FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896444178> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896444178 abstract "The purpose of this study was to facilitate opportunities for disclosure or whistleblowing in the Indonesian Directorate General of Taxation (DGT). Due to the inherent characteristics of tax-related crimes, in terms of cost, the impact of wrongdoing on State revenue amounts to losses of over a trillion rupiahs. Although many studies have been conducted to investigate factors that may support or deter one’s intention to whistleblow, due to the differences in values, cultures, and norms of each country, scholars agree that there is still a research gap in understanding variables and whistleblowing intention, and that there is a need to re-examine several variables related to whistleblowing in non-western countries. Thus, some variables have not been sufficiently recognised and examined in the Indonesian context. Moreover, differences may arise due to the particular characteristics of different organisations. Utilizing the theory of planned behaviour, this study investigated DGT employees’ intentions to disclose bribery, because it is difficult to study actual whistleblowing. Further, this study enriches the whistleblowing literature by selecting bribery as the type of wrongdoing for investigation and employing Schein’s six mechanisms to measure DGT leadership and organisational culture as perceived by the employees.Initially, it was intended that this study would include all DGT employees by means of a survey administered via the internal internet at DGT’s head office. However, conducting research in Indonesia is often cumbersome because of bureaucratic processes. Notwithstanding, quantitative and qualitative analyses were applied to data gathered in 2016 from 641 questionnaires conducted with randomly selected DGT employees. Additionally, online interviews were conducted with high ranking officials and several key employees. Although this research was not carried out on behalf of the organisation (DGT), it received official approval and employees were encouraged to participate.The primary model, based on attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control (PBC) showed that PBC (organisation positive image, organisation incentive, and organisation negative image) weakened the effect of the other two variables. This finding challenges previous research which endorses the effect of attitude and subjective norm. It was also found that PBC’s organisation negative image was the most important determinant for DGT employees in making a decision to disclose bribery. As well, in general, the study did not reveal a significant relationship between whistleblowing intention and the DGT employees’ demographic characteristics, training attendance, and knowledge about whistleblowing, and confidence about finding another job(s) outside DGT. This study also found that an anonymous internal reporting channel was the most preferred channel for disclosure. Moreover, this study did not find any difference between the intentions of whistle-blowers, bystanders, and non-observers. The findings, all together, indicated that the decision-making process in terms of disclosing bribery was complicated and strongly moderated by perceived behavioural controls of organisation positive image, negative image, and incentive as well as cultural norms.The result is explained by the very pragmatic approach taken as a result of traditional cultural values (high power distance, collectivist, ewuh-pakewuh (uneasiness), nrima (to submit), conformity, peasant mentality, and hypocrisy) may lead to cost and benefit calculations before employees decide whether or not to whistleblow. Additional interesting information was that although financial incentive is considered as an important variable to encourage whistleblowing, the most important reward for DGT employees was placement to preferred location. Again, culture may play an important role to explain the phenomena.The study however was restricted in so far that it considered only DGT employees in several large offices in Jakarta; thus, over-generalization of the findings should be avoided. A further limitation concerns the issue of comparing actual whistleblowing with the intention to do so. This issue requires future research comprising a longitudinal study involving a greater number of DGT employees and a different research design.To sum up, respondents considered that regardless of their attitude, the amount of support received from people who were important to them (i.e. family member, direct supervisors, co-workers, friends, and neighbour), and their confidence about finding another job(s) outside DGT, these factors could not effectively protect them from any retaliation. Only the organization and the actions of high ranking superiors could provide whistle-blowers with sufficient protection and ensure that the report had a successful outcome. This study is useful to policy makers, practitioners, and academics in the field of whistleblowing. The study concludes with recommendations for whistle-blower policy in the Department of Taxation. The study provides some initial insights into employees’ opinions of the value of whistleblowing intention." @default.
• W2896444178 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896444178 creator A5026924898 @default.
• W2896444178 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2896444178 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2896444178 title "Predictors of Employees’ Intention to Whistleblow Using Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Case Study of an Indonesian Government Department" @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1011677460 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W107509755 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W108623807 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W111755084 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1491644571 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1517229207 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1519512645 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1551005702 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1563090511 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1608170983 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W164382917 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1928616228 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1971440513 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1977258648 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1977464646 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1979599674 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1979830082 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1983735505 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1989585291 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1995945562 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1996747730 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2007349223 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2009075666 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2011132676 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2014138334 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2025111410 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2026440379 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2029131532 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2030606857 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2036149274 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2043382874 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2056352422 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2059334100 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2064979200 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2066424242 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2067594023 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2080254212 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2080716608 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2086021570 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2088135512 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2096563449 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2112688502 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2114968162 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2117897510 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2120864536 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2122912498 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2142334915 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2146020555 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2146125869 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2158658569 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2169781683 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2183460454 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2187056258 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2204940936 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2419569997 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2783571795 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W2795864964 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W3121728500 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W3125412706 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W38886133 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W409575611 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W612595550 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W64128356 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W644061648 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1510376399 @default.
• W2896444178 cites W1983543931 @default.
• W2896444178 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896444178 type Work @default.
• W2896444178 sameAs 2896444178 @default.
• W2896444178 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2896444178 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2896444178 hasAuthorship W2896444178A5026924898 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C195487862 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C2777930997 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C2779207338 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C89785696 @default.
• W2896444178 hasConcept C94625758 @default.

• next