FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896883758> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896883758 endingPage "1963" @default.
• W2896883758 startingPage "1955" @default.
• W2896883758 abstract "Videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake intubation - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Jia Jiang,1 Da-Xu Ma,1 Bo Li,2 An-Shi Wu,1 Fu-Shan Xue3 1Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; 2Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100010, China; 3Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China Background: Awake intubation with videolaryngoscopy (VL) is a novel method that is drawing more and more attention as an alternative to awake intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB). This meta-analysis is designed to determine the performance of VL compared to the FOB for awake intubation.Methods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and Web of science were searched from database inception until October 30, 2017. Randomized controlled trials comparing VL and FOB for awake intubation were selected. The primary outcome was the overall success rate. Rev-Man 5.3 software was used to perform the pooled analysis and assess the risk of bias for each eligible study. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of evidence for all outcomes.Results: Six studies (446 patients) were included in the review for data extraction. Pooled analysis did not show any difference in the overall success rate by using VL and FOB (relative risk [RR], 1.00; P=0.99; high-quality evidence). There was no heterogeneity among studies (I2=0). Subgroup analyses showed no differences between two groups through nasal (RR, 1.00; P=1.00; high-quality evidence) and oral intubations (RR, 1.00; P=0.98; high-quality evidence). The intubation time was shorter by using VL than by using FOB (mean difference, -40.4 seconds; P0.05).Conclusion: For awake intubation, VL with a shorter intubation time is as effective and safe as FOB. VL may be a useful alternative to FOB.Keywords: airway management, awake intubation, videolaryngoscopy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, randomized controlled clinical trials, outcomes" @default.
• W2896883758 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896883758 creator A5005702876 @default.
• W2896883758 creator A5007279125 @default.
• W2896883758 creator A5040068154 @default.
• W2896883758 creator A5064100733 @default.
• W2896883758 creator A5081492088 @default.
• W2896883758 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2896883758 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2896883758 title "Videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake intubation &ndash; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" @default.
• W2896883758 cites W108694563 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W148226887 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1527612638 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1719192562 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1828381513 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1951725976 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1970725870 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1971441597 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1972232503 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1979427120 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1981912138 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W1988889934 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2000429854 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2007109098 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2019876353 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2028288667 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2054341831 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2055469806 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2067511414 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2070723759 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2081340617 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2091180034 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2093544523 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2102325787 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2104675861 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2105638621 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2118639124 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2125564244 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2132340127 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2134236426 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2153291324 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2160255243 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2167482370 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2167706320 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2169205464 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2231336712 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2338886612 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2339980682 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2396865353 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2471066990 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2559365430 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2560131732 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2566511357 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2593162182 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2604988517 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2697670902 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W2916841405 @default.
• W2896883758 cites W3022987418 @default.
• W2896883758 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s172783" @default.
• W2896883758 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6197207" @default.
• W2896883758 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30410341" @default.
• W2896883758 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896883758 type Work @default.
• W2896883758 sameAs 2896883758 @default.
• W2896883758 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2896883758 countsByYear W28968837582019 @default.
• W2896883758 countsByYear W28968837582020 @default.
• W2896883758 countsByYear W28968837582021 @default.
• W2896883758 countsByYear W28968837582022 @default.
• W2896883758 countsByYear W28968837582023 @default.
• W2896883758 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896883758 hasAuthorship W2896883758A5005702876 @default.
• W2896883758 hasAuthorship W2896883758A5007279125 @default.
• W2896883758 hasAuthorship W2896883758A5040068154 @default.
• W2896883758 hasAuthorship W2896883758A5064100733 @default.
• W2896883758 hasAuthorship W2896883758A5081492088 @default.
• W2896883758 hasBestOaLocation W28968837581 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C2778304055 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C2779526319 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConceptScore W2896883758C126322002 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConceptScore W2896883758C168563851 @default.
• W2896883758 hasConceptScore W2896883758C17744445 @default.

• next