FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897658996> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897658996 abstract "The design methodology for pipeline systems conveying thickened and paste tailings systems has been well developed over the last decade. This series of papers outlines the process for designing and implementing a typical surface tailings or underground backfill pipeline system. The papers comprise the following parts: Part 1 (this paper) discusses: o development of the design criteria document, o issues to be considered for the test work, and o pipeline flow behaviour modelling, friction loss calculation and pipe diameter selection. Part 2, to be presented at Paste and Thickened Tailings 2007, will include: o centrifugal pump performance derating, o hydraulic and mechanical design, o operational and control considerations, ando specific considerations for thickener underflow and gravity flow systems. 1.1 Terminology Our company classifies tailings and backfills according to the following criteria: The upper limit for conventional tailings is considered to correspond to the freely settled packing concentration. This typically corresponds to yield stresses of between 5 and 20 Pa. High concentration tailings or thickened tailings is considered to cover the range from the freely settled concentration to the concentration at which the mixture has a fully sheared yield stress corresponding to 100 Pa. Figure 1 illustrates the slump of a mixture with a 100 Pa yield stress. Paste tailings and fill are considered to be mixtures with yield stresses greater than 100 Pa. The practical upper limit for pipeline transport is about 800 Pa. These mixtures may be transported in turbulent or laminar flow: Paste2006–R.J.Jewell,S.Lawson,P.Newman(eds)©2006AustralianCentreforGeomechanics,Perth,ISBN0-9756756-5-6Paste2006,Limerick,Ireland 371Turbulent flow – inertial forces dominate and the friction losses are relatively insensitive to the tailings rheology. Laminar flow – viscous forces dominate and the friction losses are directly related to the tailings rheology, which in turn is strongly effected by the tailings material properties, water chemistry and solids concentration. The transition zone from laminar flow occurs over a range of pipeline flow rates and is characterised by fluctuating pressure gradients. Thickened tailings are typically transported in laminar flow, but turbulent flow operation is possible for low yield stress mixtures, large diameter pipes and high operating velocities. Paste tailings are always transported in laminar flow. Iron ore tailings64%m, 100 Pa yield stressFigure 1 Slump at transition from high concentration tailings to paste 1.2 Design process The procedure outlined in this paper is a guideline defining the typical steps to be followed when designing a pipeline system transporting thickened tailings or paste. It is not a definitive procedure that can be followed without a suitable background in the field and a proper understanding of thickened and paste tailings flow behaviour.It is also important to note that the design process is iterative in nature. So while the steps have been laid out in an ideal linear path, the reality is that the process will be more chaotic with frequent jumps between the various steps of the process." @default.
• W2897658996 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897658996 creator A5065806499 @default.
• W2897658996 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2897658996 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2897658996 title "Thickened and Paste Tailings Pipeline Systems: Design Procedure – Part 1" @default.
• W2897658996 cites W2014157839 @default.
• W2897658996 cites W2043430928 @default.
• W2897658996 cites W2058885628 @default.
• W2897658996 cites W2082962167 @default.
• W2897658996 cites W2166701803 @default.
• W2897658996 doi "https://doi.org/10.36487/acg_repo/663_32" @default.
• W2897658996 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2897658996 type Work @default.
• W2897658996 sameAs 2897658996 @default.
• W2897658996 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2897658996 countsByYear W28976589962012 @default.
• W2897658996 countsByYear W28976589962015 @default.
• W2897658996 countsByYear W28976589962017 @default.
• W2897658996 countsByYear W28976589962022 @default.
• W2897658996 countsByYear W28976589962023 @default.
• W2897658996 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2897658996 hasAuthorship W2897658996A5065806499 @default.
• W2897658996 hasBestOaLocation W28976589961 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConcept C43521106 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConcept C5166401 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConceptScore W2897658996C191897082 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConceptScore W2897658996C192562407 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConceptScore W2897658996C199360897 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConceptScore W2897658996C41008148 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConceptScore W2897658996C43521106 @default.
• W2897658996 hasConceptScore W2897658996C5166401 @default.
• W2897658996 hasLocation W28976589961 @default.
• W2897658996 hasOpenAccess W2897658996 @default.
• W2897658996 hasPrimaryLocation W28976589961 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W1506576323 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W2039534605 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W2360883279 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W2560284304 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W2981087920 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W2992516105 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W3081509258 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W3120899676 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W3186188717 @default.
• W2897658996 hasRelatedWork W3210635025 @default.
• W2897658996 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2897658996 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2897658996 magId "2897658996" @default.
• W2897658996 workType "article" @default.