FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894977470> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894977470 endingPage "110" @default.
• W2894977470 startingPage "87" @default.
• W2894977470 abstract "No AccessSep 2018Knowledge Transfers from International Openness in Trade and Investment: The European CaseAuthors/Editors: David Michael GouldDavid Michael GouldSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1157-9_ch2AboutView ChaptersFull TextPDF (0.2 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract: Reviews the role of international trade, foreign investment, and global value chains (GVCs) in transferring knowledge that helps to improve productivity in Europe and Central Asia (ECA) countries. While trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) offer significant opportunities for firms to increase their productivity through technology transfers, an important technology-diffusion channel in the European Union (EU) is through production sharing through GVCs, which can encompass both trade and FDI. The global economic crisis reduced international trade, slowing down EU firms’ engagement in GVCs, and the benefit that EU firms derived from cross-border knowledge flows fell, which made an important contribution to the decline in productivity growth in the region. This underlines the importance of maintaining open policies toward foreign trade and investment to support the productivity growth of firms. Spotlights the role of deep preferential trade agreements (PTAs) in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI). ReferencesAghion, P and P Howitt. 2006. “Joseph Schumpeter Lecture: Appropriate Growth Policy; A Unifying Framework.” Journal of the European Economic Association 4 (2–3): 269–314. CrossrefGoogle ScholarAmann, E and S Virmani. 2014. “Foreign Direct Investment and Reverse Technology Spillovers: The Effect on Total Factor Productivity.” OECD Journal: Economic Studies 2014: 129–53. CrossrefGoogle ScholarAmiti, M and J Konings. 2007. “Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia.” American Economic Review 97 (5): 1611–38. CrossrefGoogle ScholarArkolakis, C and M Muendler. 2010. “The Extensive Margin of Exporting Products: A Firm-Level Analysis.” NBER Working Paper 16641, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://aida.econ.yale.edu/˜ka265/research/MultiProduct/Arkolakis_Muendler_products.pdf. Google ScholarArnold, M J and B S Javorcik. 2009. “Gifted Kids or Pushy Parents? Foreign Direct Investment and Plant Productivity in Indonesia.” Journal of International Economics 79 (1): 42–53. CrossrefGoogle ScholarArnold, J M, B S Javorcik, M Lipscomb, and A Mattoo. 2010. “Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India.” Discussion Paper DP8011, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. Google ScholarArnold, M J, B S Javorcik, and A Mattoo. 2007. “Does Services Liberalization Benefit Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic.” Policy Research Working Paper 4109, World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6882. Google ScholarAudretsch, D and M P Feldman. 1996. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review 86 (3): 630–40. Google ScholarAw, B Y, M J Roberts, and T Winston. 2007. “Export Market Participation, Investments in R&D and Worker Training, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity.” World Economy 30 (1): 83–104. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00873.x. CrossrefGoogle ScholarBartelsman, E J, J Haltiwanger, and S Scarpetta. 2004. “Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries.” Discussion Paper 1374, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn, Germany. Google ScholarBartelsman, E J, J Haltiwanger, and S Scarpetta. 2013. “Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection.” American Economic Review 103 (1): 305–34. CrossrefGoogle ScholarBastos, P and J Silva. 2010. “The Quality of a Firm’s Exports: Where You Export to Matters.” Journal of International Economics 82 (2): 99–111. CrossrefGoogle ScholarBenli, M 2016. “Productivity Spillovers from FDI in Turkey: Evidence from Quantile Regressions.” Theoretical and Applied Economics 3 (608): 177–96. Google ScholarBernard, A B, J B Jensen, and P K Schott. 2005. “Importers, Exporters, and Multinationals: A Portrait of Firms in the U.S. that Trade Goods.” NBER Working Paper 11404, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11404. Google ScholarBlalock, G and P J Gertler. 2008. “Welfare Gains from Foreign Direct Investment through Technology Transfer to Local Suppliers.” Journal of International Economics 74 (2): 402–21. CrossrefGoogle ScholarBloom, N, K Manova, J Van Reenen, S Sun, and Z Yu. 2018. “Managing Trade: Evidence from China and the US.” NBER Working Paper 24718, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarBloom, N and J Van Reenen. 2002. “Patents, Real Options and Firm Performance.” Economic Journal 112: C97–C116. CrossrefGoogle ScholarBøler, E A, A Moxnes, and K H Ulltveit-Moe. 2015. “R&D, International Sourcing and the Joint Impact on Firm Performance.” American Economic Review 105 (12): 3660–703. CrossrefGoogle ScholarBrambilla, I, R Dix-Carneiro, D Lederman, and G Porto. 2012. “Skills, Exports and the Wages of Seven Million Latin American Workers.” World Bank Economic Review 26 (1): 36–60. LinkGoogle ScholarBrandt, L, G T Rawski, and J Sutton. 2008. “China’s Industrial Development.” In China’s Great Economic Transformation, ed. Brandt, L and G T Rawski, 593–604. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://kczx.xhu.edu.cn/G2S/eWebEditor/uploadfile/20120427135908_684449439144.pdf. CrossrefGoogle ScholarBustos, P 2011. “Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms.” American Economic Review 101 (1): 304–40. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCagé, J and D Rouzet. 2015. “Improving ‘National Brands’: Reputation for Quality and Export Promotion Strategies.” Journal of International Economics 95 (2): 274–90. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCaliendo, L, F Monte, and E Rossi-Hansberg. 