FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895794546> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2895794546 endingPage "S102" @default.
• W2895794546 startingPage "S95" @default.
• W2895794546 abstract "Screening for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to reduce colorectal cancer mortality. Blacks have a higher mortality from this malignancy, particularly men, yet screening rates in this population are often found to be lower than in whites. A modest literature demonstrates effective interventions that can increase screening rates in blacks; however, results are not consistent and ongoing work is required. Most work has not addressed specific barriers to screening in black men. Given the lack of studies on black men only, this study evaluated the state of research in the black population using a PubMed search. The authors provide commentary that proposes increased (1) state and local government support for collaborative programs with healthcare organizations, including patient navigation; (2) augmented community-organizing efforts to generate more attention to the need for colorectal cancer screening in the black community, with a focus on black men; and (3) federal research funding to promote investigation into new interventions and evaluation of existing ones. Specific recommendations for black men include lowering the screening age to 45 years, increasing access to health care, the use of patient navigators, and improved reporting and monitoring of colorectal cancer screening rates.Supplement informationThis article is part of a supplement entitled African American Men's Health: Research, Practice, and Policy Implications, which is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. Screening for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to reduce colorectal cancer mortality. Blacks have a higher mortality from this malignancy, particularly men, yet screening rates in this population are often found to be lower than in whites. A modest literature demonstrates effective interventions that can increase screening rates in blacks; however, results are not consistent and ongoing work is required. Most work has not addressed specific barriers to screening in black men. Given the lack of studies on black men only, this study evaluated the state of research in the black population using a PubMed search. The authors provide commentary that proposes increased (1) state and local government support for collaborative programs with healthcare organizations, including patient navigation; (2) augmented community-organizing efforts to generate more attention to the need for colorectal cancer screening in the black community, with a focus on black men; and (3) federal research funding to promote investigation into new interventions and evaluation of existing ones. Specific recommendations for black men include lowering the screening age to 45 years, increasing access to health care, the use of patient navigators, and improved reporting and monitoring of colorectal cancer screening rates. This article is part of a supplement entitled African American Men's Health: Research, Practice, and Policy Implications, which is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health." @default.
• W2895794546 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2895794546 creator A5020202387 @default.
• W2895794546 creator A5045597408 @default.
• W2895794546 date "2018-11-01" @default.
• W2895794546 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2895794546 title "Colorectal Cancer Screening in Black Men: Recommendations for Best Practices" @default.
• W2895794546 cites W105459544 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W1485534111 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W1530192210 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W1786576987 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W195042267 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W1965411431 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W1976712471 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W1986996317 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2010434960 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2013924607 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2014687363 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2016884872 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2040869378 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2059777231 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2066974464 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2067278282 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2109671053 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2112565026 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2119000501 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2127221713 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2131142429 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2132145712 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2133798292 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2137718259 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2145810626 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2159078264 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2163349047 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2166923156 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2169767089 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2180049851 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W218774049 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2278216384 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2322745358 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2330749262 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2335868753 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2341202544 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2343190624 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2433575101 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2462309235 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2504482676 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2529576015 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2532551703 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2559134967 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2565349479 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2594373254 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2619143830 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2620250162 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2737738902 @default.
• W2895794546 cites W2750547547 @default.
• W2895794546 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.008" @default.
• W2895794546 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30670207" @default.
• W2895794546 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2895794546 type Work @default.
• W2895794546 sameAs 2895794546 @default.
• W2895794546 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2895794546 countsByYear W28957945462018 @default.
• W2895794546 countsByYear W28957945462020 @default.
• W2895794546 countsByYear W28957945462021 @default.
• W2895794546 countsByYear W28957945462022 @default.
• W2895794546 countsByYear W28957945462023 @default.
• W2895794546 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2895794546 hasAuthorship W2895794546A5020202387 @default.
• W2895794546 hasAuthorship W2895794546A5045597408 @default.
• W2895794546 hasBestOaLocation W28957945461 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C2776463041 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C121608353 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C126322002 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C159110408 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C160735492 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C17744445 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C199539241 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C27415008 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C2776463041 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C2908647359 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C512399662 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C526805850 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C71924100 @default.
• W2895794546 hasConceptScore W2895794546C74909509 @default.

• next