FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897193657> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897193657 endingPage "215025" @default.
• W2897193657 startingPage "215025" @default.
• W2897193657 abstract "Protons with modern pencil-beam scanning delivery are widely used in state-of-the-art radiotherapy. To reduce the unwanted effect of proton range uncertainties, prompt gamma (PG) monitoring is investigated and considered one of the most promising methods for real-time, in vivo range verification. Despite good correlation between the penetration depth of the PG signal and proton range in most cases, mismatch can occur especially because of tissue heterogeneities. Moreover, detectability and reproducibility of the prompt gamma signal critically depends on counting statistics. Nowadays, conventional treatment planning systems do not account for the degree of correlation between dose and PG signal nor the expected PG signal counting statistics, which considerably influences the possibility of a reliable verification of the intended beam range. Hence, in this project, we investigate a new treatment planning approach, in which the spot-by-spot conformities between PG and dose profiles (PG-dose correlation) as well as PG signal detectability and precision are taken into account based on a TPS optimizer. To investigate the feasibility of this idea, a research computational platform, combining Monte Carlo (MC, Geant4) pre-calculated pencil beams with the analytical Matlab-based TPS engine CERR, is used for treatment planning. Geant4 is employed for realistic simulation of the dose delivery and PG generation of all spots in the heterogeneous patient anatomy given by CT images. First of all, a treatment plan is created using a charged particle extension of CERR. Secondly, the PG fall-off positions of all individual pencil beams are evaluated and compared to the 80% distal dose fall-off positions. Thirdly, the PG-dose correlations of all spots are quantified. A new plan, in which a few spots with the best PG-dose correlation are boosted to ensure PG detectability with good precision, is then made. Finally, the optimized plan is fully recalculated on the same patient CT using Geant4, and the result is evaluated considering both plan quality and beam range monitorability. The evaluation shows that the re-optimized treatment plan is comparable to the initial plan in terms of dose distribution, dose averaged LET distribution and robustness, while fulfilling the set statistical conditions for reliable PG monitoring of the few automatically or manually selected spots. The method could thus complement, and for the selected pencil beams even overcome limitations of, alternative suggested approach such as pencil beam aggregation to provide sufficient counting statistics for precise PG range retrieval with good correlation to the treatment dose." @default.
• W2897193657 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5000377815 @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5019429498 @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5027114196 @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5032916705 @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5035151357 @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5038323479 @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5053172359 @default.
• W2897193657 creator A5089792965 @default.
• W2897193657 date "2018-10-30" @default.
• W2897193657 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2897193657 title "Toward a new treatment planning approach accounting for <i>in vivo</i> proton range verification" @default.
• W2897193657 cites W1498436455 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W1965889446 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W1972114195 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W1974672859 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W1999189079 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2007352833 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2015091362 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2022295520 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2023921468 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2032680821 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2034480242 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2049991989 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2050238462 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2057326035 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2057756877 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2059056028 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2065568288 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2077747692 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2080634330 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2104133157 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2119936729 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2128520234 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2133223489 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2137351302 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2144241398 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2175529401 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2600891405 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2610283735 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2744561640 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2755375135 @default.
• W2897193657 cites W2790470968 @default.
• W2897193657 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aae749" @default.
• W2897193657 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30375361" @default.
• W2897193657 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2897193657 type Work @default.
• W2897193657 sameAs 2897193657 @default.
• W2897193657 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2897193657 countsByYear W28971936572019 @default.
• W2897193657 countsByYear W28971936572020 @default.
• W2897193657 countsByYear W28971936572021 @default.
• W2897193657 countsByYear W28971936572023 @default.
• W2897193657 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5000377815 @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5019429498 @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5027114196 @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5032916705 @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5035151357 @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5038323479 @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5053172359 @default.
• W2897193657 hasAuthorship W2897193657A5089792965 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C134949993 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C2775881188 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C2779244869 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C2779843651 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C54516573 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C105795698 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C120665830 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C121332964 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C126838900 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C134949993 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C159985019 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C168834538 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C185544564 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C192562407 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C19499675 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C19527891 @default.
• W2897193657 hasConceptScore W2897193657C199360897 @default.

• next