2015. “The Anatomy of French Production Hierarchies.” Journal of Political Economy 123 (4): 809–52. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCaliendo, L and E Rossi-Hansberg. 2012. “The Impact of Trade on Organization and Productivity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1393–1467. http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/04/13/qje.qjs016.abstract. CrossrefGoogle ScholarChiacchio, F, K Gradeva, and P Lopez-Garcia. 2018. “The Post-crisis TFP Growth Slowdown in CEE Countries: Exploring the Role of Global Value Chains.” Working Paper 2143, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany. Google ScholarCirera, Xavier and William F Maloney. 2017. The Innovation Paradox: Developing-Country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-Up. Washington, DC: World Bank. LinkGoogle ScholarCoe, N M, P Dicken, and M Hess. 2008. “Global Production Networks: Realizing the Potential.” Journal of Economic Geography 8 (3): 271–95. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCoe, D T and E Helpman. 1995. “International R&D Spillovers.” European Economic Review 39 (5): 859–87. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCohen, W M and D A Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D.” Economic Journal 99: 569–96. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCohen, W M and D A Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–52. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCohen, W M and D A Levinthal. 1994. “Innovation Fortune Favours the Prepared Firm.” Management Science 40 (2): 227–51. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCrespi, Gustavo, Chiara Criscuolo, Jonathan E Haskel, and Matthew Slaughter. 2008. “Productivity Growth, Knowledge Flows, and Spillovers.” NBER Working Paper 13959, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCriscuolo, C and R Martin. 2009. “Multinationals and U.S. Productivity Leadership: Evidence from Great Britain.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (2): 263–81. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCriscuolo, Paola and Bart Verspagen. 2008. “Does It Matter Where Patent Citations Come From? Inventor vs. Examiner Citations in European Patents.” Research Policy 37 (10): 1892–908. CrossrefGoogle ScholarDe Loecker, J 2013. “A Note on Detecting Learning by Exporting.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 5 (3): 1–21. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.5.3.1. CrossrefGoogle ScholarDjankov, S and B Hoekman. 2000. “Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises.” World Bank Economic Review 14 (1): 49–64. LinkGoogle ScholarDuggan, V, S Rahardja, and G Varela. 2013. “Service Sector Reform and Manufacturing Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia.” Policy Research Working Paper 6349, World Bank, Washington, DC. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2210300. Google ScholarEslava, M, J Tybout, D Jinkins, C Krizan, and J Eaton. 2015. “A Search and Learning Model of Export Dynamics.” Paper presented at 2015 Annual Meeting, Society for Economic Dynamics, Warsaw, June 25–27. Google ScholarFeenstra, R C and G H Hanson. 1996. “Globalization, Outsourcing, and Wage Inequality.” American Economic Review 86 (2): 240–45. Google ScholarFernandes, A and C Paunov. 2012. “Foreign Direct Investment in Services and Manufacturing Productivity: Evidence for Chile.” Journal of Development Economics 97 (2): 305–21. CrossrefGoogle ScholarFieler, A, M Eslava, and D Y Xu. 2018. “Trade, Technology and Input Linkages: A Theory with Evidence from Colombia.” American Economic Review. 108 (1): 109–46 CrossrefGoogle ScholarFitzgerald, D, S Haller, and Y Yedid-Levi. 2015. How Exporters Grow. Staff Report 524, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN. Google ScholarGirma, S and K Wakelin. 2007. “Local Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment in the U.K. Electronics Industry.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 37 (3): 399–412. CrossrefGoogle ScholarGoldberg, P, A M Khandelwal, N Pavcnikh, and P Topalova. 2010. “Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (4): 1727–67. CrossrefGoogle ScholarGriffith, R, S J Redding, and H Simpson. 2002. “Productivity Convergence and Foreign Ownership at the Establishment Level.” Discussion Paper 3765, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. https://ssrn.com/abstract=388802. Google ScholarGriffith, R, S J Redding, and J Van Reenen. 2004. “Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Countries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (4): 883–95. CrossrefGoogle ScholarGriliches, Zvi. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 92–116. CrossrefGoogle ScholarGrossman, Gene M and Elhanan Helpman. 1991. “Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth.” European Economic Review 35 (2–3): 517–26. CrossrefGoogle ScholarGrossman, Gene M and E Rossi-Hansberg. 2008. “Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring.” American Economic Review 98 (5): 1978–97. CrossrefGoogle ScholarGuadalupe, M, O Kuzmina, and C Thomas. 2012. “Innovation and Foreign Ownership.” American Economic Review 102 (7): 3594–27. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v102y2012i7p3594-3627.html [Accessed November 14, 2015]. CrossrefGoogle ScholarHalpern, L, M Koren, and A Szeidl. 2015. “Imported Inputs and Productivity.” American Economic Review 105 (12): 3660–703. CrossrefGoogle ScholarHaskel, J, S Pereira, and M J Slaughter. 2007. “Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms?” Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (3): 482–96. CrossrefGoogle ScholarHummels, D and A Skiba. 2004. “Shipping the Good Apples Out? An Empirical Confirmation of the Alchian-Allen Conjecture.” Journal of Political Economy 112 (6): 1384–402. CrossrefGoogle ScholarIacovone, L and G A Crespi. 2010. “Catching Up with the Technological Frontier: Micro-level Evidence on Growth and Convergence.” Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (6): 2073–96. CrossrefGoogle ScholarIršová, Z and T Havránek. 2013. “Determinants of Horizontal Spillovers from FDI: Evidence from a Large Meta-analysis.” World Development 42 (C): 1–15. CrossrefGoogle ScholarJaffe, Adam B and M Trajtenberg. 2005. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarJaffe, A, M Trajtenberg, and R Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577–98. CrossrefGoogle ScholarJavorcik, B S 2004. “Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages.” American Economic Review 94 (3): 605–27. CrossrefGoogle ScholarJavorcik, B S, K Saggi, and M Spatareanu. 2004. “Does It Matter Where You Come From? Vertical Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment and the Nationality of Investors.” Policy Research Working Paper 3449, World Bank, Washington, DC. https://ssrn.com/abstract=625327. Google ScholarKasahara, H and B Lapham. 2013. “Productivity and the Decision to Import and Export: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of International Economics 89 (2): 297–316. CrossrefGoogle ScholarKee, H L 2015. “Local Intermediate Inputs and the Shared Supplier Spillovers of Foreign Direct Investment.” Journal of Development Economics 112 (C): 56–71. CrossrefGoogle ScholarKeller, W and S R Yeaple. 2009. “Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (4): 821–31. CrossrefGoogle ScholarKogut, B and S J Chang. 1991. “Technological Capabilities and Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics 73 (3): 401–13. CrossrefGoogle ScholarKonings, J 2001. “The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms.” Economics of Transition 9 (3): 619–33. CrossrefGoogle ScholarKoren, M and M Csillag. 2011. “Machines and Machinists: Capital-Skill Complementarity from an International Trade Perspective.” IEHAS Discussion Paper MT-DP - 2011/14. Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. http://ideas.repec.org/p/has/discpr/1114.html. Google ScholarLipsey, R E 2004. “Home and Host Country Effects of FDI.” In Challenges to Globalization, ed. Baldwin, Robert E and L Alan Winters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle ScholarLopez-Garcia, P, F di Mauro, and the CompNet Taskforce. 2015. “Assessing European Competitiveness: The New CompNet Microbased Database.” Working Paper 1764, European Central Bank, Frankfurt. Google ScholarLopez-Garcia, P and J M Montero. 2012. “Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity in the Decision to Innovate of Spanish Firms: The Role of Human Capital.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 21 (7): 589–612. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMacGarvie, M 2006. “Do Firms Learn from International Trade?” Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (1): 46–60. CrossrefGoogle ScholarManova, K and Z Zhang. 2012. “Export Prices across Firms and Destinations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (1): 379–436. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMartin, J 2012. “Markups, Quality, and Transport Costs.” European Economic Review 56 (4): 777–91. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMatsuyama, K 2007. “Beyond Icebergs: Towards a Theory of Biased Globalization.” Review of Economic Studies 74 (1): 237–53. CrossrefGoogle ScholarRamondo, N 2009. “Foreign Plants and Industry Productivity: Evidence from Chile.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111 (4): 789–809. CrossrefGoogle ScholarSaia, A, D Andrews, and S Albrizio. 2015. “Productivity Spillovers from the Global Frontier and Public Policy: Industry-Level Evidence.” Economics Department Working Paper 1238, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Google ScholarSchott, P K 2008. “The Relative Sophistication of Chinese Exports.” Economic Policy 23: 5–49. CrossrefGoogle ScholarŞeker, M 2012. “Importing, Exporting, and Innovation in Developing Countries.” Review of International Economics 20 (2): 299–314. CrossrefGoogle ScholarSilajdzic, S and E Mehic. 2015. “Knowledge Spillovers, Absorptive Capacities and the Impact of FDI on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Transition Economies.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 195 (3): 614–23. CrossrefGoogle ScholarSutton, J 2007. “Quality, Trade and the Moving Window: The Globalisation Process.” Economic Journal 117 (524): F469–98. CrossrefGoogle ScholarTang, J and R Altshuler. 2015. “The Spillover Effects of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Home Countries: Evidence from the United States.” Working Paper 1503, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2545129. Google Scholarvan der Wiel, H, H Creusen, G van Leeuwen, and E van der Pijll. 2008. “Cross Your Border and Look Around.” Paper presented at the Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade (DEGIT) Conference, Manila. Google Scholarvan Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B and F Lichtenberg. 2001. “Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology across Borders?” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (3): 490–97. CrossrefGoogle ScholarVerhoogen, E A 2008. “Trade, Quality Upgrading, and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2): 489–530. CrossrefGoogle ScholarYamawaki, H 1993. “Location Decisions of Japanese Multinational Firms in European Manufacturing Industries.” In European Competitiveness, ed. Hughes, K. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle ScholarYeaple, S R 2013. “The Multinational Firm.” Annual Review of Economics 5 (1): 193–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous chapterNext chapter FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetails View Published: September 2018ISBN: 978-1-4648-1157-9e-ISBN: 978-1-4648-1158-6 Copyright & Permissions Related RegionsEurope and Central AsiaRelated TopicsInformation and Communication TechnologiesInternational Economics & TradeMacroeconomics and Economic GrowthPrivate Sector Development KeywordsGLOBAL ECONOMYINNOVATIONREGIONAL COOPERATION AND TRADEREGIONAL ECONOMYMARKET SUPPLY CHAINSCONNECTIVITY AND ACCESS TO MARKETSFOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTFDIMIGRATIONEXTERNAL SHOCKSMACROECONOMIC SHOCKSVALUE CHAINSTELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICYPRODUCTIVITYPREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENTSKNOWLEDGE SHARING PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2894977470 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2894977470 creator A5089643858 @default.
