FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897294225> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897294225 endingPage "771" @default.
• W2897294225 startingPage "757" @default.
• W2897294225 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to comparatively examine the personnel working in the clothing sector by examining them in three different methods in order to determine the working postures, identification of the stress factors of musculoskeletal system and the exposures depending on the working postures. Methods used in the study, REBA (Hignett and McAtamney, 2000), Ovako Working Posture Analyzing System (OWAS) (Karhu et al., 1977) and PLIBEL (Kemmlert, 1995) are the scientific observation-based methods. Within the scope of this study, the working stations and the working postures of the operators who work in the clothing sector were examined and their movements that could cause harm to the body were examined and in conclusion some suggestions were suggested to prevent these movements. Design/methodology/approach Due to the standard unit of times in clothing sector are short and the work done is very repetitive, 30 min recording was thought as enough for each operator examined. These recorded videos were then divided into 30 s photographs to obtain the poses of the operators’ working postures. In the scope of the research, first, the PLIBEL observation form was filled as the PLIBEL method is more general one. According to the working postures, the body regions which are damaged or can be damaged were identified and the PLIBEL form was filled in the consideration of the risk factors in the form (Malchaire 2011). In addition, the photographs were also analyzed with REBA and OWAS methods for having more quantitative and detailed results. Findings The working postures of the operators who work in the cutting, sewing, ironing, quality control and packaging departments of six clothing companies were examined in the scope of this research with PLIBEL, REBA and OWAS methods in terms of ergonomy. The results belonging to each department were given separately. REBA and OWAS methods have been applied in order to investigate the working postures in more detail due to the lack of providing numerical data of the PLIBEL method. The reliability of the study has been approved with obtaining the similar results from the REBA and OWAS methods. According to Table VIII, both of the methods show that all the departments in question need ergonomic arrangements. It was analyzed that the cutting department is in the first place which needs ergonomic arrangement immediately (REBA %90.58, OWAS %87.69). Practical implications This study is composed of 65 operators who have experience between 5 and 22 years and in the age range of 22–43 working in the cutting, sewing, ironing, quality control and packaging departments in eight different clothing companies. These 65 operators were recorded by video camera during their work. The recording time were selected randomly. The movements of operators during their own work have been taken into consideration. Originality/value This paper indicates the usability of the PLIBEL, OWAS and REBA methods in clothing sector. Using these methods in clothing sectors states the value and the originality of this paper." @default.
• W2897294225 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897294225 creator A5031343630 @default.
• W2897294225 creator A5049470243 @default.
• W2897294225 creator A5060327518 @default.
• W2897294225 date "2018-10-17" @default.
• W2897294225 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2897294225 title "Ergonomic assessment of working postures in clothing sector with scientific observation methods" @default.
• W2897294225 cites W1998074659 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2005406300 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2008076986 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2016079814 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2024097232 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2047857492 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2050112321 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2061827864 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2071368839 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2097677829 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2403786661 @default.
• W2897294225 cites W2567008588 @default.
• W2897294225 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcst-06-2017-0084" @default.
• W2897294225 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2897294225 type Work @default.
• W2897294225 sameAs 2897294225 @default.
• W2897294225 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2897294225 countsByYear W28972942252018 @default.
• W2897294225 countsByYear W28972942252020 @default.
• W2897294225 countsByYear W28972942252021 @default.
• W2897294225 countsByYear W28972942252022 @default.
• W2897294225 countsByYear W28972942252023 @default.
• W2897294225 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897294225 hasAuthorship W2897294225A5031343630 @default.
• W2897294225 hasAuthorship W2897294225A5049470243 @default.
• W2897294225 hasAuthorship W2897294225A5060327518 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C166735990 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C2777877159 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C2983843516 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C3020240193 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C530175646 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C127413603 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C166735990 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C166957645 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C18762648 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C199360897 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C205649164 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C21547014 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C2777877159 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C2778012447 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C2983843516 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C3017944768 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C3020240193 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C41008148 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C530175646 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C71924100 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C78519656 @default.
• W2897294225 hasConceptScore W2897294225C99454951 @default.
• W2897294225 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2897294225 hasLocation W28972942251 @default.
• W2897294225 hasOpenAccess W2897294225 @default.
• W2897294225 hasPrimaryLocation W28972942251 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2055296412 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2355678371 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2361903339 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2365758206 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2366673854 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2385290369 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2619034010 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2621117993 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2897294225 hasRelatedWork W2993098238 @default.
• W2897294225 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2897294225 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2897294225 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2897294225 magId "2897294225" @default.
• W2897294225 workType "article" @default.