FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896588651> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896588651 abstract "Introduction: The English NHS is implementing integrated care models across primary, community and secondary care, and between health and social care systems.  These may achieve improvements to quality, safety and cost, but they do not directly address the frequently fragmented and episodic care of patients within hospital settings, particularly those patients with complex co-morbidities.  There are examples, however, of hospital-based integrated clinical care models which could address this deficit.  Mayo Clinic USA, for example, offers highly integrated, multi-specialty clinical care.  We report on two phases of a research project which aims to determine if adoption of something akin to the Mayo Model would be feasible in English NHS hospitals, to the benefit of patients and staff. Methods:  Phase 1 used a rapid review to assess recent literature concerning the Mayo Model and links between this and the organisation’s performance and patient outcomes.  Phase 2 consisted of semi-structured interviews N=13 conducted with a range of senior clinical and non-clinical staff in a large English NHS teaching hospital.  The question schedule addressed general understanding of integrated clinical care, and sought views on barriers and enablers to implementing a Mayo-type integrated care model in English NHS hospitals. Results:  Literature concerning the distinctive features of the Mayo Model is limited in scope and largely confined to ‘grey’ sources.  We found only two peer-reviewed articles which offer critical analysis of the contribution of the Mayo Model to the performance of the organisation.  Analysis of interview data suggests that 1 many NHS hospital physicians and managers are frustrated by the fragmented service offered to multi-morbid patients; 2 the same group sees significant potential in a more holistic, multi-specialty coordinated care model, and understand how in-hospital care could change to meet this vision. Discussion:  Despite the paucity of peer-reviewed literature concerning links between the distinctive Mayo Model and performance indicators such as patient outcomes, cost containment and staff and patient satisfaction, there are indications that this model may offer something which is currently absent from in-hospital care in the English NHS.  Our interview data shows that clinical and non-clinical hospital staff strongly believe that there is a place for better coordinated, multi-specialty care, particularly in the case of patients who are disadvantaged by repeated journeys between primary and secondary care. Conclusions:  Given the urgent need to improve care for non-emergency patients who attend hospitals in the English NHS, we consider it worthwhile to explore the possibility of trialling a Mayo Clinic-style care model in the environment of English NHS hospitals.  There are barriers to implementing this approach to in-hospital care, but with appropriate resourcing and support they are not insurmountable. Limitations:  The interview data covered a broad range of professional roles, but was confined to one NHS hospital. Future research:   We suggest that piloting a Mayo-type care model in one or more English NHS hospitals could be accompanied by a rigorous evaluation of the effects on patient outcomes, the patient experience and staff satisfaction." @default.
• W2896588651 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896588651 creator A5034486810 @default.
• W2896588651 creator A5044721315 @default.
• W2896588651 creator A5054996878 @default.
• W2896588651 creator A5087846380 @default.
• W2896588651 date "2018-10-23" @default.
• W2896588651 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2896588651 title "Is there a place for the Mayo Model of Integrated Clinical Care in the English NHS?" @default.
• W2896588651 doi "https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.s2268" @default.
• W2896588651 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896588651 type Work @default.
• W2896588651 sameAs 2896588651 @default.
• W2896588651 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2896588651 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896588651 hasAuthorship W2896588651A5034486810 @default.
• W2896588651 hasAuthorship W2896588651A5044721315 @default.
• W2896588651 hasAuthorship W2896588651A5054996878 @default.
• W2896588651 hasAuthorship W2896588651A5087846380 @default.
• W2896588651 hasBestOaLocation W28965886511 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C20387591 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C2779541514 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C68387754 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C159110408 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C160735492 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C162324750 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C17744445 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C187736073 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C199360897 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C199539241 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C20387591 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C2778012447 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C2779541514 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C41008148 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C512399662 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C68387754 @default.
• W2896588651 hasConceptScore W2896588651C71924100 @default.
• W2896588651 hasLocation W28965886511 @default.
• W2896588651 hasOpenAccess W2896588651 @default.
• W2896588651 hasPrimaryLocation W28965886511 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W1494434361 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2078311535 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2090694452 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2393323857 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2422447166 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2431527647 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2470004852 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2893716391 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W2907653122 @default.
• W2896588651 hasRelatedWork W3197769154 @default.
• W2896588651 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2896588651 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2896588651 magId "2896588651" @default.
• W2896588651 workType "article" @default.