FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897341556> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897341556 abstract "Clinical trials of biomedical HIV prevention modalities require the cooperation of multiple stakeholders. Key stakeholders, such as community members, may have stark vulnerabilities. Consequently, calls for HIV prevention researchers to implement stakeholder engagement are increasingly common. Such engagement is held to benefit inter-stakeholder relations, stakeholders themselves and the research itself. The ethics review process presents a unique opportunity to strengthen stakeholder engagement practices in HIV prevention trials. However, this is not necessarily straightforward. In this article, we consider several complexities. First, is stakeholder engagement a legitimate component of what Research Ethics Committees (RECs) should review for HIV prevention trials? Second, what are the core features of engagement that should be under ethics review? Third, what are the key practices that should be highlighted in ethics review?To address these questions, we examined the international ethics guidelines specialized for such trials (UNAIDS 2012, UNAIDS-AVAC GPP 2011) and directly applicable to such trials (CIOMS 2016; WHO 2011). Thematic analysis was used to code and analyse these guidelines.Ethics guidelines support REC review of engagement. Guidance recommends that engagement be broad and inclusive; early and sustained; and dynamic and responsive. Broad engagement practices include evaluating the context, planning in writing, and resourcing. RECs should assess engagement as part of a comprehensive review, and recommend revisions where necessary. Researchers should profile key elements of engagement valued in ethics guidance, when they draft ethics submissions. Importantly, the ethics review process should not undermine the 'dynamic responsiveness' required for excellent engagement in this field.As evidence-informed engagement strategies emerge, these should inform the ethics submission and review process. Both parties in the review process should strive to avoid a superficial, check-list type approach that caricatures what should be a thorough, nuanced ethics review of a rich, responsive engagement process." @default.
• W2897341556 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897341556 creator A5023370062 @default.
• W2897341556 creator A5036390203 @default.
• W2897341556 creator A5066184160 @default.
• W2897341556 creator A5073284346 @default.
• W2897341556 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2897341556 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2897341556 title "Strengthening stakeholder engagement through ethics review in biomedical HIV prevention trials: opportunities and complexities" @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1491596825 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1589576964 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1969892659 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1977924015 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1982356586 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1985941339 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1986316914 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W1988091012 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2011176827 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2052022873 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2061514304 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2063906153 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2091378032 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2094642875 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2095891392 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2097284181 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2107633932 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2108883470 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2112959200 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2130064529 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2142939128 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2145860358 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2147831648 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2156812612 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2165845288 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2309544443 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2399939610 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2407379334 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2480078621 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2516946670 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2547330277 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2577655093 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2771862236 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2804054047 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W2897341556 @default.
• W2897341556 cites W51016378 @default.
• W2897341556 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25172" @default.
• W2897341556 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6193317" @default.
• W2897341556 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30334604" @default.
• W2897341556 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2897341556 type Work @default.
• W2897341556 sameAs 2897341556 @default.
• W2897341556 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2897341556 countsByYear W28973415562018 @default.
• W2897341556 countsByYear W28973415562019 @default.
• W2897341556 countsByYear W28973415562020 @default.
• W2897341556 countsByYear W28973415562021 @default.
• W2897341556 countsByYear W28973415562022 @default.
• W2897341556 countsByYear W28973415562023 @default.
• W2897341556 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897341556 hasAuthorship W2897341556A5023370062 @default.
• W2897341556 hasAuthorship W2897341556A5036390203 @default.
• W2897341556 hasAuthorship W2897341556A5066184160 @default.
• W2897341556 hasAuthorship W2897341556A5073284346 @default.
• W2897341556 hasBestOaLocation W28973415561 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C153997805 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C205112559 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C2776193868 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C2780984029 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C118552586 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C127413603 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C151730666 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C153997805 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C17744445 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C201305675 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C205112559 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C2776193868 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C2779343474 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C2780984029 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C39549134 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C55587333 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C71924100 @default.
• W2897341556 hasConceptScore W2897341556C86803240 @default.
• W2897341556 hasIssue "S7" @default.
• W2897341556 hasLocation W28973415561 @default.
• W2897341556 hasLocation W28973415562 @default.
• W2897341556 hasLocation W28973415563 @default.
• W2897341556 hasLocation W28973415564 @default.
• W2897341556 hasOpenAccess W2897341556 @default.
• W2897341556 hasPrimaryLocation W28973415561 @default.
• W2897341556 hasRelatedWork W2032180456 @default.

• next