FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895906769> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2895906769 endingPage "e516" @default.
• W2895906769 startingPage "e516" @default.
• W2895906769 abstract "There is a concern that use of abdominal compression (AC) for respiratory motion management in abdominal SBRT might result in inconsistencies between predicted and delivered dose for nearby critical structures (CS) especially the gastrointestinal (GI) CS. The current study aimed at evaluating the impact of AC on the dosimetry of GI-CS and toxicity for patients treated with non-hepatic abdominal SBRT. Two sets of CT scans (planning CT scans with AC and pre-treatment diagnostic CT scans without AC) were analyzed for patient cohort, treated with AC with prescribed dose to planning target volume (PTV) ≥25 Gy/5-fractions. Target volumes were delineated on both scans, and PTV was expanded by 2 cm (PTV+2) and 4 cm (PTV+4). All GI-CS (duodenum, stomach, small bowel and large bowel) were contoured on both sets of scans. They were fused to create a composite CS (GI-lumen). Rigid registration of AC and non-AC scans were performed using commercial software, which allowed the transfer of GI-CS from non-AC to AC-CT scans, resulting in required dose information. The quality of the rigid registration was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). We calculated the volume of GI-CS within PTV+2 and PTV+4 and dose-volume parameters including V30Gy, and D0.2cc. Independent sample t-test was used for statistical comparison, and toxicity events were gathered from prospectively collected clinical data. A total of 12 patients met the DSC set criterion (DSC≥0.85). Primary targets included pancreas (n=3), retro-peritoneal nodal mass (n=6), adrenal gland mass (n=3). No difference was seen between the AC vs. non-AC with respect to volume of stomach (22.3 cc vs. 20.3 cc; p=0.88), duodenum (17.2 cc vs. 5.8 cc; p=0.1), small bowel (30.9 cc vs. 47.5 cc; p=0.37), large bowel (28.9 cc vs. 30.1 cc; p=0.95) and GI-lumen (120.6 cc vs. 107 cc; p=0.75) within PTV+2. Similarly, there was no difference in volume of any GI-CS within PTV+4: stomach (61.1 cc vs. 69.9 cc; p=0.77), duodenum (34.24 cc vs. 14.07 cc; p=0.13), small bowel (83.91 cc vs. 129.44 cc; p=0.26), large bowel (80.32 cc vs. 86.12 cc; p=0.88) and GI-lumen (258.78 cc vs. 297.32 cc; p=0.59) between AC vs non-AC respectively. There was a significant improvement in V30Gy of GI-lumen with AC (0.107cc vs. 4.9cc) (p=0.036). There was no difference in D0.2cc of GI-lumen (26.09 Gy vs. 30.44 Gy; p=0.20) or other GI-CS between AC vs. non-AC. Three patients had acute grade-1 anorexia, one patient had acute grade-2 gastritis. There was no grade ≥3 acute or chronic toxicity. Use of AC did not confer any dose inconsistencies in our study cohort. There was a significant improvement in V30 of GI-lumen with use of AC. Patients, originally treated using AC, completed their radiation treatment with minimal toxicity." @default.
• W2895906769 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2895906769 creator A5001502708 @default.
• W2895906769 creator A5034442360 @default.
• W2895906769 creator A5059409531 @default.
• W2895906769 creator A5066074799 @default.
• W2895906769 creator A5070726694 @default.
• W2895906769 creator A5082004047 @default.
• W2895906769 date "2018-11-01" @default.
• W2895906769 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2895906769 title "A Report Exploring the Influence of Abdominal Compression on Dosimetry of Adjacent Gastro-Intestinal Critical Structures and Toxicities for Patients Treated with Non-Hepatic Abdominal SBRT" @default.
• W2895906769 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.1457" @default.
• W2895906769 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2895906769 type Work @default.
• W2895906769 sameAs 2895906769 @default.
• W2895906769 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2895906769 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2895906769 hasAuthorship W2895906769A5001502708 @default.
• W2895906769 hasAuthorship W2895906769A5034442360 @default.
• W2895906769 hasAuthorship W2895906769A5059409531 @default.
• W2895906769 hasAuthorship W2895906769A5066074799 @default.
• W2895906769 hasAuthorship W2895906769A5070726694 @default.
• W2895906769 hasAuthorship W2895906769A5082004047 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C2779422922 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C126322002 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C126838900 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C201645570 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C2779422922 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C2989005 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C509974204 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C71924100 @default.
• W2895906769 hasConceptScore W2895906769C75088862 @default.
• W2895906769 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2895906769 hasLocation W28959067691 @default.
• W2895906769 hasOpenAccess W2895906769 @default.
• W2895906769 hasPrimaryLocation W28959067691 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W1650996660 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W2050101289 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W2117141716 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W2144622085 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W2186742268 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W2487329160 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W2529481322 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W3029539430 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W3030063216 @default.
• W2895906769 hasRelatedWork W3146372209 @default.
• W2895906769 hasVolume "102" @default.
• W2895906769 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2895906769 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2895906769 magId "2895906769" @default.
• W2895906769 workType "article" @default.