FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894713748> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894713748 endingPage "959" @default.
• W2894713748 startingPage "939" @default.
• W2894713748 abstract "This article examines the question of who will be subject to ICC jurisdiction with respect to the crime of aggression. One of the most contentious questions in the negotiations regarding the crime of aggression was whether the Court would have jurisdiction over nationals of a state that does not ratify the aggression amendments, but which is alleged to have committed an act of aggression on the territory of a state has accepted the aggression amendments. The question is examined here against the background of the rules in the law of treaties regarding amendments and treaty interpretation. The article considers the legal effect that the resolution of the ICC Assembly of States Parties (ASP), adopted in New York in December 2017 and activating ICC jurisdiction over aggression, will have in determining this jurisdictional question. A resolution of an international conference adopted by consensus can, in principle, be regarded as subsequent practice or a subsequent agreement of the parties to the Rome Statute that establishes the authentic interpretation of the Statute within the meaning of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. It is argued however that this particular resolution does not, in itself, provide the definitive answer as to the correct interpretation of the Rome Statute. Despite being adopted by consensus, and despite being highly relevant for the interpretation of the Rome Statute and Kampala Amendments, this resolution does not necessarily amount to a subsequent agreement or subsequent practice that the Court is legally bound to follow. Nevertheless, it is further argued that the position adopted in New York with regard to the jurisdiction of the Court over nationals of states parties that do not ratify the aggression amendments is the correct legal position and the one that the Court, including the Office of the Prosecutor, ought to adopt. The answer to the question over whom the Court will have jurisdiction with respect to aggression is to be found in Rome rather than in Kampala. We argue that the key to addressing this issue is to understand how the amendment provisions of the Rome Statute work in conjunction with basic principles of the law of treaties." @default.
• W2894713748 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894713748 creator A5049426822 @default.
• W2894713748 creator A5078718810 @default.
• W2894713748 date "2018-08-01" @default.
• W2894713748 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2894713748 title "Treaty Law and ICC Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression" @default.
• W2894713748 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy059" @default.
• W2894713748 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894713748 type Work @default.
• W2894713748 sameAs 2894713748 @default.
• W2894713748 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2894713748 countsByYear W28947137482019 @default.
• W2894713748 countsByYear W28947137482020 @default.
• W2894713748 countsByYear W28947137482021 @default.
• W2894713748 countsByYear W28947137482022 @default.
• W2894713748 countsByYear W28947137482023 @default.
• W2894713748 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894713748 hasAuthorship W2894713748A5049426822 @default.
• W2894713748 hasAuthorship W2894713748A5078718810 @default.
• W2894713748 hasBestOaLocation W28947137481 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C2779010840 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C2779448149 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C144024400 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C15744967 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C17744445 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C199539241 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C2776949292 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C2779010840 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C2779448149 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C73484699 @default.
• W2894713748 hasConceptScore W2894713748C77805123 @default.
• W2894713748 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2894713748 hasLocation W28947137481 @default.
• W2894713748 hasLocation W28947137482 @default.
• W2894713748 hasOpenAccess W2894713748 @default.
• W2894713748 hasPrimaryLocation W28947137481 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W1483045972 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W2059717553 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W242904644 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W3125441650 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W4236662274 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W4239449483 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W4248362681 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W4286111156 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W4312185242 @default.
• W2894713748 hasRelatedWork W2183742747 @default.
• W2894713748 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2894713748 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894713748 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894713748 magId "2894713748" @default.
• W2894713748 workType "article" @default.