FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896571736> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896571736 endingPage "1029" @default.
• W2896571736 startingPage "1023" @default.
• W2896571736 abstract "Objectives To evaluate the difference in cancer detection rate between targeted biopsy of focal lesions detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and systematic sextant biopsy. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between April 2014 and April 2017 and classified them into three groups: (1) sextant biopsy group patients underwent systematic sextant biopsy without evaluation of focal lesions on TRUS (n = 400), (2) focal lesion group patients underwent targeted biopsy for TRUS-detected lesions (n = 496), and (3) nonfocal lesion group patients had no TRUS-detected focal lesions (n = 222). Positive biopsy rates were compared using Chi-square tests between biopsy groups in all patients and two subgroups divided by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 10 ng/mL. Results The positive biopsy rate decreased in the order of the focal lesion group, the sextant biopsy group, and the nonfocal lesion group. All prostate cancers and prostate cancers with a Gleason score ≥7 were detected more frequently among patients with PSA ≤10 ng/mL in the focal lesion group than in the sextant biopsy group ( p = 0.008 and 0.007, respectively) and less frequently among patients with PSA >10 ng/mL in the nonfocal lesion group than in the sextant biopsy group ( p = 0.007 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion In conclusion, searching focal lesion by TRUS is useful for improving the positive biopsy rate and risk stratification of PCa compared to systematic sextant biopsy without careful TRUS examination. To evaluate the difference in cancer detection rate between targeted biopsy of focal lesions detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and systematic sextant biopsy. This retrospective study included patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between April 2014 and April 2017 and classified them into three groups: (1) sextant biopsy group patients underwent systematic sextant biopsy without evaluation of focal lesions on TRUS (n = 400), (2) focal lesion group patients underwent targeted biopsy for TRUS-detected lesions (n = 496), and (3) nonfocal lesion group patients had no TRUS-detected focal lesions (n = 222). Positive biopsy rates were compared using Chi-square tests between biopsy groups in all patients and two subgroups divided by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 10 ng/mL. The positive biopsy rate decreased in the order of the focal lesion group, the sextant biopsy group, and the nonfocal lesion group. All prostate cancers and prostate cancers with a Gleason score ≥7 were detected more frequently among patients with PSA ≤10 ng/mL in the focal lesion group than in the sextant biopsy group ( p = 0.008 and 0.007, respectively) and less frequently among patients with PSA >10 ng/mL in the nonfocal lesion group than in the sextant biopsy group ( p = 0.007 and 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, searching focal lesion by TRUS is useful for improving the positive biopsy rate and risk stratification of PCa compared to systematic sextant biopsy without careful TRUS examination." @default.
• W2896571736 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896571736 creator A5056891997 @default.
• W2896571736 creator A5090324143 @default.
• W2896571736 creator A5091022795 @default.
• W2896571736 date "2019-08-01" @default.
• W2896571736 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2896571736 title "The Role of Transrectal Ultrasound for Finding Focal Lesions in Prostate Cancer Detection Compared to Systematic Sextant Biopsy" @default.
• W2896571736 cites W1508381254 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W1545430154 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W1971442767 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W1978216056 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2019597341 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2023232494 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2041812982 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2056153636 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2114762214 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2141183733 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2166418518 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2253068469 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2511949746 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2577453388 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2587136869 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2786814545 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W2793905111 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W778629108 @default.
• W2896571736 cites W853957662 @default.
• W2896571736 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.014" @default.
• W2896571736 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30316704" @default.
• W2896571736 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2896571736 type Work @default.
• W2896571736 sameAs 2896571736 @default.
• W2896571736 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2896571736 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896571736 hasAuthorship W2896571736A5056891997 @default.
• W2896571736 hasAuthorship W2896571736A5090324143 @default.
• W2896571736 hasAuthorship W2896571736A5091022795 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C2781217009 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C2781406297 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C121608353 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C126322002 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C126838900 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C126894567 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C141071460 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C143753070 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C2775934546 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C2776235491 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C2780192828 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C2781156865 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C2781217009 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C2781406297 @default.
• W2896571736 hasConceptScore W2896571736C71924100 @default.
• W2896571736 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2896571736 hasLocation W28965717361 @default.
• W2896571736 hasLocation W28965717362 @default.
• W2896571736 hasOpenAccess W2896571736 @default.
• W2896571736 hasPrimaryLocation W28965717361 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W1979374145 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W2041562209 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W2049045266 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W2099948048 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W2102167265 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W2148869351 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W2390982334 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W2417874801 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W3082324229 @default.
• W2896571736 hasRelatedWork W4249064981 @default.
• W2896571736 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2896571736 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2896571736 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2896571736 magId "2896571736" @default.
• W2896571736 workType "article" @default.