FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894887832> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894887832 abstract "This session aims to analyze the problem of the relationship between cultural evolution and theory of institutions in the Twentieth century. In this regard, Friedrich von Hayek’s contribution needs mentioning. The illustrious representative of the Austrian School put forward a theory of spontaneous order  resulting in the continuous interaction among individuals. These interactions, even though such an interaction is not tantamount to a specific project, it allows rules to emerge and, ultimately, such conduct is to be adopted by society.  Rules and institutions are therefore the result of procedures, behaviours and moral codes that have settled over time. According to the theorists of the Austrian School, the process of gaining new knowledge includes previous experiences that have rooted in institutions , which come across as an attempt to overcome our ignorance. Our mind, after all, resembles a system that is forced to adapt continuously to the surrounding environment. It is interesting to note how the theory of spontaneous order has allowed scholars to propose a theory of institutions that aim to demonstrate how they bar human action, but also they account for sources of information. To put simply: the relation between unwritten norms (the nomos, as Hayek called it) and legislation is not unidirectional: institutions influence the interactions between individuals and, consequently, the exchange and production of knowledge. The interventions of this session will follow a chronological order. The first one will be focused on the criticism of Carl Menger to those theories of institutions that claim to identify the concept of the common good and to put it at the heart of a social, economic or political institution. Assuming that ethical-political values impact on the economy are the result of the continuous exchange of knowledge and information among individuals, Menger develops two critiques: on the one hand, he posits that the common good cannot be considered the result of a relationship amongst individual. The second paper will focus on the relationship between moral institutions and economic performance starting from the thought of James M. Buchanan. We want to propose the idea that, for Buchanan,  economic constitutionalism can be better defended in the presence of a specific ethical structure that permeates society. According to Buchanan, in fact, there is a close relationship between social customs and economic development. We can therefore contend that a strong cultural identity, which  characterises small social units, determines a better relationship between citizens and governments. Cultural identity determines a greater 'communion of intentions' between rulers and the governed and such quicker 'communion' makes decision making quicker and more transparent. To make this case much more compelling, some little-known Buchanan articles will be  analysed, like those about Japan. Japanese society would have been able to maintain strong moral values (spirit of sacrifice, frugality, respect for authority, etc.) that favourably reflected on its development its economic development. Generally speaking, the decline of such values in the West would contribute to causing adversities. The third paper follows the evolutionary institutionalism of Hodgson, Knudsen and Witt. It presents a proposal of human free will within the boundaries of the Darwinian framework. The argument consists in a way to think to the intentional human intervention as just an element of the environment into which the evolutionary process takes place. Vice versa, the paper excludes that the free human will directly intervenes in the process itself." @default.
• W2894887832 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894887832 creator A5038737484 @default.
• W2894887832 creator A5052787910 @default.
• W2894887832 creator A5075792502 @default.
• W2894887832 date "2018-06-25" @default.
• W2894887832 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2894887832 title "The Evolutionary economics between Ethics and Institutional Theory." @default.
• W2894887832 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894887832 type Work @default.
• W2894887832 sameAs 2894887832 @default.
• W2894887832 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2894887832 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894887832 hasAuthorship W2894887832A5038737484 @default.
• W2894887832 hasAuthorship W2894887832A5052787910 @default.
• W2894887832 hasAuthorship W2894887832A5075792502 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C181111096 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C25343380 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C2778732403 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C10138342 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C111472728 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C118084267 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C121332964 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C138885662 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C144024400 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C162324750 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C17744445 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C181111096 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C182306322 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C190253527 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C199539241 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C25343380 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C2778732403 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C2780791683 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C41008148 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C62520636 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C77088390 @default.
• W2894887832 hasConceptScore W2894887832C7991579 @default.
• W2894887832 hasLocation W28948878321 @default.
• W2894887832 hasOpenAccess W2894887832 @default.
• W2894887832 hasPrimaryLocation W28948878321 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W1565595765 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W1583649813 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W1584196094 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W1969437501 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W1985382008 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2027820648 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2131144005 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2144789065 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2175226253 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2343286927 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2504815301 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W257066517 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2602527366 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2610251263 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2790411400 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2937693987 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W2985510783 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W3122545161 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W3147634070 @default.
• W2894887832 hasRelatedWork W936551230 @default.
• W2894887832 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894887832 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894887832 magId "2894887832" @default.
• W2894887832 workType "article" @default.