FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894719682> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894719682 abstract "A previously published article in this journal reported the service effects from 103 services within the UK Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) initiative and the comparative effectiveness of CBT and Counselling provision. All patients received High-intensity CBT or High-intensity Counselling, but some also received Low-intensity CBT before being stepped-up to High intensity treatments. The report did not distinguish between patients who received low-intensity CBT before being stepped-up. This article clarifies the basis for collapsing low- and high-intensity interventions by analysing the four treatment conditions separately.Data from 33,243 patients included in the second round of the National Audit of Psychological Therapies (NAPT) were re-analysed as four separate conditions: High-intensity CBT only (n = 5975); High-intensity Counselling only (n = 3003); Low-intensity CBT plus High-intensity CBT (n = 17,620); and Low-intensity CBT plus High-intensity Counselling (n = 6645). Analyses considered levels of pre-post therapy effect sizes (ESs), reliable improvement (RI) and reliable and clinically significant improvement (RCSI). Multilevel modelling was used to model predictors of outcome, namely patient pre-post change on PHQ-9 scores at last therapy session.Significant differences obtained on various outcome indices but were so small they carried no clinical significance. Including the four treatment groups in a multilevel model comprising patient intake severity, patient ethnicity and number of sessions attended showed no significant differences between the four treatment groups. Comparisons between the two high-intensity interventions only (N = 8978) indicated Counselling showed more improvement than CBT by 0.3 of a point on PHQ-9 for the mean number of sessions attended. However, this result was moderated by the number of sessions and for 12 or more sessions, the advantage went to CBT.This re-analysis showed no evidence of clinically meaningful differences between the four treatment conditions using standard indices of patient outcomes. However, a differential advantage to high-intensity Counselling for fewer than average sessions attended and high-intensity CBT for more than average sessions attended has important service implications. The finding of equivalent outcomes between high-intensity CBT and Counselling for more severe patients also has important policy implications. Empirically-informed procedures (e.g., predictive modelling) for assigning patients to interventions need to be considered to improve patient outcomes." @default.
• W2894719682 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894719682 creator A5045470491 @default.
• W2894719682 creator A5067226952 @default.
• W2894719682 date "2018-10-03" @default.
• W2894719682 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2894719682 title "The effectiveness of high-intensity CBT and counselling alone and following low-intensity CBT: a reanalysis of the 2nd UK National Audit of Psychological Therapies data" @default.
• W2894719682 cites W2037131080 @default.
• W2894719682 cites W2108187890 @default.
• W2894719682 cites W2112336497 @default.
• W2894719682 cites W2132322340 @default.
• W2894719682 cites W2149697128 @default.
• W2894719682 cites W2621703825 @default.
• W2894719682 cites W2622910293 @default.
• W2894719682 cites W4235813114 @default.
• W2894719682 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1899-0" @default.
• W2894719682 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6171289" @default.
• W2894719682 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30285674" @default.
• W2894719682 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894719682 type Work @default.
• W2894719682 sameAs 2894719682 @default.
• W2894719682 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2894719682 countsByYear W28947196822018 @default.
• W2894719682 countsByYear W28947196822019 @default.
• W2894719682 countsByYear W28947196822021 @default.
• W2894719682 countsByYear W28947196822022 @default.
• W2894719682 countsByYear W28947196822023 @default.
• W2894719682 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894719682 hasAuthorship W2894719682A5045470491 @default.
• W2894719682 hasAuthorship W2894719682A5067226952 @default.
• W2894719682 hasBestOaLocation W28947196821 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C2992879847 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C53059260 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConcept C93038891 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C118552586 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C119857082 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C121332964 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C15744967 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C162324750 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C1862650 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C187736073 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C199521495 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C27415008 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C2992879847 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C41008148 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C53059260 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C62520636 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C70410870 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C71924100 @default.
• W2894719682 hasConceptScore W2894719682C93038891 @default.
• W2894719682 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2894719682 hasLocation W28947196821 @default.
• W2894719682 hasLocation W28947196822 @default.
• W2894719682 hasLocation W28947196823 @default.
• W2894719682 hasLocation W28947196824 @default.
• W2894719682 hasLocation W28947196825 @default.
• W2894719682 hasOpenAccess W2894719682 @default.
• W2894719682 hasPrimaryLocation W28947196821 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W1511586290 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W1599852203 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W194471207 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W1967870126 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W1978193809 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W1988307110 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W2027386447 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W2183628556 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W2610178548 @default.
• W2894719682 hasRelatedWork W3172853445 @default.
• W2894719682 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W2894719682 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894719682 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894719682 magId "2894719682" @default.
• W2894719682 workType "article" @default.