FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895895445> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2895895445 abstract "Globally, having the ‘patient and /or family voice’ engaged when measuring quality of care for the dying is fundamentally important. This is particularly pertinent within the United Kingdom, where changes to national guidance about care provided to dying patients has heightened the importance of quality assurance and user-feedback. Our main aim was to engage with clinical services (hospice, hospital and community settings) within a specific English region and conduct a bereaved relatives’ cross-sectional survey about quality of care. Our secondary aim was to explore levers and barriers to project participation as perceived by organisational representatives. Each organisation identified a consecutive sample of next-of-kin to adult patients who died between 1st September and 30th November 2014. Those who had an unexpected death or were involved in a formal complaint were excluded. The ‘Care Of the Dying Evaluation’ (CODE™) questionnaire was posted out three months following the bereavement. One-to-one interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of organisational representatives to explore experiences about project participation. Of the 30 invited organisations, 18 were able to participate comprising: 7 hospitals, 7 hospices and 4 community settings. There were 1774 deaths which met the inclusion criteria but 460 (26%) were excluded due to inaccurate next-of-kin details. Subsequently, 1283 CODE™ questionnaires were sent out, with 354 completed (27% response rate). Overall, most participants perceived good quality of care. A notable minority reported poor care for symptom control and communication especially within the hospital. Nine interviews were conducted - levers to project participation included the ‘significance of user-feedback and the opportunity to use results in a meaningful way’; the main barrier was related to ‘concern about causing distress to bereaved relatives’. Overall, being able to engage with 18 (60%) organisations within the region and conduct the bereaved relatives’ survey showed success of this initiative and was supported by interview findings. The potential to be able to benchmark user-feedback against other organisations was thought to help focus on areas to develop services. This type of quality assurance project could form a template model and be replicated on a national and international level." @default.
• W2895895445 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2895895445 creator A5025506782 @default.
• W2895895445 creator A5029451800 @default.
• W2895895445 creator A5048428625 @default.
• W2895895445 creator A5071235678 @default.
• W2895895445 creator A5091199272 @default.
• W2895895445 date "2018-10-10" @default.
• W2895895445 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2895895445 title "Quality assurance for care of the dying: engaging with clinical services to facilitate a regional cross-sectional survey of bereaved relatives’ views" @default.
• W2895895445 cites W1141904661 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W1565604706 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W1918003399 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W1972623694 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W1977369655 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2003589665 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2010670917 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2012339214 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2017626423 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2054897643 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2058036013 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2073339769 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2077590822 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2081585261 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2097713807 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2100752397 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2125130977 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2125209474 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2127250472 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2134063986 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2137079953 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2138730952 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2144927026 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2159461653 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2165701254 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2168688839 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2329046745 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2397471582 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2408873197 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W2577566011 @default.
• W2895895445 cites W4247928322 @default.
• W2895895445 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3558-z" @default.
• W2895895445 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6180653" @default.
• W2895895445 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30305082" @default.
• W2895895445 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2895895445 type Work @default.
• W2895895445 sameAs 2895895445 @default.
• W2895895445 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2895895445 countsByYear W28958954452019 @default.
• W2895895445 countsByYear W28958954452020 @default.
• W2895895445 countsByYear W28958954452021 @default.
• W2895895445 countsByYear W28958954452022 @default.
• W2895895445 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2895895445 hasAuthorship W2895895445A5025506782 @default.
• W2895895445 hasAuthorship W2895895445A5029451800 @default.
• W2895895445 hasAuthorship W2895895445A5048428625 @default.
• W2895895445 hasAuthorship W2895895445A5071235678 @default.
• W2895895445 hasAuthorship W2895895445A5091199272 @default.
• W2895895445 hasBestOaLocation W28958954451 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C137992405 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C145642194 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C2777116211 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C2780838233 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C518773536 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C111472728 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C137992405 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C138816342 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C138885662 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C142052008 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C142724271 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C145642194 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C159110408 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C166957645 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C17744445 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C199539241 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C2777116211 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C2779530757 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C2780838233 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C512399662 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C518773536 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C71924100 @default.
• W2895895445 hasConceptScore W2895895445C95457728 @default.
• W2895895445 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2895895445 hasLocation W28958954451 @default.
• W2895895445 hasLocation W28958954452 @default.
• W2895895445 hasLocation W28958954453 @default.
• W2895895445 hasLocation W28958954454 @default.

• next