FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896862961> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896862961 endingPage "e0205223" @default.
• W2896862961 startingPage "e0205223" @default.
• W2896862961 abstract "Utility scores are integral to health economics decision-making. Typically, utility scores have not been scored or developed with mental health service users. The aims of this study were to i) collaborate with service users to develop descriptions of five mental health states (psychosis, depression, eating disorder, medication side effects and self-harm); ii) explore feasibility and acceptability of using scenario-based health states in an e-survey; iii) evaluate which utility measures (standard gamble (SG), time trade off (TTO) and rating scale (RS)) are preferred; and iv) determine how different participant groups discriminate between the health scenarios and rank them.This was a co-produced mixed methods cross-sectional online survey. Utility scores were generated using the SG, TTO and RS methods; difficulty of the completing each method, markers of acceptability and participants' preference were also assessed.A total of 119 participants (58%) fully completed the survey. For any given health state, SG consistently generated higher utility scores compared to RS and for some health states higher also than TTO (i.e. SG produces inflated utility scores relative to RS and TTO). Results suggest that different utility measures produce different evaluations of described health states. The TTO was preferred by all participant groups over the SG. The three participant groups scored four (of five) health scenarios comparably. Psychosis scored as the worst health state to live with while medication side-effects were viewed more positively than other scenarios (depression, eating disorders, self-harm) by all participant groups. However, there was a difference in how the depression scenario was scored, with service users giving depression a lower utility score compared to other groups.Mental health state scenarios used to generate utility scores can be co-produced and are well received by a broad range of participants. Utility valuations using SG, TTO and RS were feasible for use with service users, carers, healthcare professionals and members of the general public. Future studies of utility scores in psychiatry should aim to include mental health service users as both co-investigators and respondents." @default.
• W2896862961 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896862961 creator A5027495927 @default.
• W2896862961 creator A5028984464 @default.
• W2896862961 creator A5035697782 @default.
• W2896862961 creator A5055086390 @default.
• W2896862961 creator A5071658432 @default.
• W2896862961 creator A5077929512 @default.
• W2896862961 creator A5085655389 @default.
• W2896862961 date "2018-10-23" @default.
• W2896862961 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2896862961 title "What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey" @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1491738424 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1963655754 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1964880708 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1971241056 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1971372810 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1981436378 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1986485564 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W199126937 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W1999165820 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2013578576 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2024683988 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2029294919 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2032092106 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2039907854 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2045915759 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2046005311 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2046278865 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2051593700 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2051610478 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2085378460 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2098082628 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2106078061 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2106375796 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2112361650 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2122866942 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2130554465 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2131719895 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2161786380 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2168395707 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2418313215 @default.
• W2896862961 cites W2502386956 @default.
• W2896862961 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205223" @default.
• W2896862961 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6198969" @default.
• W2896862961 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30352071" @default.
• W2896862961 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896862961 type Work @default.
• W2896862961 sameAs 2896862961 @default.
• W2896862961 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2896862961 countsByYear W28968629612020 @default.
• W2896862961 countsByYear W28968629612022 @default.
• W2896862961 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896862961 hasAuthorship W2896862961A5027495927 @default.
• W2896862961 hasAuthorship W2896862961A5028984464 @default.
• W2896862961 hasAuthorship W2896862961A5035697782 @default.
• W2896862961 hasAuthorship W2896862961A5055086390 @default.
• W2896862961 hasAuthorship W2896862961A5071658432 @default.
• W2896862961 hasAuthorship W2896862961A5077929512 @default.
• W2896862961 hasAuthorship W2896862961A5085655389 @default.
• W2896862961 hasBestOaLocation W28968629611 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C2777491762 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C118552586 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C134362201 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C138496976 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C138816342 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C15744967 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C159110408 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C160735492 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C162324750 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C175444787 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C2777363581 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C2777491762 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C2779951463 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C2781249084 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C50522688 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C70410870 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C71924100 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C77805123 @default.
• W2896862961 hasConceptScore W2896862961C83849319 @default.
• W2896862961 hasIssue "10" @default.

• next