Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897217547> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2897217547 endingPage "254" @default.
- W2897217547 startingPage "233" @default.
- W2897217547 abstract "Currently, there are inconsistencies in the body of evidence for the effects of resistance and aerobic training on skeletal muscle hypertrophy. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze current evidence on the differences in hypertrophic adaptation to aerobic and resistance training, and to discuss potential reasons for the disparities noted in the literature. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed for this review. The Downs and Black checklist was used for the assessment of methodological quality of the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed. In total, three analyses were performed: (1) for whole-muscle knee extensor data; (2) for type I fiber cross-sectional area; and (3) for type II fiber cross-sectional area. The final number of included studies in the present review is 21. All studies were of good or moderate methodological quality. The meta-analysis for whole-muscle hypertrophy resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) in responses between the aerobic training and resistance training interventions. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance over aerobic training, was 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.41–90; I2 = 0%). The meta-analysis for type I fiber cross-sectional area data resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) between the aerobic training and resistance training groups. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance training over aerobic training, was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.44–1.54; I2 = 24%). The meta-analysis of type II fiber cross-sectional area data resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) between the aerobic training and resistance training groups. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance training over aerobic training, was 1.44 (95% confidence interval 0.93–1.95; I2 = 8%). The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that single-mode aerobic training does not promote the same skeletal muscle hypertrophy as resistance training. This finding was consistent with measurements of muscle hypertrophy both at the whole-muscle and myofiber levels. While these results are specific to the knee extensor musculature, it can be hypothesized that similar results would be seen for other muscle groups as well." @default.
- W2897217547 created "2018-10-26" @default.
- W2897217547 creator A5001186834 @default.
- W2897217547 creator A5006143223 @default.
- W2897217547 creator A5011214179 @default.
- W2897217547 creator A5014463654 @default.
- W2897217547 creator A5035102680 @default.
- W2897217547 creator A5059678310 @default.
- W2897217547 creator A5073206881 @default.
- W2897217547 date "2018-10-20" @default.
- W2897217547 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W2897217547 title "Does Aerobic Training Promote the Same Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy as Resistance Training? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1240635074 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1490005917 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1546125227 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1900048383 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1933285363 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1951514253 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1964076858 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1970591890 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1978684156 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1982415909 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1984475812 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1995086479 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W1995470473 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2001770100 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2001850834 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2003776952 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2005501262 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2013458427 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2016266870 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2029328302 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2031782697 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2031847822 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2033585778 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2033964545 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2042941067 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2060353749 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2069064193 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2076115872 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2081181591 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2083552775 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2093148228 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2097443151 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2097693738 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2098787652 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2101877733 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2109554053 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2114488753 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2120694833 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2133936855 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2137046611 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2148057629 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2153958383 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2171643289 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2196373679 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2246766137 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2339005651 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2396613666 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2572728698 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2620402219 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2737388892 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2755902069 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2756401824 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2765506633 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2767493483 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2776247130 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2788839782 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2792557164 @default.
- W2897217547 cites W2914053210 @default.
- W2897217547 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-1008-z" @default.
- W2897217547 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30341595" @default.
- W2897217547 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2897217547 type Work @default.
- W2897217547 sameAs 2897217547 @default.
- W2897217547 citedByCount "41" @default.
- W2897217547 countsByYear W28972175472019 @default.
- W2897217547 countsByYear W28972175472020 @default.
- W2897217547 countsByYear W28972175472021 @default.
- W2897217547 countsByYear W28972175472022 @default.
- W2897217547 countsByYear W28972175472023 @default.
- W2897217547 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2897217547 hasAuthorship W2897217547A5001186834 @default.
- W2897217547 hasAuthorship W2897217547A5006143223 @default.
- W2897217547 hasAuthorship W2897217547A5011214179 @default.
- W2897217547 hasAuthorship W2897217547A5014463654 @default.
- W2897217547 hasAuthorship W2897217547A5035102680 @default.
- W2897217547 hasAuthorship W2897217547A5059678310 @default.
- W2897217547 hasAuthorship W2897217547A5073206881 @default.
- W2897217547 hasBestOaLocation W28972175472 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C103038586 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C167414201 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C3019424981 @default.
- W2897217547 hasConcept C43893838 @default.