FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897318877> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897318877 abstract "Tumescent and/or conductive anaesthesia is the most frequently performed procedure to anesthetize the thermal types of surgical interventions, mini-phlebectomy and stripping of subcutaneous veins in outpatient settings. These interventions have become a common outpatient procedure almost everywhere, which made the issue of local anaesthesia more sensitive over the past 5 years in Russia. The aim is to compare the efficacy, safety and comfort when injecting various anaesthetic solutions to relieve pain during endovenous laser obliteration/radio frequency catheter ablation, stripping of the subcutaneous veins and mini-phlebectomy. Searching method. We searched for original articles in PubMed, in the archives of «Phlebology» and «Angiology and Vascular Surgery» journals issued for the period between 2001 and November 2018 and the search for official instructions in the state register of medicinal products. Selection criteria. We included all comparative studies: randomized and non-randomized, in which pain was assessed both during injection of a tumescent solution before EVLO and/or mini-phlebectomy and during surgery, as well as systematic reviews and monographs. Data analysis. In total, we identified 9 studies: 7 randomized and 2 non-randomized, one systematic review and two monographs. The advantage of a buffered solution over unbuffered one in terms of reducing pain during injection is revealed in three randomized, one simple comparative study and on the basis of systematic review data. A great efficacy of combining tumescent anaesthesia with a femoral nerve blockade, which was equivalent to spinal anaesthesia, was found in 4 randomized trials, two of which were double-blind, and one non-randomized. In addition, a smaller degree of motor block was reported after blocking the femoral nerve in comparison with spinal anaesthesia. In one randomized trial in which pain was assessed using cold and warm solutions, no significant differences in pain were observed either during or after surgery. In order to prepare a tumescent solution, lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine were used at concentrations ranging from 0.028% to 0.2%; the advantages of higher concentrations over the lower ones have not been revealed. No adverse reactions and complications of anaesthesia have been reported in the studies, except for one where methaemoglobinemia of mild degree was detected in a small number of patients when using 0.2% prilocaine. The conclusion. Local anaesthesia, namely, conductive and tumescent anaesthesia, is an effective and safe anaesthesia method in outpatient surgery. Even very low concentrations of anaesthetic solutions are effective for tumescent anaesthesia. The use of buffered solutions increases significantly patient comfort during the injection. The combination of tumescent anaesthesia and femoral nerve block increases the effectiveness of anaesthesia. The femoral nerve block has significant advantages in comparison with spinal anaesthesia in terms of safety." @default.
• W2897318877 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897318877 creator A5046126768 @default.
• W2897318877 creator A5053145434 @default.
• W2897318877 date "2018-06-20" @default.
• W2897318877 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2897318877 title "Anesthesia in outpatient phlebology practice" @default.
• W2897318877 cites W1995736807 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2041313026 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2089907738 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2110165224 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2318189031 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2395577523 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2429514141 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2497466604 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W2743735712 @default.
• W2897318877 cites W4237469274 @default.
• W2897318877 doi "https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-14772018-1-2-52-56" @default.
• W2897318877 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2897318877 type Work @default.
• W2897318877 sameAs 2897318877 @default.
• W2897318877 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2897318877 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897318877 hasAuthorship W2897318877A5046126768 @default.
• W2897318877 hasAuthorship W2897318877A5053145434 @default.
• W2897318877 hasBestOaLocation W28973188771 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConcept C2776983577 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConceptScore W2897318877C141071460 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConceptScore W2897318877C168563851 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConceptScore W2897318877C2776983577 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConceptScore W2897318877C42219234 @default.
• W2897318877 hasConceptScore W2897318877C71924100 @default.
• W2897318877 hasLocation W28973188771 @default.
• W2897318877 hasLocation W28973188772 @default.
• W2897318877 hasOpenAccess W2897318877 @default.
• W2897318877 hasPrimaryLocation W28973188771 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W2897318877 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2897318877 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2897318877 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2897318877 magId "2897318877" @default.
• W2897318877 workType "article" @default.