FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895871060> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2895871060 endingPage "487" @default.
• W2895871060 startingPage "480" @default.
• W2895871060 abstract "BACKGROUND: Age-related changes in upper airway anatomy may affect the overall performance of supraglottic airways significantly. The clinical performance of the i-gel and the self-pressurized air-Q intubating laryngeal airways with noninflatable cuffs for elderly populations remains unknown, unlike in children. Thus, we performed a prospective, randomized comparison of these 2 supraglottic airways in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia. METHODS: We recruited 100 patients, 65–90 years of age, who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with muscle relaxation. The enrolled patients were allocated to the i-gel or self-pressurized air-Q group. We assessed oropharyngeal leak pressure as the primary outcome and fiberoptic view after placement and fixation of the airway and at 10 minutes after the initial assessment. The fiberoptic view was scored using a 5-point scale as follows: vocal cords not visible; vocal cords and anterior epiglottis visible, >50% visual obstruction of epiglottis to vocal cords; vocal cords and anterior epiglottis visible, <50% visual obstruction of epiglottis to vocal cords; vocal cords and posterior epiglottis visible; and vocal cords visible. We also investigated success rate and ease of insertion, insertion time, and manipulations during insertion as insertion variables, complications during maintenance and emergence periods, and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications including sore throat, dysphagia, and dysphonia. RESULTS: After assessing for eligibility, 48 patients were allocated to each group. Oropharyngeal leak pressures were significantly higher in the i-gel group than in the self-pressurized air-Q group ( P < .001) at the 2 measurement points. The raw mean difference at initial assessment and the median difference after 10 minutes were 5.5 cm H 2 O (95% confidence interval, 3.3–7.6 cm H 2 O) and 5.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.0–7.0 cm H 2 O), respectively. The initial scores of fiberoptic view were similar in the 2 groups. However, the self-pressurized air-Q supraglottic airway provided a significantly improved fiberoptic view at 10 minutes after initial assessment ( P = .030). We found no statistically significant differences in insertion variables and complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The i-gel provided better sealing function than the self-pressurized air-Q supraglottic airway according to the high oropharyngeal leak pressures in elderly patients during general anesthesia. The self-pressurized air-Q supraglottic airway had improved fiberoptic views in elderly patients during general anesthesia." @default.
• W2895871060 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2895871060 creator A5019018749 @default.
• W2895871060 creator A5020449163 @default.
• W2895871060 creator A5047514672 @default.
• W2895871060 creator A5048157807 @default.
• W2895871060 creator A5048305305 @default.
• W2895871060 creator A5062357712 @default.
• W2895871060 date "2020-02-01" @default.
• W2895871060 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2895871060 title "Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the i-gel and the Self-Pressurized air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Elderly Anesthetized Patients" @default.
• W2895871060 cites W137319699 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W1512079928 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W195503390 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W1963900334 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W1976000083 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W1993102400 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W1995325190 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W1995431740 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2002534573 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2004182698 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2008126197 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2008447904 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2020183350 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2033900311 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2050515013 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2062753923 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2080228893 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2100448514 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2125218321 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2127902721 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2131268486 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2139931383 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2141074295 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2155323193 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2163920453 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2182689048 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2319225573 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2320179364 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2396321823 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2517158846 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W2588988750 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W627918116 @default.
• W2895871060 cites W7135341 @default.
• W2895871060 doi "https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000003849" @default.
• W2895871060 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30320644" @default.
• W2895871060 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2895871060 type Work @default.
• W2895871060 sameAs 2895871060 @default.
• W2895871060 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2895871060 countsByYear W28958710602020 @default.
• W2895871060 countsByYear W28958710602021 @default.
• W2895871060 countsByYear W28958710602022 @default.
• W2895871060 countsByYear W28958710602023 @default.
• W2895871060 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2895871060 hasAuthorship W2895871060A5019018749 @default.
• W2895871060 hasAuthorship W2895871060A5020449163 @default.
• W2895871060 hasAuthorship W2895871060A5047514672 @default.
• W2895871060 hasAuthorship W2895871060A5048157807 @default.
• W2895871060 hasAuthorship W2895871060A5048305305 @default.
• W2895871060 hasAuthorship W2895871060A5062357712 @default.
• W2895871060 hasBestOaLocation W28958710601 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2776900724 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2777870961 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2778333281 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2778674591 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2780474809 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2780596822 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2781312054 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2781447300 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C2909644182 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C105922876 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C141071460 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C188816634 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2776900724 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2777870961 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2778333281 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2778674591 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2780474809 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2780596822 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2781312054 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2781447300 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C2909644182 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C42219234 @default.
• W2895871060 hasConceptScore W2895871060C71924100 @default.
• W2895871060 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2895871060 hasLocation W28958710601 @default.
• W2895871060 hasLocation W28958710602 @default.
• W2895871060 hasLocation W28958710603 @default.
• W2895871060 hasOpenAccess W2895871060 @default.
• W2895871060 hasPrimaryLocation W28958710601 @default.
• W2895871060 hasRelatedWork W1571972889 @default.
• W2895871060 hasRelatedWork W1574701917 @default.

• next