FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2896965491> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2896965491 endingPage "225016" @default.
• W2896965491 startingPage "225016" @default.
• W2896965491 abstract "In carbon ion therapy treatment planning, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is accounted for by optimization of the RBE-weighted dose (biological dose). The RBE calculation methods currently applied clinically in carbon ion therapy are derived from the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) in Japan and the local effect model (LEM) in Europe. The input parameters of these models are based on fit to experimental data subjected to uncertainties. We therefore performed a sensitivity study of the MKM input parameters, i.e. the domain radius (r d ), the nucleus radius (R n ) and the parameters of the linear quadratic (LQ) model (α x and β). The study was performed with the FLUKA Monte Carlo code, using spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) scenarios in water and a biological dose distribution in a clinical patient case. Comparisons were done between biological doses estimated applying the MKM with parameters based on HSG cells, and with HSG parameters varied separately by ±{5, 25, 50}%. Comparisons were also done between parameter sets from different cell lines (HSG, V79, CHO and T1), as well as versions of the LEM. Of the parameters, r d had the largest impact on the biological dose distribution, especially on the absolute dose values. Increasing this parameter by 25% decreased the biological dose level at the center of a 3 Gy(RBE) SOBP by 14%. Variations in R n only influenced the biological dose distribution towards the particle range, and variations in α x resulted in minor changes in the biological dose, with an increasing impact towards the particle range. β had the overall smallest influence on the SOBPs, but the impact could become more pronounced if alternative (LET dependent) implementations are used. The resulting percentage change in the SOBPs was generally less than the percentage change in the parameters. The patient case showed similar effects as with the SOBPs in water, and parameter variations had similar impact on the biological dose when using the clinical MKM and the general MKM. The clinical LEM calculated the highest biological doses to both tumor and surrounding healthy tissues, with a median target dose (D 50%) of 40.5 Gy(RBE), while the MKM with HSG and V79 parameters resulted in a D 50% of 34.2 and 36.9 Gy(RBE), respectively. In all, the observed change in biological dose distribution due to parameter variations demonstrates the importance of accurate input parameters when applying the MKM in treatment planning." @default.
• W2896965491 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2896965491 creator A5014855456 @default.
• W2896965491 creator A5059143948 @default.
• W2896965491 creator A5061770403 @default.
• W2896965491 creator A5063546647 @default.
• W2896965491 creator A5067582136 @default.
• W2896965491 creator A5077897111 @default.
• W2896965491 date "2018-11-12" @default.
• W2896965491 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2896965491 title "Sensitivity study of the microdosimetric kinetic model parameters for carbon ion radiotherapy" @default.
• W2896965491 cites W1529490909 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W1823727300 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W1847687345 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W1878908785 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W1982645808 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W1994603244 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W1997533204 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2008402836 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2013297982 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2021640456 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2033840245 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2036417164 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2049009416 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2053794675 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2054936929 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2056821457 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2058598384 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2058786682 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2080634330 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2081844303 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2083079551 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2085725677 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2085852226 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2104358865 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2117181072 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2117300059 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2119760747 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2281449838 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2331364782 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2529773975 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2592993854 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2604998704 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2775253323 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2802391107 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W2885829702 @default.
• W2896965491 cites W4249919130 @default.
• W2896965491 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aae8b4" @default.
• W2896965491 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30418940" @default.
• W2896965491 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2896965491 type Work @default.
• W2896965491 sameAs 2896965491 @default.
• W2896965491 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2896965491 countsByYear W28969654912019 @default.
• W2896965491 countsByYear W28969654912020 @default.
• W2896965491 countsByYear W28969654912021 @default.
• W2896965491 countsByYear W28969654912022 @default.
• W2896965491 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2896965491 hasAuthorship W2896965491A5014855456 @default.
• W2896965491 hasAuthorship W2896965491A5059143948 @default.
• W2896965491 hasAuthorship W2896965491A5061770403 @default.
• W2896965491 hasAuthorship W2896965491A5063546647 @default.
• W2896965491 hasAuthorship W2896965491A5067582136 @default.
• W2896965491 hasAuthorship W2896965491A5077897111 @default.
• W2896965491 hasBestOaLocation W28969654912 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C111337013 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C11928243 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C153385146 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C178635117 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C2778418280 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C2780944729 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C2781298738 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C30475298 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C105795698 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C111337013 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C11928243 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C120665830 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C121332964 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C153385146 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C159985019 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C168834538 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C178635117 @default.
• W2896965491 hasConceptScore W2896965491C185544564 @default.

• next