FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896449871> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896449871 endingPage "86" @default.
• W2896449871 startingPage "81" @default.
• W2896449871 abstract "Background A percutaneous brachial artery (BA) approach is a suitable or even favorable alternative to femoral artery access when performing certain endovascular interventions. However, this approach may have a higher complication rate compared to femoral artery access. We analyzed our results using percutaneous BA approach for noncardiac endovascular interventions. Methods Between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2017, BA access was used in 157 cases performed on 136 patients. The procedures included 102 (65%) therapeutic interventions and 55 (35%) diagnostic studies. The vessels studied or treated included lower extremity arteries (48), the aorta and iliac arteries (45), mesenteric arteries (45), failing arterial revascularizations (24), renal arteries (9), subclavian arteries (8), carotid arteries (2), and visceral aneurysms (2), or in conjunction with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), fenestrated EVAR, or thoracic EVAR (8). More than 1 vessel was studied or treated in 34 cases. Sheath sizes included 5F in 38 (24%) cases, 6F in 93 (59%) cases, and 7F in 26 (17%) cases. Percutaneous puncture was utilized in 142 (90.4%) cases and planned surgical exposure with primary closure of the BA in 15 (9.6%) cases (10, 7F; 4, 6F; 1, 5F). Manual compression was used for hemostasis at the conclusion of all percutaneous cases. Results There were 2 (1.3%; 2/157 cases) deaths in the perioperative period, one due to myocardial infarction and the other from mesenteric ischemia. Access site complications occurred in 10.6% (15/142) of percutaneous cases, which required open surgical repair for bleeding (8) and BA thrombosis (7). There was an increased risk of complications with increasing sheath size in the percutaneous approach: 5.4% (2/37), 12.4% (11/89), and 12.5% (2/16) for 5F, 6F, and 7F sheaths, respectively (P = 0.49). None of the 15 patients who underwent surgical treatment suffered long-term vascular or neuropathic complications. Conclusions In our experience, percutaneous BA access was associated with a 10% complication rate with an increased risk of complications associated with increasing sheath size. There was approximately the same incidence of bleeding as thrombosis. For patients who require 6 or 7F sheaths via a BA approach, we recommend more liberal use of open surgical exposure and primary BA repair. A percutaneous brachial artery (BA) approach is a suitable or even favorable alternative to femoral artery access when performing certain endovascular interventions. However, this approach may have a higher complication rate compared to femoral artery access. We analyzed our results using percutaneous BA approach for noncardiac endovascular interventions. Between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2017, BA access was used in 157 cases performed on 136 patients. The procedures included 102 (65%) therapeutic interventions and 55 (35%) diagnostic studies. The vessels studied or treated included lower extremity arteries (48), the aorta and iliac arteries (45), mesenteric arteries (45), failing arterial revascularizations (24), renal arteries (9), subclavian arteries (8), carotid arteries (2), and visceral aneurysms (2), or in conjunction with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), fenestrated EVAR, or thoracic EVAR (8). More than 1 vessel was studied or treated in 34 cases. Sheath sizes included 5F in 38 (24%) cases, 6F in 93 (59%) cases, and 7F in 26 (17%) cases. Percutaneous puncture was utilized in 142 (90.4%) cases and planned surgical exposure with primary closure of the BA in 15 (9.6%) cases (10, 7F; 4, 6F; 1, 5F). Manual compression was used for hemostasis at the conclusion of all percutaneous cases. There were 2 (1.3%; 2/157 cases) deaths in the perioperative period, one due to myocardial infarction and the other from mesenteric ischemia. Access site complications occurred in 10.6% (15/142) of percutaneous cases, which required open surgical repair for bleeding (8) and BA thrombosis (7). There was an increased risk of complications with increasing sheath size in the percutaneous approach: 5.4% (2/37), 12.4% (11/89), and 12.5% (2/16) for 5F, 6F, and 7F sheaths, respectively (P = 0.49). None of the 15 patients who underwent surgical treatment suffered long-term vascular or neuropathic complications. In our experience, percutaneous BA access was associated with a 10% complication rate with an increased risk of complications associated with increasing sheath size. There was approximately the same incidence of bleeding as thrombosis. For patients who require 6 or 7F sheaths via a BA approach, we recommend more liberal use of open surgical exposure and primary BA repair." @default.
• W2896449871 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896449871 creator A5023383086 @default.
• W2896449871 creator A5030184963 @default.
• W2896449871 creator A5038963373 @default.
• W2896449871 creator A5047741744 @default.
• W2896449871 creator A5082449593 @default.
• W2896449871 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2896449871 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2896449871 title "Outcomes of Brachial Artery Access for Endovascular Interventions" @default.
• W2896449871 cites W1950427249 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W1996954755 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2074128862 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2085901868 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2101660506 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2102841944 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2114622029 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2144384223 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2147327928 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2260346312 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2310592419 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W23110405 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2313177379 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2515674006 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2605680020 @default.
• W2896449871 cites W2797939703 @default.
• W2896449871 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.07.061" @default.
• W2896449871 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30347242" @default.
• W2896449871 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2896449871 type Work @default.
• W2896449871 sameAs 2896449871 @default.
• W2896449871 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W2896449871 countsByYear W28964498712019 @default.
• W2896449871 countsByYear W28964498712020 @default.
• W2896449871 countsByYear W28964498712021 @default.
• W2896449871 countsByYear W28964498712022 @default.
• W2896449871 countsByYear W28964498712023 @default.
• W2896449871 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896449871 hasAuthorship W2896449871A5023383086 @default.
• W2896449871 hasAuthorship W2896449871A5030184963 @default.
• W2896449871 hasAuthorship W2896449871A5038963373 @default.
• W2896449871 hasAuthorship W2896449871A5047741744 @default.
• W2896449871 hasAuthorship W2896449871A5082449593 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2775901891 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2776543907 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2776634560 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2777604165 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2778589496 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2779495589 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2779723990 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2779993416 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C126322002 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C126838900 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C141071460 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2775901891 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2776098176 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2776543907 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2776634560 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2777604165 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2778589496 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2779495589 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2779723990 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2779993416 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2780091579 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C2780813298 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C31174226 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C71924100 @default.
• W2896449871 hasConceptScore W2896449871C84393581 @default.
• W2896449871 hasLocation W28964498711 @default.
• W2896449871 hasLocation W28964498712 @default.
• W2896449871 hasOpenAccess W2896449871 @default.
• W2896449871 hasPrimaryLocation W28964498711 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W1993797307 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W2016805626 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W2074858665 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W2113129318 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W2115543243 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W2465373232 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W2914691424 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W2945227424 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W4280631321 @default.
• W2896449871 hasRelatedWork W4379375601 @default.
• W2896449871 hasVolume "56" @default.
• W2896449871 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2896449871 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2896449871 magId "2896449871" @default.
• W2896449871 workType "article" @default.