FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896850549> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896850549 abstract "INTRODUCTION:Stroke, also known as cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is an acute neurologicinjury in which the blood supply to a part of the brain is interrupted. It is reported that 1.2%of total deaths occur in India due to stroke. Stroke is the 3rd leading cause of death and the 2nd leading cause of disability. Major risk factors are Hypertension, Heart disease and Diabetes. Apart from these, other risk factors for stroke are cigarette smoking, blood cholesterols, oral contraceptives, obesity, alcohol, social deprivation and physical inactivity. Recent studies showed that the age adjusted annual incidence rate was 105 per 100,000 in the urban community and 262 per 100,000 in the rural community.Stroke represented 1.2% of total deaths in India.OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the effectiveness of Bobath approach in gait training and Balanceamong chronic stroke patients.To evaluate the effectiveness of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitationin Gait training and balance among chronic patients.To compare the effects of Bobath approach and Proprioceptive NeuromusularFacilitation Techniques in Gait training and Balance among chronic stroke patients.METHODOLOGY:Study Design: Pre- test and post – test experimental design. comparative study.Study Settings: The study was conducted at Outpatient department, Prakash hospital, Udumalpet.Sample Size: 20 Patients were selected as samples for the study and divided into two groups.Criteria for Selection:Inclusion Criteria:Both Gender,Patient between 50 – 60 years,Brunstrom stage -3,Patients with ACA ischemic infarction of more than 6 months post – strokeduration.Exclusion criteria:Patients with severe disabling arthritis,Patients with any cardiac disease,Cognitive dysfunction,Movement disorder patients,Non co-operative patients,Any other neurological deficits like Parkinson’s disease,Past history of seizures,Visual, Cognitive - Perceptual problems.RESULTS :20 stroke patients was treated for one session a day like that 6 weeks. Before starting thetreatment, Assessed by Wisconsin gait scale and Tinnetti balance assessment toolAnalysis of Dependent Variable of bobath approach in Group A: The calculatedpaired ‘t’ value the ‘t’ table value is 13.44 at 0.005 level of significance. Hence, thecalculated ‘t’ value is greater than the table ‘t’ value there is significant difference in upperextremity function following motor relearning programme with trunk restraint among strokesubjects.Analysis of Dependent variable of proprioceptive neuromuscular technique GroupB:The calculated paired ‘t’ value is 19.44 and the table ‘t’ value is 3.250 at 0.005 level ofsignificant. Hence, the calculated ‘t’ value is greater than the table ‘t’ value there is significantdifference in upper extremity function following motor relearning program in strokesubjects.CONCLUSION:An experimental study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of bobathapproach and proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation techniques in gait training andbalance among chronic stroke patients.The study was conducted on 20 subjects. The subjects were divided into two groups,Group A and Group B. Group A received Bobath approach. Group B received ProprioceptiveNeuromuscular Facilitation. The study was conducted to compare effectiveness of Bobathapproach and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in improving Gait training andbalance in chronic stroke patients.The statistical result shows that there is improvement in both groups. But whencomparing both it was found that Proprioceptive neuromuscular Facilitation is more effectivethan bobath approach among chronic stroke patients." @default.
• W2896850549 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896850549 creator A5075933849 @default.
• W2896850549 date "2016-04-01" @default.
• W2896850549 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2896850549 title "A Comparative study on the Effectiveness of Bobath Approach and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques in Gait Training and Balance among Chronic Stroke Patients" @default.
• W2896850549 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2896850549 type Work @default.
• W2896850549 sameAs 2896850549 @default.
• W2896850549 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2896850549 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2896850549 hasAuthorship W2896850549A5075933849 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C151800584 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C168031717 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C171790689 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C127413603 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C151800584 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C168031717 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C171790689 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C1862650 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C2778818304 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C2780645631 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C71924100 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C78519656 @default.
• W2896850549 hasConceptScore W2896850549C99508421 @default.
• W2896850549 hasLocation W28968505491 @default.
• W2896850549 hasOpenAccess W2896850549 @default.
• W2896850549 hasPrimaryLocation W28968505491 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W1518972833 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2059023012 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2061464141 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2404461032 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2810522107 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2810949569 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2884861971 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2915256970 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2922265045 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2954839144 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3008856538 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3011889343 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3012162996 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3033397112 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3111230267 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3115641450 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3127679435 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3205843307 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W3206588252 @default.
• W2896850549 hasRelatedWork W2911835353 @default.
• W2896850549 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2896850549 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2896850549 magId "2896850549" @default.
• W2896850549 workType "dissertation" @default.