FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897556870> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897556870 endingPage "403" @default.
• W2897556870 startingPage "399" @default.
• W2897556870 abstract "Agreement of triage decisions between gastroenterologists and nurses in a hospital endoscopy unit Stephen Inns,1,2 Jeffrey Wong,1 Dena McPhedran,1 Gladys De Guzman,1 Katherine Broome,1 Dalice Sim,2 Rosemarie Sandford1,† 1Hutt Valley DHB Endoscopy Unit, Hutt Valley DHB, Lower Hutt, Wellington, New Zealand; 2Department of Medicine, Otago University, Wellington School of Medicine, Wellington, New Zealand †Mrs Rosemarie Sandford passed away on December 1, 2015 Introduction: Efficient and accurate triage of endoscopy referrals is essential. Many of the decisions made are based on national and local triage criteria. Standardizing this approach for nurse use could maintain quality, address clinical risk and significantly improve resource utilization.Aims: This study aimed to compare gastroenterologist and nurse triage of unselected gastroenterology referrals in order to evaluate the proportion of referrals felt able to be triaged to endoscopy and the inter-rater agreement between a triage gastroenterologist and endoscopy nurses for clinical triage decisions regarding the urgency of gastroscopy and colonoscopy.Methods: The proportion of referrals triaged to endoscopy by a consultant gastroenterologist performing triage as a part of normal practice and two endoscopy nurses using a decision algorithm was measured. The inter-rater agreement for the triage category decision (urgency of referral) between the three triage clinicians was assessed. An adjudication panel provided a consensus decision triage category decision in cases where there was not complete agreement between the three triage clinicians.Results: Each clinician assessed 105 referrals. Nurse A was able to triage 54 (51%) referrals to a triage category and Nurse B 44 (42%) referrals. Cohen’s κ was run to determine if there was agreement between clinicians for the triage categories allocated. The agreement between the two nurses was substantial (k=0.645, P<0.0005). Between the gastroenterologist and each nurse, moderate agreement was seen (Nurse A, k=0.589, P<0.0005; Nurse B, k=0.437, P<0.0005). Moderate agreement was seen between the nurses and an adjudication panel (Nurse A, k=0.423, P<0.0005; Nurse B, k=0.464, P<0.0005). However, there was only slight agreement between the adjudication panel and the gastroenterologist (k=0.099, P=0.010).Conclusion: Nurse triage using a decision algorithm is feasible, and inter-rater agreement is substantial between nurses and moderate to substantial between the nurses and a gastroenterologist. An adjudication panel demonstrated moderate agreement with the nurses but only slight agreement with the triage gastroenterologist. This suggests that nurse triage using a decision algorithm can approximate decision making by an experienced gastroenterologist. Keywords: comparative study, endoscopy, nurses, referral and consultation, triage" @default.
• W2897556870 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897556870 creator A5004845955 @default.
• W2897556870 creator A5005453803 @default.
• W2897556870 creator A5028112571 @default.
• W2897556870 creator A5033507395 @default.
• W2897556870 creator A5037419169 @default.
• W2897556870 creator A5039774328 @default.
• W2897556870 creator A5043213088 @default.
• W2897556870 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2897556870 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2897556870 title "Agreement of triage decisions between gastroenterologists and nurses in a hospital endoscopy unit" @default.
• W2897556870 cites W1558114867 @default.
• W2897556870 cites W1615787060 @default.
• W2897556870 cites W1993047208 @default.
• W2897556870 cites W2052464337 @default.
• W2897556870 cites W2093625186 @default.
• W2897556870 cites W2148769961 @default.
• W2897556870 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2897556870 cites W2334500160 @default.
• W2897556870 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/ceg.s159516" @default.
• W2897556870 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6199221" @default.
• W2897556870 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30410381" @default.
• W2897556870 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2897556870 type Work @default.
• W2897556870 sameAs 2897556870 @default.
• W2897556870 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2897556870 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897556870 hasAuthorship W2897556870A5004845955 @default.
• W2897556870 hasAuthorship W2897556870A5005453803 @default.
• W2897556870 hasAuthorship W2897556870A5028112571 @default.
• W2897556870 hasAuthorship W2897556870A5033507395 @default.
• W2897556870 hasAuthorship W2897556870A5037419169 @default.
• W2897556870 hasAuthorship W2897556870A5039774328 @default.
• W2897556870 hasAuthorship W2897556870A5043213088 @default.
• W2897556870 hasBestOaLocation W28975568701 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C2777120189 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C121608353 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C126322002 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C126838900 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C159110408 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C194828623 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C2776135927 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C2777120189 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C2778435480 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C2778451229 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C526805850 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C545542383 @default.
• W2897556870 hasConceptScore W2897556870C71924100 @default.
• W2897556870 hasLocation W28975568701 @default.
• W2897556870 hasLocation W28975568702 @default.
• W2897556870 hasLocation W28975568703 @default.
• W2897556870 hasLocation W28975568704 @default.
• W2897556870 hasOpenAccess W2897556870 @default.
• W2897556870 hasPrimaryLocation W28975568701 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W1978689281 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W2042489430 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W2054558632 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W2150245501 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W2315791417 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W2607945686 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W2972408932 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W3045886828 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W3120513507 @default.
• W2897556870 hasRelatedWork W4229067293 @default.
• W2897556870 hasVolume "Volume 11" @default.
• W2897556870 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2897556870 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2897556870 magId "2897556870" @default.
• W2897556870 workType "article" @default.