FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894896729> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894896729 startingPage "4068" @default.
• W2894896729 abstract "Comparing the human genome project with reconstruction of the Dead Sea Scrolls manifests more differences than similarities. Even though both are scientific projects, they each belong to a very different discipline, seek divergent objectives, and use distinctmethodologies. The two projects are essentially similar, however, in that they seek to reveal a single truth. This fundamentally identical purpose and claim of both projects, I would argue, should affect the scope of rights rendered to scientists. The nature of scientific projects and the essence of scientific claims, as such, are central for the intellectual property analysis.Comparing the apparently dissimilar projects demonstrates the most extremist ramifications of the Dead Sea Scrolls decision. What is the nature of the scientific project, and what should be the role of proprietary rights in this endeavor? To what extent should a scientist be permitted to acquire proprietary rights in his or her research? The legal dispute over the feasibility of proprietary rights in the reconstruction of the ancient Dead Sea Scrolls challenges the tenets of intellectual property law such as the notions of creativity, authorship, originality, and progress. A close reading of the case further contests our beliefs regarding the boundaries between the arts and sciences, discovery and creation, and deciphering a text and translating it. It calls for examining the boundaries between proprietary rights and public domain in scholarly research. I would like to use the Dead Sea Scrolls case as an opportunity to explore these thoughts and beliefs which intrinsically shape our copyright doctrine.Nimmer’s phenomenal monograph provides an exceptional glimpse into one of the most dramatic cases ever tried in the history of copyright law. His insightful and poetic analysis of the Dead Sea Scrolls case covers its many layers. Alongside the legal analysis, Nimmer portrays the historical background, thenational and ethnic tensions, the professional ambitions, the mixed motives and desires, the personas (scholars, publishers, lawyers), and the organizations and institutions who took part in this drama. This rich, in-depth description of the dispute offers an alternative narrative to the one portrayed by the Israeli Supreme Court, thus unveiling some of the underlying assumptions that shaped the Court’s decision and offering some fresh insights regarding the dispute.In this Comment I focus on what I believe is a fundamental error in the Court’s legal analysis which led the Court to mistakenly extend copyright protection to a scientific achievement. I argue that the Court erred in confusing two distinct copyright standards: one is the originality test and the other is the idea/expression dichotomy. Applying the originality test to ideas unprotected by copyright law led both the District Court and the Supreme Court to uphold a scientific work as a copyrightable subject matter.20 I will offer some explanations for this error and discuss the ramifications of this decision to thescientific project." @default.
• W2894896729 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894896729 creator A5079566250 @default.
• W2894896729 date "2001-06-01" @default.
• W2894896729 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2894896729 title "Of Scientific Claims and Proprietary Rights: Lessons from the Dead Seas Scrolls Case" @default.
• W2894896729 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2894896729 type Work @default.
• W2894896729 sameAs 2894896729 @default.
• W2894896729 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2894896729 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894896729 hasAuthorship W2894896729A5079566250 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C11012388 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C194105502 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C2776950860 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C509904864 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C512654426 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C65264089 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C70789860 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C11012388 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C124952713 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C142362112 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C144024400 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C166957645 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C17744445 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C194105502 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C199360897 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C199539241 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C2776211767 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C2776950860 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C2778012447 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C34974158 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C41008148 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C509904864 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C512654426 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C554936623 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C65264089 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C70789860 @default.
• W2894896729 hasConceptScore W2894896729C95457728 @default.
• W2894896729 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2894896729 hasLocation W28948967291 @default.
• W2894896729 hasOpenAccess W2894896729 @default.
• W2894896729 hasPrimaryLocation W28948967291 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W1557587096 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W1572278818 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W1796023171 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W1956833285 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W2098392350 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W2601352602 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W2605348713 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W2765209481 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W2898425326 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W2954589106 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W3122535951 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W3123227332 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W3124065248 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W3124311743 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W3125064359 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W3125451397 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W3162154867 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W86923779 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W1918053274 @default.
• W2894896729 hasRelatedWork W97270655 @default.
• W2894896729 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2894896729 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894896729 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894896729 magId "2894896729" @default.
• W2894896729 workType "article" @default.