FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2895967487> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2895967487 abstract "Die vraag word gestel: wanneer sal teologie as ‘n wetenskap geld sodat teologiese arbeid ‘n plek aan ‘n openbare universiteit verseker kan wees? Die debat of teologie by ‘n universiteit hoort of gerelegeer behoort te word tot kerklike skole hang af van die keuse van tipologie wat bepaal of teologie as ‘n wetenskap beskou word. Die dialoogmodel veronderstel ‘n mutualistiese verhouding tussen wetenskap en teologie wat impliseer dat daar gemene grond in voorveronderstellings, metode en konsepte is wat gesprek moontlik en selfs noodsaaklik maak. Dit vereis dat teologie ‘n gespreksvennoot in en met die wetenskappe bly maar word gekortwiek wanneer teologie absolutistiese eise maak gebaseer op die uitgediende veronderstelling dat die kerk met ewige waarhede werk wat nie krities bespreek kan word nie. Teologiese ondersoek moet deurgaans ‘n kritiese ingesteldheid teenoor sy metodologie handhaaf, oop vir betwisting bly, interdissiplinêr, multidissiplinêr en selfs transdissiplinêr navorsing doen en bydra tot die mens se soeke na begrip en betekenis. So alleen kan teologie ‘n waardige dialoogvennoot word. Die artikel word afgesluit deur te demonstreer wat die bydrae van so ‘n dialoog kan wees, deur in gesprek met die veertiende-eeuse Middel-Engelse mistieke Cloud of Unknowing te tree. Die gevolgtrekking is dat die teks nadenke oor hermeneuse asook God en gebed kan verryk. Abstract The question is asked: when will theology be a science so that theological work can be ensured a place at a public university? The debate whether theology should be practiced at a university or be delegated to church schools depends on the choice of typology that determines whether theology is regarded as a science. The dialogue model presupposes a mutualistic relationship between science and theology that implies that common ground in presuppositions, methods and concepts makes such a dialogue possible and even necessary. This requires that theology remains a conversation partner in and with the sciences but is handicapped when theology makes absolutistic demands based on the outdated assumption that the church works with eternal truths that can not be critically discussed. Theological inquiry must maintain a critical attitude towards its methodology throughout, be open for contestation, represent interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and even transdisciplinary research and contribute to the human quest for understanding and meaning. In this way, theology can be a worthwhile dialogue partner. The article concludes by demonstrating what the contribution of such a dialogue can be by interviewing the fourteenth century Middle English mystical Cloud or Unknowing. The conclusion is that the text can enrich reflection on hermeneutics as well as God and prayer." @default.
• W2895967487 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2895967487 creator A5037105139 @default.
• W2895967487 date "2018-10-12" @default.
• W2895967487 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2895967487 title "Teologie as wetenskap: Noodsaak van dialoog" @default.
• W2895967487 cites W1968849611 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2014518302 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2043987490 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2089263478 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2155139953 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2161147115 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2290583425 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2333837941 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2416124382 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2476135043 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2506635361 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W2559539755 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W3000061611 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W4238085281 @default.
• W2895967487 cites W611188545 @default.
• W2895967487 doi "https://doi.org/10.19108/koers.83.1.2309" @default.
• W2895967487 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2895967487 type Work @default.
• W2895967487 sameAs 2895967487 @default.
• W2895967487 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2895967487 countsByYear W28959674872019 @default.
• W2895967487 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2895967487 hasAuthorship W2895967487A5037105139 @default.
• W2895967487 hasBestOaLocation W28959674871 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConcept C90805587 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConceptScore W2895967487C138885662 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConceptScore W2895967487C27206212 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConceptScore W2895967487C41895202 @default.
• W2895967487 hasConceptScore W2895967487C90805587 @default.
• W2895967487 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2895967487 hasLocation W28959674871 @default.
• W2895967487 hasOpenAccess W2895967487 @default.
• W2895967487 hasPrimaryLocation W28959674871 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W2038352934 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W2152253204 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W2165911545 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W2332442351 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W2604174649 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W2620648627 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W2765387638 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W3023304313 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W401777604 @default.
• W2895967487 hasRelatedWork W3007581847 @default.
• W2895967487 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W2895967487 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2895967487 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2895967487 magId "2895967487" @default.
• W2895967487 workType "article" @default.