• W2894977470 date "2018-09-20" @default.
• W2894977470 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2894977470 title "Knowledge Transfers from International Openness in Trade and Investment: The European Case" @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1441361936 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1489208664 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1490843091 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1592860285 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1606225998 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1762745921 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1839906274 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1977853435 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1978573205 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1983671637 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1986648612 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W1990694252 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2001761233 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2002007234 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2005144066 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2008190574 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2017851387 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2033946512 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2034643635 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2035230633 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2044360841 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2046621005 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2069661578 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2077710056 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2092814916 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2092983422 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2093993278 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2097780985 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2105360587 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2106864094 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2108795964 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2111801794 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2116656522 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2122595797 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2124933622 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2125806366 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2137542521 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2141673789 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2146344723 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2165429918 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2166807870 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2168845291 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2172996358 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2241400277 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2252370213 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2256159506 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W235365372 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2555965600 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W2762079936 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3121855595 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3122247001 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3122619127 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3122848851 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3123155750 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3123261135 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3123379813 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3123390760 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3123794974 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3124671068 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3124796732 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3125167979 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W3207490654 @default.
• W2894977470 cites W4250805651 @default.
• W2894977470 doi "https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1157-9_ch2" @default.
• W2894977470 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894977470 type Work @default.
• W2894977470 sameAs 2894977470 @default.
• W2894977470 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2894977470 countsByYear W28949774702023 @default.
• W2894977470 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2894977470 hasAuthorship W2894977470A5089643858 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C18547055 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C27548731 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C2992823438 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C33842695 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C84976871 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConceptScore W2894977470C139719470 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConceptScore W2894977470C144133560 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConceptScore W2894977470C155202549 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConceptScore W2894977470C15744967 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConceptScore W2894977470C162324750 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConceptScore W2894977470C17744445 @default.
• W2894977470 hasConceptScore W2894977470C18547055 @default.

• next