FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896874777> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896874777 endingPage "1529853" @default.
• W2896874777 startingPage "1529853" @default.
• W2896874777 abstract "Municipal solid waste (MSW) is a natural accrual in various communities resulting from daily activities, which offers challenges and opportunities. Developed countries lean towards “upstream avoidance” type of solutions, while less developed countries use “downstream remediation” solutions. In between these two options, many hybrid solutions involve triage and final disposal of post-treated reduced MSW mass.The aim of the present article is to briefly review the evolution of policies related to MSW, to address an illustrative case of a recent crisis in Lebanon, and to present the development of a multivariate analysis model on public attitudes towards MSW management. It explores incineration with air pollution control and energy recovery. Non-incineration solutions, including anaerobic digestion, may be more appealing provided the full process, its byproducts and risks, are better understood. Furthermore, the latter solution requires a higher level of investment, expertise, continuous quality improvement and supervision, especially in light of public management weaknesses in less developed countries.A multivariate linear regression analysis model is developed and presented to describe public attitudes regarding MSW management. Linear regression was used to model a direct relationship between a response variable and several explanatory variables. A simplifying assumption is made to test the attractiveness of incineration with energy recovery (IER) including a process for air pollution control. In the multivariate analysis, the dependent variable is a composite index that describes the extent to which respondents agree with a potential IER solution. The independent variables include (1) the extent of public awareness-building about upstream triage, (2) privatization, (3) quality management in daily operations, (4) challenges in implementation and (5) reliability of public management authorities. The multivariate analysis showed that there is a statistically significant and positive correlation with a requisite quality in daily operations, and in technological upfront investment. It showed a statistically significant and negative correlation with the reliability of public management and privatization. As for public awareness about upstream household level triage, there was no statistically significant correlation. This last result seems counter-intuitive, but it may be due to the fact that respondents have low expectations about the impact of their actions on government decisions. The general public, faced with socio-economic problems, may not see household triage as a determining factor. Public perception is that triage ends up with a MSW collection and transport with a mixed dumping at final destination.The analysis shows that prevention is preferred to remediation and that it requires supporting public policies to make it practical, especially in less developed countries. Bio-processes are well-accepted and may become part of the local practice once their long-term effects become better understood to mitigate potential risks. The IER option is perceived as technologically and financially viable and that clear public policies should be designed and implemented." @default.
• W2896874777 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896874777 creator A5022335928 @default.
• W2896874777 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2896874777 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2896874777 title "Public policy and technology choices for municipal solid waste management a recent case in Lebanon" @default.
• W2896874777 cites W1489218762 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W1968312791 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W1968650211 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W1973019649 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W1974564128 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W1981027544 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W1986891604 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2000503393 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2006250614 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2008078821 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2025606826 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2034807735 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2037869996 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2046175752 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2075715623 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2083880726 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2086332270 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2086368803 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2087331830 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2090790522 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2095382670 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2095775854 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2102663706 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2103261115 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2124434199 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2143861413 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2156354142 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2167707737 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2177480711 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2322614236 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2507065199 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2530612611 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2752121827 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2764294862 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2775190676 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2776343421 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2791544919 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2801365234 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W2901162856 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W3124537170 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W3136416585 @default.
• W2896874777 cites W4250351609 @default.
• W2896874777 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2018.1529853" @default.
• W2896874777 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896874777 type Work @default.
• W2896874777 sameAs 2896874777 @default.
• W2896874777 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2896874777 countsByYear W28968747772021 @default.
• W2896874777 countsByYear W28968747772022 @default.
• W2896874777 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896874777 hasAuthorship W2896874777A5022335928 @default.
• W2896874777 hasBestOaLocation W28968747771 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C107053047 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C130751788 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C153240184 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C161584116 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConcept C75779659 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C107053047 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C119857082 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C127413603 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C130751788 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C134560507 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C144133560 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C153240184 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C161584116 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C162324750 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C39432304 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C41008148 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C548081761 @default.
• W2896874777 hasConceptScore W2896874777C75779659 @default.
• W2896874777 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2896874777 hasLocation W28968747771 @default.
• W2896874777 hasLocation W28968747772 @default.
• W2896874777 hasOpenAccess W2896874777 @default.
• W2896874777 hasPrimaryLocation W28968747771 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W1980769218 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W2088202572 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W2092052845 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W2106300660 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W2108433743 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W2145466920 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W2151605859 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W2350632234 @default.
• W2896874777 hasRelatedWork W4298085113 @default.

• next