FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896056475> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896056475 endingPage "276" @default.
• W2896056475 startingPage "257" @default.
• W2896056475 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of the experience economy and co-creation concepts on guided tours (GTs) and to analyze the process of the on-site (co-)creation of experience between the service provider and the consumer taking into account the consumer perspective. Design/methodology/approach The objective of the study is fulfilled by reviewing the literature on experience economy and co-creation within a cultural heritage context and then using it to design appropriate research tools to collect empirical data through qualitative interviews within the context of a single case study. The Medieval Town of Rhodes (MTR), Greece, serves as the case in this study. In fact, this study analyzes primary data from 25 interviews with participants in GTs in the MTR. Findings The GT participant’s views of their GT experience were explored, and it was evaluated whether they fit any of the three generations of experience economy with an emphasis on co-creation of experience. The findings show that, in the MTR-GT services, the characteristics of mainly the first and second generation experience economies are found, while little emphasis is given to the third generation experience economy. Based on the empirical results, the RIF model (R: “Resources,” I: “Interactions,” F: “Feelings”) was created: this proposes that both the process of experience co-creation and optimal GT experiences are realized by providing participants with appropriate resources, multiple types of interactions and opportunities to generate positive and pleasant feelings. This model illustrates the intertwining, multi-dimensional facets of an optimal co-created GT experience that service providers and tour operators should provide to their customers. Research limitations/implications The present study has several limitations that need to be mentioned. First, this research is a single case study; the MTR serves as the case, focusing on one cultural heritage service, GTs. This fact can put the study’s validity in question. Moreover, as the research is conducted by a single person, there is the risk of subjective bias. Another limitation is that this study is not a longitudinal one; the latter could lead to more accurate findings. The number and the nationality of participants constitute the 4th and final limitation of the research. More specifically, the sample is not perceived to be representative of the population nor generalizable, while visitors from more nationalities could have been interviewed. In relation to this, the judgmental sampling method was used because the population of the study could not be defined. This serves as the fifth limitation of the study. Practical implications Tour operators and tour guides can exploit the characteristics of GT activities included in the proposed RIF model. By incorporating these elements in GT experiences, the process of experience co-creation could be effectively supported. An optimal GT experience that incorporates intertwining and multi-dimensional facets could be provided. To begin with, the physical setting where the tour takes place must be well preserved, so that it can capture the attention of the participants. The route of the tour should not be exhausting but convenient for all participants and should include various landscapes. On the other hand, tour guides should provide interesting, relevant and cohesive information. Moreover, a tour guide needs to display charismatic behavior to gain the tour group’s trust and generate positive feelings impressing and immersing participants in the experience and encouraging in them a sense of togetherness. Within the context of the tour, tangible elements such as brochures and maps should be provided, allowing vistors to tailor the experience according to their needs and preferences. Furthermore, interaction between the guide and the tour group, as well as among the participants themselves, should be encouraged. In relation to this, the tour group could be divided into sub-groups according to common features such as age. The guides could also come up with a topic to be jointly discussed and participatory activities such as games could be organized. Finally, participants should have some freedom during the tour; time to explore the setting on their own or a visit to specific places on request. Originality/value The originality of the paper lies in the development of the RIF model, illustrating the on-site optimal experience within the context of GTs taking place in the MTR, the setting of the research. The construction of the RIF model was based on an investigation into actual GT participant’s perspectives on GTs." @default.
• W2896056475 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896056475 creator A5037099072 @default.
• W2896056475 date "2018-10-10" @default.
• W2896056475 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2896056475 title "Modeling guided tour participants’ experiences" @default.
• W2896056475 cites W1971648826 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W1982244980 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W1983366748 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W1996085032 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2011717229 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2018836107 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2041535295 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2041767207 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2077088106 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2093505263 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2124513302 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2135526934 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2149237526 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2167834577 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2172104004 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2187569695 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2407277077 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2531642874 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W255469476 @default.
• W2896056475 cites W2795430878 @default.
• W2896056475 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcthr-10-2017-0104" @default.
• W2896056475 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896056475 type Work @default.
• W2896056475 sameAs 2896056475 @default.
• W2896056475 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2896056475 countsByYear W28960564752020 @default.
• W2896056475 countsByYear W28960564752021 @default.
• W2896056475 countsByYear W28960564752022 @default.
• W2896056475 countsByYear W28960564752023 @default.
• W2896056475 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896056475 hasAuthorship W2896056475A5037099072 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C18918823 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C194943564 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C2991725275 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C111472728 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C111919701 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C120936955 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C122980154 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C12713177 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C138885662 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C144024400 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C144133560 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C154945302 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C15744967 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C162853370 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C166957645 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C17744445 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C18918823 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C190248442 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C194943564 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C199539241 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C205649164 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C2779343474 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C2991725275 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C36289849 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C41008148 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C56739046 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C77805123 @default.
• W2896056475 hasConceptScore W2896056475C98045186 @default.
• W2896056475 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2896056475 hasLocation W28960564751 @default.
• W2896056475 hasOpenAccess W2896056475 @default.
• W2896056475 hasPrimaryLocation W28960564751 @default.
• W2896056475 hasRelatedWork W1607255502 @default.
• W2896056475 hasRelatedWork W2083847149 @default.
• W2896056475 hasRelatedWork W2113826088 @default.
• W2896056475 hasRelatedWork W2118730337 @default.
• W2896056475 hasRelatedWork W2255479648 @default.
• W2896056475 hasRelatedWork W2389358522 @default.

• next