FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896041978> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896041978 abstract "Recent years have witnessed widespread expansion of state and regional growth management programs in the United States (Godschalk and Brower 1989; Kelly 1993; Nelson et al. 1995; Burby and May 1997; Porter 1997). By 1999, there were fourteen states with substantive land use legislation, and regional planning, spurred forward by federal transportation policy, now plays a significant role in most metropolitan areas. But while the realization of comprehensive land use policies is widely viewed as a major step forward by members of the planning discipline, much progress remains to be made because program evaluation has not kept pace with implementation. As a consequence, there is little evidence that growth management fulfils its intended objectives and even less evidence to counter criticisms suggesting that strict regulation may seriously disrupt local and regional land markets (see, e.g., Fischel 1990; Richardson and Gordon 1993). In short, growth management remains surrounded by uncertainty even as it continues to gain momentum and political support. This dilemma is compounded by the disembodied structure of scholarly research on the topic. Within the planning literature, there is an overall lack of systematic analyses and agreed-upon measures for evaluating the outcome of growth management programs (Blanco 1998). Moreover, few studies have produced results that are generalizable to other cases (Bollens 1993), leaving little in the way of established theory for new research to build upon. Each of these issues is tied to the multilayered structure of planning in the United States, which has led researchers to investigate “growth management” variously at the local, regional, and state levels of implementation. Knowledge of program effects has been built in a piecemeal way, often without explicit recognition of the relevant institutional setting. For example, local and regional urban growth boundaries may fulfill similar functions, but from a political standpoint, the two represent very different policies—in this case, scale clearly makes a difference. Without a clear understanding of this relationship, supporters are left to defend against criticisms that are more a problem of political organization than of specific growth management policies. Responding to the need for a more unified research strategy, this article develops an integrated framework for evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory growth management programs. The core argument is that analyses should take a more holistic" @default.
• W2896041978 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896041978 creator A5034674277 @default.
• W2896041978 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W2896041978 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2896041978 title "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Regulatory Growth Management Programs" @default.
• W2896041978 cites W144054857 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1481664498 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1499651278 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1508404391 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1534195714 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1538476845 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1546298445 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1973250884 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1991442346 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W1993609268 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2006248600 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2017381592 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2018813828 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2038190518 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2038469877 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2048806320 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2051688880 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2071758064 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2072171930 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2078363570 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2080731961 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2088312823 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2153639310 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2153649560 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2162477388 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2575572272 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2584708986 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W2914173646 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W3123472568 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W3126104344 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W562089885 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W573687605 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W589566465 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W596469804 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W621583460 @default.
• W2896041978 cites W656731169 @default.
• W2896041978 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2896041978 type Work @default.
• W2896041978 sameAs 2896041978 @default.
• W2896041978 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2896041978 countsByYear W28960419782013 @default.
• W2896041978 countsByYear W28960419782014 @default.
• W2896041978 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896041978 hasAuthorship W2896041978A5034674277 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C1631582 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C2777526511 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C2778496695 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C2780565591 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C4792198 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C49545453 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C111472728 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C127413603 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C13280743 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C138885662 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C147176958 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C162324750 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C1631582 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C17744445 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C199539241 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C205649164 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C2777351106 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C2777526511 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C2778496695 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C2780565591 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C3116431 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C4792198 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C49545453 @default.
• W2896041978 hasConceptScore W2896041978C94625758 @default.
• W2896041978 hasLocation W28960419781 @default.
• W2896041978 hasOpenAccess W2896041978 @default.
• W2896041978 hasPrimaryLocation W28960419781 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W1964777814 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W1981744851 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W1994043272 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W2038131043 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W2051452122 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W2062248910 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W2062327665 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W2069057816 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W210330037 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W2272347232 @default.
• W2896041978 hasRelatedWork W2299514090 @default.

• next