Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896746722> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2896746722 abstract "Abstract In two experiments, we played an audio recording of a conversational exchange for N = 224 and N = 144 participants, manipulating the point of interruption (early, late or no interruption = control) and types of interruption (change of subject, disagreement, clarification and agreement) in order to understand their effects on naive observers' perception (Study 1) and evaluation of interruptions (Study 2). Results show that: early rather than late interruptions, changing the subject rather than disagreement, disagreement rather than clarification, and clarification rather than agreement were regarded more as interruptions and were evaluated more negatively; although both criteria—type and point of interruption—showed significant effects, naive observers used the point of interruption more than the type of interruption for identifying and evaluating the interruptions. Valence and perception of a conversational transition were correlated: in the interruption condition and even in non-interruption conditions, the more a turn taking was evaluated as negative, the more it was perceived to be an interruption. Finally, the results did not support the gender hypothesis. Results were interpreted in terms of politeness theory and considering cultural and contextual factors." @default.
- W2896746722 created "2018-10-26" @default.
- W2896746722 creator A5036469588 @default.
- W2896746722 creator A5048968549 @default.
- W2896746722 creator A5070925471 @default.
- W2896746722 creator A5087860651 @default.
- W2896746722 date "2018-12-01" @default.
- W2896746722 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2896746722 title "Which criteria do naïve people use for identifying and evaluating different kinds of interruptions?" @default.
- W2896746722 cites W13884667 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1579194959 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1588914778 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W160869212 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1659701168 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1949678325 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1976795036 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1983939847 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1988450211 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1989405085 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1997257155 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W1999401498 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2000516018 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2003380544 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2010649089 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2016171193 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2022378030 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2025217671 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2025909112 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2040673272 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2044714353 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2053154970 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2056667473 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2064304524 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2072358915 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2074813973 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2075675944 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2084669380 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2088068039 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2108343227 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2120614088 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2127813287 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2129090275 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2141209373 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2145916567 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2150290224 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2153190547 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2153806843 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2155456400 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2159035740 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2162634167 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2414468490 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2475918877 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2500958524 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2614211324 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2981940596 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W624234099 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2771255852 @default.
- W2896746722 cites W2774321710 @default.
- W2896746722 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.016" @default.
- W2896746722 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2896746722 type Work @default.
- W2896746722 sameAs 2896746722 @default.
- W2896746722 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W2896746722 countsByYear W28967467222019 @default.
- W2896746722 countsByYear W28967467222020 @default.
- W2896746722 countsByYear W28967467222021 @default.
- W2896746722 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2896746722 hasAuthorship W2896746722A5036469588 @default.
- W2896746722 hasAuthorship W2896746722A5048968549 @default.
- W2896746722 hasAuthorship W2896746722A5070925471 @default.
- W2896746722 hasAuthorship W2896746722A5087860651 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C168900304 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C28719098 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C58393919 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C61123122 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C121332964 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C138885662 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C15744967 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C168900304 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C169760540 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C180747234 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C2524010 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C26760741 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C28719098 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C33923547 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C41895202 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C58393919 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C61123122 @default.
- W2896746722 hasConceptScore W2896746722C62520636 @default.