review Manager 5.2 software, we used the odds ratio (OR) of specific years and HR for meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed by the original tumor state, radical cystectomy timing, bladder preservation modality, and age. In total, 11 cohorts with 1735 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. All OR of OS supported BP as a better treatment option; however, all OR of PFS had no significant differences. As for CSS, only the 15-year OR reflected a statistical significance preferring RC. Subgroup analysis showed that BP is more appropriate for patients older than 65 and G3 tumor. Limited data demonstrated that late RC (> 3 months) is more effective compared to early RC (< 3 months) and intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin was not statistically different from that of RC. The mixed BP modalities were significantly better compared to RC in OS and worse in CSS, with both having a very low evidence strength. BP is a superior treatment modality compare to RC, especially for older patients and T1G3 or lower grade tumors. However, the superior BP modality was unclear. Conversely, RC could be a better option for younger patients. More specifically, late RC may be more beneficial but had a very-low-level of evidence. Quality of life should be considered equal to survival outcome; hence, post-treatment follow-up needs to be performed. Prospective randomized studies should be performed to overcome the limitations of this meta-analysis study. Registration ID is CRD42018093491 ." @default.
• W2894680519 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894680519 creator A5011115732 @default.
• W2894680519 creator A5019737797 @default.
• W2894680519 creator A5036238279 @default.
• W2894680519 creator A5088666120 @default.
• W2894680519 date "2018-10-02" @default.
• W2894680519 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2894680519 title "Bladder preservation approach versus radical cystectomy for high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies" @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1532789289 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1539203651 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1604890764 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1606117260 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1964185454 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1965779867 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1993216782 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W1996468433 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2000837090 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2003233926 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2008523684 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2008782229 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2017802509 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2019402498 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2031736835 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2037602993 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2042426196 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2044665836 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2050256434 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2053365571 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2056247168 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2057942073 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2058331779 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2073259182 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2079542321 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2080696159 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2083575203 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2099815527 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2108974158 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2110661995 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2111078038 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2113156769 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2116299167 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2122864670 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2125320293 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2129198262 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2132951532 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2134589781 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W229384513 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2413337224 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2414081795 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2443056117 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2527824850 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2560455424 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2601029645 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2604669485 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W272536734 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2736801117 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2747233785 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W2893221704 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W34432028 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W4206554793 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W4247641510 @default.
• W2894680519 cites W4302588583 @default.
• W2894680519 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1497-0" @default.
• W2894680519 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6169022" @default.
• W2894680519 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30285788" @default.
• W2894680519 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894680519 type Work @default.
• W2894680519 sameAs 2894680519 @default.
• W2894680519 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2894680519 countsByYear W28946805192019 @default.
• W2894680519 countsByYear W28946805192020 @default.
• W2894680519 countsByYear W28946805192021 @default.
• W2894680519 countsByYear W28946805192022 @default.
• W2894680519 countsByYear W28946805192023 @default.
• W2894680519 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894680519 hasAuthorship W2894680519A5011115732 @default.
• W2894680519 hasAuthorship W2894680519A5019737797 @default.
• W2894680519 hasAuthorship W2894680519A5036238279 @default.
• W2894680519 hasAuthorship W2894680519A5088666120 @default.
• W2894680519 hasBestOaLocation W28946805191 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C2775910329 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C2780140570 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C2780352672 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConceptScore W2894680519C121608353 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConceptScore W2894680519C126322002 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConceptScore W2894680519C126894567 @default.
• W2894680519 hasConceptScore W2894680519C141071460 @default.

• next