FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895087680> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2895087680 endingPage "E499" @default.
• W2895087680 startingPage "E494" @default.
• W2895087680 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A retrospective analysis. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing revision minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression (MIS LD) in the ambulatory and hospital-based surgical settings. Summary of Background Data. Revision LD has been associated with an increased risk of complications compared with primary LD. Furthermore, ambulatory primary LD has been demonstrated to be a safe and viable option in appropriately selected patients. However, there is a paucity of information comparing hospital-based versus ambulatory outcomes in revision LD. Methods. A prospectively maintained surgical registry of patients undergoing revision MIS lumbar laminectomy and/or discectomy for degenerative pathology from 2013 to 2017 was retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for measured confounding variables, including patient age, comorbidity burden as measured by Charlson Comorbidity Index, and preoperative diagnosis. Differences in operative variables, complication rates, pain scores, narcotics consumption, and reoperation rates were assessed using Pearson Chi-squared analysis (categorical) and Student t test (continuous). Results. Seventy patients were included, of whom 35 underwent revision MIS LD at a hospital-based center (HBC), and 35 underwent surgery at an ambulatory surgical center (ASC). HBC and ASC patients demonstrated similar postoperative visual analog scale pain scores and hourly narcotics consumption during surgical stay (P < 0.001). ASC patients exhibited a significantly shorter length of stay than hospital-based patients (2.7 vs. 11.6 hours, P < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients undergoing revision MIS LD in an ASC demonstrated similar perioperative outcomes as compared to patients undergoing revision MIS LD in a HBC. These results suggest that revision MIS LD can be performed safe and effectively in the ambulatory setting in an appropriately selected surgical population. Further study of patient outcomes following spine surgery performed outside of the traditional hospital setting is crucial, as the delivery of care in the ambulatory setting continues to grow in popularity. Level of Evidence: 3 This study compares outcomes in patients who underwent a revision minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD) in an ambulatory surgery or hospital-based center. The results demonstrate that revision MIS LD can be safe and effectively performed in either setting." @default.
• W2895087680 created "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2895087680 creator A5002057987 @default.
• W2895087680 creator A5009447054 @default.
• W2895087680 creator A5010208159 @default.
• W2895087680 creator A5024846630 @default.
• W2895087680 creator A5038424146 @default.
• W2895087680 creator A5078752916 @default.
• W2895087680 date "2019-04-15" @default.
• W2895087680 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2895087680 title "Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting" @default.
• W2895087680 cites W1965585025 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W1995310763 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2000445173 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2007498217 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2013636599 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2035975747 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2046921272 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2047710221 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2066071627 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2099912755 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2115925587 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2119662846 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2176203678 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2186897772 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2317711212 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2324197847 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2417725848 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2507631217 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2598359733 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W2736816277 @default.
• W2895087680 cites W597354056 @default.
• W2895087680 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002881" @default.
• W2895087680 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30234800" @default.
• W2895087680 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2895087680 type Work @default.
• W2895087680 sameAs 2895087680 @default.
• W2895087680 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2895087680 countsByYear W28950876802019 @default.
• W2895087680 countsByYear W28950876802020 @default.
• W2895087680 countsByYear W28950876802021 @default.
• W2895087680 countsByYear W28950876802022 @default.
• W2895087680 countsByYear W28950876802023 @default.
• W2895087680 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2895087680 hasAuthorship W2895087680A5002057987 @default.
• W2895087680 hasAuthorship W2895087680A5009447054 @default.
• W2895087680 hasAuthorship W2895087680A5010208159 @default.
• W2895087680 hasAuthorship W2895087680A5024846630 @default.
• W2895087680 hasAuthorship W2895087680A5038424146 @default.
• W2895087680 hasAuthorship W2895087680A5078752916 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C17923572 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C2779159551 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C2780091945 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C35785553 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C118552586 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C126322002 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C141071460 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C167135981 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C17923572 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C2779159551 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C2780091945 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C2780775167 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C31174226 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C35785553 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C44575665 @default.
• W2895087680 hasConceptScore W2895087680C71924100 @default.
• W2895087680 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2895087680 hasLocation W28950876801 @default.
• W2895087680 hasOpenAccess W2895087680 @default.
• W2895087680 hasPrimaryLocation W28950876801 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W2312635070 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W2354785620 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W2389562426 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W2586998360 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W2766832809 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W2767618185 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W3000734051 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W3123523652 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W3213345607 @default.
• W2895087680 hasRelatedWork W3006168697 @default.
• W2895087680 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2895087680 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2895087680 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2895087680 magId "2895087680" @default.
• W2895087680 workType "article" @default.