FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894843566> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894843566 endingPage "9" @default.
• W2894843566 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2894843566 abstract "Objective . The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography (LUS) for high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE). Background . LUS has proven to be a reliable tool for the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases, including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and pneumothorax. LUS also has potential for the diagnosis of HAPE. However, the actual diagnostic value of LUS for HAPE is still unknown. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of using LUS for the diagnosis of HAPE. Materials and Methods . A prospective clinical research study of adult HAPE patients was conducted. LUS and chest X-ray (CXR) were performed in patients with suspected HAPE before and after treatment, and pulmonary moist rales were recorded concurrently. The diagnostic value of LUS, CXR, and moist rales for HAPE (i.e., their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) were assessed, and the results were compared. The gold standard was the final diagnosis. Results . In total, 148 patients were enrolled in the study, 126 of which were diagnosed with HAPE (85.14%). Before treatment, the diagnostic accuracy of LUS for HAPE was as follows: sensitivity, 98.41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 100.60–96.23%); specificity, 90.91% (95% CI 102.92–78.90%). LUS had higher sensitivity (0.98 vs. 0.81, <mml:math xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M1><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> using the McNemar test) than moist rales for the diagnosis of HAPE. LUS also had higher sensitivity than CXR (0.98 vs. 0.93, <mml:math xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M2><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> using the McNemar test). After treatment, LUS was consistent with CXR in 96.55% of HAPE patients, and the concordance between LUS and CXR was high ( k statistic = 0.483 <mml:math xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M3><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math>; 95% CI −0.021 to −0.853). Conclusion . The results indicate that LUS is a reliable method for the diagnosis and surveillance of HAPE. This trial is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR-DDD-16009841 )." @default.
• W2894843566 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5008169432 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5022482539 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5043569986 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5060768097 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5061770745 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5074601729 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5075423922 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5082443937 @default.
• W2894843566 creator A5091324151 @default.
• W2894843566 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2894843566 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2894843566 title "Lung Ultrasound Is Accurate for the Diagnosis of High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema: A Prospective Study" @default.
• W2894843566 cites W1481793906 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W1972982277 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W1982834690 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W1986326104 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W1990772876 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2031101304 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2041305925 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2050772041 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2085482820 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2091447471 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2099011354 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2106005648 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2109014886 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2119638066 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2127133949 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2132114460 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2135003818 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2154093108 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2346252207 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2395313212 @default.
• W2894843566 cites W2490868668 @default.
• W2894843566 doi "https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5804942" @default.
• W2894843566 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6188731" @default.
• W2894843566 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30364105" @default.
• W2894843566 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894843566 type Work @default.
• W2894843566 sameAs 2894843566 @default.
• W2894843566 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2894843566 countsByYear W28948435662019 @default.
• W2894843566 countsByYear W28948435662020 @default.
• W2894843566 countsByYear W28948435662021 @default.
• W2894843566 countsByYear W28948435662022 @default.
• W2894843566 countsByYear W28948435662023 @default.
• W2894843566 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5008169432 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5022482539 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5043569986 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5060768097 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5061770745 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5074601729 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5075423922 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5082443937 @default.
• W2894843566 hasAuthorship W2894843566A5091324151 @default.
• W2894843566 hasBestOaLocation W28948435661 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C186282968 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C2776348555 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C2776468924 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C2777714996 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C2777914695 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C2778329176 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C2779882884 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C2992160955 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C105795698 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C11413529 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C126322002 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C126838900 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C186282968 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C188816634 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C2776348555 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C2776468924 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C2777714996 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C2777914695 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C2778329176 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C2779882884 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C2992160955 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C33923547 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C40993552 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C41008148 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C44249647 @default.
• W2894843566 hasConceptScore W2894843566C71924100 @default.
• W2894843566 hasFunder F4320321543 @default.
• W2894843566 hasLocation W28948435661 @default.
• W2894843566 hasLocation W28948435662 @default.
• W2894843566 hasLocation W28948435663 @default.

• next