Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896665038> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2896665038 endingPage "e0204887" @default.
- W2896665038 startingPage "e0204887" @default.
- W2896665038 abstract "Recently, it has been questioned if minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer was surgically successful. We decided to perform a meta-analysis to determine if minimally invasive surgery is adequate to obtain a complete resection for curable rectal cancer.A systematic search pertaining to evaluation between laparoscopic and open rectal resection for rectal cancer was performed until 30th November 2016 in the electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE), using the following search terms in all possible combinations: rectal cancer, laparoscopy, minimally invasive and open surgery. Outcomes analyzed were number of clear Distal Resection Margins (DRM or DM), complete Circumferential Resection Margins (CRM) and complete, nearly complete and incomplete Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) and of patients who received laparoscopic or open treatment for rectal cancer.12 articles were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of successful surgical resection was similar between open and laparoscopic surgery. About distance from distal margin of the specimen, clear CRM and complete TME there were no statistically significant difference between the two groups (MD = -0.090 cm, p = 0.364, 95% CI -0.283, 0.104; OR = 1.032, p = 0.821, 95% CI 0.784, 1.360; OR = 0.933, p = 0.720, 95% CI 0.638, 1.364, respectively). The analysis of nearly complete TME showed a significant difference between the two groups (OR = 1.407, p = 0.006, 95% CI 1.103, 1.795), while the analysis of incomplete TME showed a non-significant difference (OR = 1.010, p = 0.964, 95% CI 0.664, 1.534).By pooling together data from 5 RCTs and 7 nRCTs, we are able to provide evidence of safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery. Waiting for further randomized clinical trials, our results are encouraging to introduce laparoscopic rectal resection in daily practice." @default.
- W2896665038 created "2018-10-26" @default.
- W2896665038 creator A5006344847 @default.
- W2896665038 creator A5008542209 @default.
- W2896665038 creator A5021590158 @default.
- W2896665038 creator A5069814726 @default.
- W2896665038 creator A5072867698 @default.
- W2896665038 creator A5079462590 @default.
- W2896665038 date "2018-10-09" @default.
- W2896665038 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2896665038 title "Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis" @default.
- W2896665038 cites W1537972189 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W1607229324 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W1926888387 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2011375064 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2029108259 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2033585778 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2077421021 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2098923148 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2104029004 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2112563529 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2125056229 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2138418681 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2152883689 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2156098321 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2156155744 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2169731203 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2269492214 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2333025355 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2411142619 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W246286872 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2552055927 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2565167691 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2588681363 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2765757058 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2766506046 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2767650375 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2768521646 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W2805908456 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W4294215472 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W640680347 @default.
- W2896665038 cites W891610663 @default.
- W2896665038 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204887" @default.
- W2896665038 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6177141" @default.
- W2896665038 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30300377" @default.
- W2896665038 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2896665038 type Work @default.
- W2896665038 sameAs 2896665038 @default.
- W2896665038 citedByCount "19" @default.
- W2896665038 countsByYear W28966650382019 @default.
- W2896665038 countsByYear W28966650382020 @default.
- W2896665038 countsByYear W28966650382021 @default.
- W2896665038 countsByYear W28966650382022 @default.
- W2896665038 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2896665038 hasAuthorship W2896665038A5006344847 @default.
- W2896665038 hasAuthorship W2896665038A5008542209 @default.
- W2896665038 hasAuthorship W2896665038A5021590158 @default.
- W2896665038 hasAuthorship W2896665038A5069814726 @default.
- W2896665038 hasAuthorship W2896665038A5072867698 @default.
- W2896665038 hasAuthorship W2896665038A5079462590 @default.
- W2896665038 hasBestOaLocation W28966650381 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C2777201421 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C2778132481 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C121608353 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C126322002 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C141071460 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C159110652 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C2776111594 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C2777201421 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C2778132481 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C2780047204 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C526805850 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C61434518 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C71924100 @default.
- W2896665038 hasConceptScore W2896665038C95190672 @default.
- W2896665038 hasIssue "10" @default.
- W2896665038 hasLocation W28966650381 @default.
- W2896665038 hasLocation W28966650382 @default.
- W2896665038 hasLocation W28966650383 @default.
- W2896665038 hasLocation W28966650384 @default.
- W2896665038 hasLocation W28966650385 @default.
- W2896665038 hasOpenAccess W2896665038 @default.
- W2896665038 hasPrimaryLocation W28966650381 @default.
- W2896665038 hasRelatedWork W2050609593 @default.
- W2896665038 hasRelatedWork W2126283592 @default.
- W2896665038 hasRelatedWork W2357376993 @default.
- W2896665038 hasRelatedWork W2400149999 @default.