Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896790246> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2896790246 endingPage "1560" @default.
- W2896790246 startingPage "1560" @default.
- W2896790246 abstract "Estimates of weight regain following bariatric surgery vary widely.To describe weight regain after reaching nadir weight following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery and compare weight regain measures for association with outcomes.Prospective cohort study of 2458 adults who underwent bariatric surgery at 10 hospitals in 6 US cities between March 2006 and April 2009. Assessments were conducted within 30 days' presurgery, at 6 months' postsurgery, and then annually until January 2015. Of the 1703 participants who underwent RYGB surgery, 1406 (83%) were followed up for 5 years or longer and had 5 or more weight measurements (excluding those who died or underwent surgical reversal).Weight regain assessed by 5 continuous measures (weight in kilograms, body mass index [BMI], percentage of presurgery weight, percentage of nadir weight, and percentage of maximum weight lost) and 8 dichotomous measures (per established thresholds) were compared in relation to clinical outcomes based on statistical significance, magnitude of association, and model fit.Progression of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension and declines in physical and mental health-related quality of life and satisfaction with surgery.Among the 1406 participants who underwent RYGB surgery, the median age was 47 years (25th-75th percentile, 38-55 years) and the median BMI was 46.3 (25th-75th percentile, 42.3-51.8) prior to surgery. Most participants were female (80.3%) and white (85.6%). The median follow-up was 6.6 years (25th-75th percentile, 5.9-7.0 years). The median percentage of maximum weight loss was 37.4% (25th-75th percentile, 31.6%-43.3%) of presurgery weight and occurred a median of 2.0 years after RYGB surgery (25th-75th percentile, 1.0-3.2 years). The rate of weight regain was highest during the first year after reaching nadir weight, but weight regain continued to increase throughout follow-up (range, a median of 9.5% of maximum weight lost [25th-75th percentile, 4.7%-17.2%] to 26.8% of maximum weight lost [25th-75th percentile, 16.7%-41.5%] 1 to 5 years after reaching nadir weight). The percentage of participants who regained weight depended on threshold (eg, 5 years after nadir weight, 43.6% regained ≥5 BMI points; 50.2% regained ≥15% of nadir weight; and 67.3% regained ≥20% of maximum weight lost). Compared with other continuous weight regain measures, the percentage of maximum weight lost had the strongest association and best model fit for all outcomes except hyperlipidemia, which had a slightly stronger association with BMI. Of the dichotomous measures, 20% or greater of maximum weight lost performed better or similarly with most of the outcomes, and was the second best measure for hyperlipidemia (after ≥10 kg of weight) and hypertension (after ≥10% of maximum weight lost).Among a large cohort of adults who underwent RYGB surgery, weight regain quantified as percentage of maximum weight lost performed better for association with most clinical outcomes than the alternatives examined. These findings may inform standardizing the measurement of weight regain in studies of bariatric surgery." @default.
- W2896790246 created "2018-10-26" @default.
- W2896790246 creator A5027689213 @default.
- W2896790246 creator A5037133218 @default.
- W2896790246 creator A5050592436 @default.
- W2896790246 creator A5065585185 @default.
- W2896790246 creator A5091141577 @default.
- W2896790246 date "2018-10-16" @default.
- W2896790246 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W2896790246 title "Comparison of the Performance of Common Measures of Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery for Association With Clinical Outcomes" @default.
- W2896790246 cites W1551222890 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W1977733462 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W1986183494 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W1987282451 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2005468217 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2027524238 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2037400832 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2045485937 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2062675723 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2067382379 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2068618758 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2071537801 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2073118983 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2087050260 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2089725558 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2094282883 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2095442012 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2107390135 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2110791445 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2116705629 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2123172955 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2154914473 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2172054740 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2210800282 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2285979992 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2287970482 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2312536395 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2328169532 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2397108324 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2479950761 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2544157456 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2594365695 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2607031541 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2734675357 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2755288104 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2770837559 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W2771736595 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W4211177544 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W4238251256 @default.
- W2896790246 cites W4239096779 @default.
- W2896790246 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14433" @default.
- W2896790246 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6233795" @default.
- W2896790246 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30326125" @default.
- W2896790246 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2896790246 type Work @default.
- W2896790246 sameAs 2896790246 @default.
- W2896790246 citedByCount "183" @default.
- W2896790246 countsByYear W28967902462018 @default.
- W2896790246 countsByYear W28967902462019 @default.
- W2896790246 countsByYear W28967902462020 @default.
- W2896790246 countsByYear W28967902462021 @default.
- W2896790246 countsByYear W28967902462022 @default.
- W2896790246 countsByYear W28967902462023 @default.
- W2896790246 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2896790246 hasAuthorship W2896790246A5027689213 @default.
- W2896790246 hasAuthorship W2896790246A5037133218 @default.
- W2896790246 hasAuthorship W2896790246A5050592436 @default.
- W2896790246 hasAuthorship W2896790246A5065585185 @default.
- W2896790246 hasAuthorship W2896790246A5091141577 @default.
- W2896790246 hasBestOaLocation W28967902461 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C122048520 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C136269033 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C3017894415 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C3019402062 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C544821477 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C105795698 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C122048520 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C126322002 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C136269033 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C141071460 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C188816634 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C2780221984 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C3017894415 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C3019402062 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C33923547 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C511355011 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C544821477 @default.
- W2896790246 hasConceptScore W2896790246C71924100 @default.
- W2896790246 hasIssue "15" @default.
- W2896790246 hasLocation W28967902461 @default.