FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896090654> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896090654 endingPage "171" @default.
• W2896090654 startingPage "169" @default.
• W2896090654 abstract "Incident reporting has been a mainstay of patient safety initiatives throughout the world, but its purpose and potential for stimulating safety improvements are still much debated. Record review studies of adverse events revealed the nature and scale of harm to patients, and it was initially hoped that incident reporting systems would capture these adverse events on an ongoing basis.1 2 This epidemiological dream was never realised; studies showed that incident reporting was actually very poor at identifying adverse events.3 Furthermore, incident reporting, record review and other systems such as pharmacy reports capture very different types of problems, which means that combining information sources can provide a more complete picture of safety issues.4 5 In this issue, de Vos and colleagues6 extend this argument to suggest that we should draw on a number of data sources and examine the linkages between them at the patient level. Their study in Dutch hospitals examined the links between patient complaints, incident reports and adverse events. Holland has a reporting system for adverse events that is embedded in the medical record and used routinely by physicians. Incident reporting, in contrast, has evolved primarily to capture process problems (though patient accidents are still included). These arrangements differ from the UK, for instance, where incident reporting systems are still the primary means of reporting adverse events. The Dutch system allows for a much clearer separation between these data sources, which is advantageous for the study, but which limits the potential extension of its methodology to countries which do not have a means of routinely recording adverse events.De Vos et al 6 examine a number of different relationships between incidents, adverse events and complaints. In over 26 383 admissions, 1599 (6.1%) of incidents were reported and 4838 (18.3%) adverse events were recorded. Only …" @default.
• W2896090654 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896090654 creator A5006759461 @default.
• W2896090654 creator A5018183534 @default.
• W2896090654 date "2018-10-18" @default.
• W2896090654 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2896090654 title "From incident reporting to the analysis of the patient journey" @default.
• W2896090654 cites W1936622395 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W1986122210 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W1987100562 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W1988423288 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W2142571375 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W2155513146 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W2161015778 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W2285385863 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W2591725003 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W2883376269 @default.
• W2896090654 cites W4212897451 @default.
• W2896090654 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008485" @default.
• W2896090654 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30337497" @default.
• W2896090654 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896090654 type Work @default.
• W2896090654 sameAs 2896090654 @default.
• W2896090654 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2896090654 countsByYear W28960906542019 @default.
• W2896090654 countsByYear W28960906542020 @default.
• W2896090654 countsByYear W28960906542021 @default.
• W2896090654 countsByYear W28960906542022 @default.
• W2896090654 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896090654 hasAuthorship W2896090654A5006759461 @default.
• W2896090654 hasAuthorship W2896090654A5018183534 @default.
• W2896090654 hasBestOaLocation W28960906541 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C159110408 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C160735492 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C162324750 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C2522767166 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C2779328685 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C41008148 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C50522688 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C545542383 @default.
• W2896090654 hasConceptScore W2896090654C71924100 @default.
• W2896090654 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2896090654 hasLocation W28960906541 @default.
• W2896090654 hasLocation W28960906542 @default.
• W2896090654 hasLocation W28960906543 @default.
• W2896090654 hasOpenAccess W2896090654 @default.
• W2896090654 hasPrimaryLocation W28960906541 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W2004486224 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W2074282885 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W2157326779 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W2335179558 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W2604649556 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W2605472355 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W2944248519 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W3012178317 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W4285612548 @default.
• W2896090654 hasRelatedWork W4308511765 @default.
• W2896090654 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W2896090654 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2896090654 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2896090654 magId "2896090654" @default.
• W2896090654 workType "article" @default.