FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896688217> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896688217 endingPage "e30" @default.
• W2896688217 startingPage "e30" @default.
• W2896688217 abstract "Marital status has been widely demonstrated to have influence on the outcome of cancer treatment. Compared to marital status, patient companionship may be more meaningful in daily practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patient companionship on treatment outcome and treatment tolerance in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Retrospectively, patients with esophageal cancer pursuing dCRT from 1/1/05 to 1/1/16 were included. Patients’ marital status, companionship in each visit, baseline performance status, changes of albumin and weight, tumor response after therapy, and overall survival were reviewed. Patients were divided by the frequency of companionship (< /≥50% visits). Patients’ characteristics, treatment outcome and tolerance, and overall survival were compared by χ2, Wilcoxon-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Of 59 patients (39 males and 20 females with mean age of 66.0 years), 35 patients had frequent companionship (≥50%) in all documented visits, while 24 patients were categorized into the group of infrequent companionship. There was no significant difference in ECOG performance status or pre-diagnosis weight loss between the two groups (P=0.44, 0.50 respectively). Patients with frequent companionship maintained their weight better than those with infrequent companionship (median 2.7 kg weight loss vs. 4.9 kg weight loss, P = 0.04, median of weight loss proportion 3.3% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.09). Patients with frequent companionship compared to those with infrequent companionship had a non-significantly greater chance of hospitalization after dCRT (62.9% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.06) due to toxicities of treatment. There was neither a difference in Grade 3/4 leukopenia nor the change in albumin throughout the therapy between the two groups (P = 0.66, 0.42, respectively). No overall survival difference was demonstrated between the two groups (P = 0.98). Although frequent companionship did not show survival benefit in esophageal cancer after dCRT, its effect on treatment tolerance may be favorable in cancer treatment. Patients with companionship may be more likely to seek care if they are more ill and require hospitalization. The specific reasons for these hospitalizations need further investigation." @default.
• W2896688217 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896688217 creator A5025986558 @default.
• W2896688217 creator A5046099985 @default.
• W2896688217 creator A5052907771 @default.
• W2896688217 creator A5054535831 @default.
• W2896688217 creator A5057216068 @default.
• W2896688217 creator A5060146123 @default.
• W2896688217 creator A5069565044 @default.
• W2896688217 date "2018-11-01" @default.
• W2896688217 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2896688217 title "Effect of Patient Companionship on Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiotherapy" @default.
• W2896688217 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.516" @default.
• W2896688217 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896688217 type Work @default.
• W2896688217 sameAs 2896688217 @default.
• W2896688217 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2896688217 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896688217 hasAuthorship W2896688217A5025986558 @default.
• W2896688217 hasAuthorship W2896688217A5046099985 @default.
• W2896688217 hasAuthorship W2896688217A5052907771 @default.
• W2896688217 hasAuthorship W2896688217A5054535831 @default.
• W2896688217 hasAuthorship W2896688217A5057216068 @default.
• W2896688217 hasAuthorship W2896688217A5060146123 @default.
• W2896688217 hasAuthorship W2896688217A5069565044 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C2781354955 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C544821477 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C91034043 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C126322002 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C15744967 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C2781354955 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C2908647359 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C511355011 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C544821477 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C71924100 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C77805123 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C91034043 @default.
• W2896688217 hasConceptScore W2896688217C99454951 @default.
• W2896688217 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2896688217 hasLocation W28966882171 @default.
• W2896688217 hasOpenAccess W2896688217 @default.
• W2896688217 hasPrimaryLocation W28966882171 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W1843434814 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W1983043197 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W2060627716 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W2063052824 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W2132411825 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W2531609953 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W2790736623 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W2981576095 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W3116363985 @default.
• W2896688217 hasRelatedWork W4322705558 @default.
• W2896688217 hasVolume "102" @default.
• W2896688217 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2896688217 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2896688217 magId "2896688217" @default.
• W2896688217 workType "article" @default.