FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895854679> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2895854679 endingPage "k4011" @default.
• W2895854679 startingPage "k4011" @default.
• W2895854679 abstract "To determine whether patients admitted to US hospitals that are accredited have better outcomes than those admitted to hospitals reviewed through state surveys, and whether accreditation by The Joint Commission (the largest and most well known accrediting body with an international presence) confers any additional benefits for patients compared with other independent accrediting organizations.Observational study.4400 hospitals in the United States, of which 3337 were accredited (2847 by The Joint Commission) and 1063 underwent state based review between 2014 and 2017.4 242 684 patients aged 65 years and older admitted for 15 common medical and six common surgical conditions and survey respondents of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (HCAHPS).Risk adjusted mortality and readmission rates at 30 days and HCAHPS patient experience scores. Hospital admissions were identified from Medicare inpatient files for 2014, and accreditation information was obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and The Joint Commission.Patients treated at accredited hospitals had lower 30 day mortality rates (although not statistically significant lower rates, based on the prespecified P value threshold) than those at hospitals that were reviewed by a state survey agency (10.2% v 10.6%, difference 0.4% (95% confidence interval 0.1% to 0.8%), P=0.03), but nearly identical rates of mortality for the six surgical conditions (2.4% v 2.4%, 0.0% (-0.3% to 0.3%), P=0.99). Readmissions for the 15 medical conditions at 30 days were significantly lower at accredited hospitals than at state survey hospitals (22.4% v 23.2%, 0.8% (0.4% to 1.3%), P<0.001) but did not differ for the surgical conditions (15.9% v 15.6%, 0.3% (-1.2% to 1.6%), P=0.75). No statistically significant differences were seen in 30 day mortality or readmission rates (for both the medical or surgical conditions) between hospitals accredited by The Joint Commission and those accredited by other independent organizations. Patient experience scores were modestly better at state survey hospitals than at accredited hospitals (summary star rating 3.4 v 3.2, 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3), P<0.001). Among accredited hospitals, The Joint Commission did not have significantly different patient experience scores compared to other independent organizations (3.1 v 3.2, 0.1 (-0.003 to 0.2), P=0.06).US hospital accreditation by independent organizations is not associated with lower mortality, and is only slightly associated with reduced readmission rates for the 15 common medical conditions selected in this study. There was no evidence in this study to indicate that patients choosing a hospital accredited by The Joint Commission confer any healthcare benefits over choosing a hospital accredited by another independent accrediting organization." @default.
• W2895854679 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2895854679 creator A5005202664 @default.
• W2895854679 creator A5019945705 @default.
• W2895854679 creator A5033742702 @default.
• W2895854679 creator A5035735060 @default.
• W2895854679 creator A5048037454 @default.
• W2895854679 creator A5050602639 @default.
• W2895854679 date "2018-10-18" @default.
• W2895854679 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2895854679 title "Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study" @default.
• W2895854679 cites W15214515 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W1531974976 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W1905165508 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W1984904874 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W1985907390 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W1992334646 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2009904189 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2021395882 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2027255431 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2048707050 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2054426915 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2057453223 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2057463219 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2086194800 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2086674657 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2091539754 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2093032071 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2096369585 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2109784948 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2113601646 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2115782472 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2120652865 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2126191865 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2129719017 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2148055370 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2172046354 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2230193073 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2346643226 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2411419794 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2468153731 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2512554392 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2513339506 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2564225457 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2597433757 @default.
• W2895854679 cites W2617016860 @default.
• W2895854679 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4011" @default.
• W2895854679 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6193202" @default.
• W2895854679 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30337294" @default.
• W2895854679 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2895854679 type Work @default.
• W2895854679 sameAs 2895854679 @default.
• W2895854679 citedByCount "65" @default.
• W2895854679 countsByYear W28958546792019 @default.
• W2895854679 countsByYear W28958546792020 @default.
• W2895854679 countsByYear W28958546792021 @default.
• W2895854679 countsByYear W28958546792022 @default.
• W2895854679 countsByYear W28958546792023 @default.
• W2895854679 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2895854679 hasAuthorship W2895854679A5005202664 @default.
• W2895854679 hasAuthorship W2895854679A5019945705 @default.
• W2895854679 hasAuthorship W2895854679A5033742702 @default.
• W2895854679 hasAuthorship W2895854679A5035735060 @default.
• W2895854679 hasAuthorship W2895854679A5048037454 @default.
• W2895854679 hasAuthorship W2895854679A5050602639 @default.
• W2895854679 hasBestOaLocation W28958546791 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C2776534028 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C10138342 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C126322002 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C160735492 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C162324750 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C194828623 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C23131810 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C2776034101 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C2776534028 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C44249647 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C50522688 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C509550671 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C512399662 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C61521584 @default.
• W2895854679 hasConceptScore W2895854679C71924100 @default.
• W2895854679 hasLocation W28958546791 @default.
• W2895854679 hasLocation W28958546792 @default.
• W2895854679 hasLocation W28958546793 @default.
• W2895854679 hasLocation W28958546794 @default.

• next