Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895209218> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2895209218 endingPage "831" @default.
- W2895209218 startingPage "824" @default.
- W2895209218 abstract "ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze the impact of completion digital subtraction angiography (cDSA) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on technical and early clinical results.MethodsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing CEA from January 2011 to January 2015. Routine cDSA was performed in all patients. Study end points were the incidence of pathologic findings on completion angiography necessitating intraoperative revision, type of revision, periprocedural stroke rate, mortality, morbidity, and recurrent stenosis rate during follow-up (median, 5 months; range, 0-39 months).ResultsThere were 827 procedures performed in 770 patients (male, 72.5%; median age, 70.6 years) with extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (asymptomatic, 57.3%); 426 patients underwent conventional endarterectomy (cCEA) with patch angioplasty (51.6%), 393 patients (47.5%) received an eversion technique (eCEA), and 8 patients (1%) underwent other revascularization. Immediate surgical revision based on angiographic findings after CEA was performed in 6.9% (57/827) of cases. Reasons for revision of the ICA were mural thrombus in 7.0% (4/57), dissections in 7.0% (4/57), residual stenosis in 8.7% (5/57), and intimal flaps of ICA in 1.8% (1/57). In six cases, combined pathologic changes of the ICA and external carotid artery led to revision. Thirty-five revisions (4.2%) were performed for isolated pathologic angiographic findings of the external carotid artery; in two cases, revision was performed for residual stenosis of the common carotid artery. There was no significant difference regarding the frequency of revision between surgical techniques (cCEA, 56.4%; eCEA, 63.6%; P = .76). However, mural thrombus as a reason for revision was more common in the cCEA group; plaque residues were more common in the eCEA group. Periprocedural (30-day) stroke rate was 0.5% (4/827); six additional patients suffered transient ischemic attack (0.7%). The mortality rate within 30 days was 0.1% (1/827); 30-day morbidity was 4.2% (35/827). The rate of recurrent stenosis (>50%) during follow-up was 0.8%. There was no significant correlation between pathologic findings on cDSA with consecutive revision and perioperative stroke rate, recurrent stenosis rate, mortality, or morbidity.ConclusionsIn this study, cDSA after CEA detected findings leading to immediate intraoperative surgical revision in a relevant proportion of cases. Therefore, cDSA represents a reasonable quality control without being associated with significantly prolonged operating times. Whether cDSA reduces perioperative stroke rate, procedure-related mortality, morbidity, or incidence of early recurrent stenosis cannot be proven with the current study design." @default.
- W2895209218 created "2018-10-12" @default.
- W2895209218 creator A5010642342 @default.
- W2895209218 creator A5016954466 @default.
- W2895209218 creator A5028854951 @default.
- W2895209218 creator A5050983644 @default.
- W2895209218 creator A5059174917 @default.
- W2895209218 creator A5069197840 @default.
- W2895209218 date "2019-03-01" @default.
- W2895209218 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2895209218 title "Impact of routine completion angiography on outcome after carotid endarterectomy" @default.
- W2895209218 cites W1598961855 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W1740376762 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W1991666941 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2000764119 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2003190236 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2005705551 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2021257617 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2068899261 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2094841528 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2096428391 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2108356196 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2109790016 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2115380910 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2124316945 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2128749853 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2130705423 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2143322228 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2316997036 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W2612334191 @default.
- W2895209218 cites W4251422391 @default.
- W2895209218 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.210" @default.
- W2895209218 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30292609" @default.
- W2895209218 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2895209218 type Work @default.
- W2895209218 sameAs 2895209218 @default.
- W2895209218 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W2895209218 countsByYear W28952092182020 @default.
- W2895209218 countsByYear W28952092182021 @default.
- W2895209218 countsByYear W28952092182022 @default.
- W2895209218 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2895209218 hasAuthorship W2895209218A5010642342 @default.
- W2895209218 hasAuthorship W2895209218A5016954466 @default.
- W2895209218 hasAuthorship W2895209218A5028854951 @default.
- W2895209218 hasAuthorship W2895209218A5050983644 @default.
- W2895209218 hasAuthorship W2895209218A5059174917 @default.
- W2895209218 hasAuthorship W2895209218A5069197840 @default.
- W2895209218 hasBestOaLocation W28952092181 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2777910003 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2778286760 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2778333808 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2779745121 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C126838900 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C127413603 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C141071460 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C164705383 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C167135981 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2777910003 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2778286760 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2778333808 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2779464278 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2779745121 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2780007028 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2780643987 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2780645631 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C2781068581 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C500558357 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C71924100 @default.
- W2895209218 hasConceptScore W2895209218C78519656 @default.
- W2895209218 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2895209218 hasLocation W28952092181 @default.
- W2895209218 hasLocation W28952092182 @default.
- W2895209218 hasOpenAccess W2895209218 @default.
- W2895209218 hasPrimaryLocation W28952092181 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W1993165079 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W2027806115 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W2046198032 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W2099869588 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W2125320805 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W2252937083 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W2415642782 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W28203951 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W4238168936 @default.
- W2895209218 hasRelatedWork W4298238921 @default.
- W2895209218 hasVolume "69" @default.