Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897787797> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2897787797 abstract "Objective To better understand the potential of a needs assessment approach using qualitative data from manikin-based and virtual patient simulation debriefing sessions compared with traditional data collection methods (ie, focus groups and interviews). Design Original data from simulation debrief sessions was compared and contrasted with data from an earlier assessment of critical care needs in a community setting (using focus groups and interviews), thus undertaking secondary analysis of data. Time and cost data were also examined. Debrief sessions were coded using deductive and inductive techniques. Matrices were used to explore the commonalities, differences and emergent findings across the methods. Setting Critical care unit in a community hospital setting. Results Interviews and focus groups yielded 684 and 647 min of audio-recordings, respectively. The manikin-based debrief recordings averaged 22 min (total=130 min) and virtual patient debrief recordings averaged 31 min (total=186 min). The approximate cost for the interviews and focus groups was $13 560, for manikin-based simulation debriefs was $4030 and for the virtual patient debriefs was $3475. Fifteen of 20 total themes were common across the simulation debriefs and interview/focus group data. Simulation-specific themes were identified, including fidelity (environment, equipment and psychological) and the multiple roles of the simulation instructor (educative, promoting reflection and assessing needs). Conclusions Given current fiscal realities, the dual benefit of being educative and identifying needs is appealing. While simulation is an innovative method to conduct needs assessments, it is important to recognise that there are trade-offs with the selection of methods." @default.
- W2897787797 created "2018-10-26" @default.
- W2897787797 creator A5000204809 @default.
- W2897787797 creator A5028075537 @default.
- W2897787797 creator A5048005267 @default.
- W2897787797 creator A5048792901 @default.
- W2897787797 creator A5051466873 @default.
- W2897787797 creator A5070798517 @default.
- W2897787797 date "2018-10-01" @default.
- W2897787797 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2897787797 title "Comparison of simulation debriefs with traditional needs assessment methods: a qualitative exploratory study in a critical care community setting" @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1544133109 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1598011883 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1728498948 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1970134675 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1972545193 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1972770320 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1976546365 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1993181943 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W1993449939 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2003430368 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2012016729 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2020083361 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2020138070 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2036488299 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2042730361 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2047526441 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2054000298 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2072210724 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2072401914 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2073011977 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2073877894 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2087814979 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2097762032 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2101252874 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2135062883 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2139051018 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2142386716 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2152804931 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2153694812 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2162661914 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2170202608 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W2322141813 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W4214943720 @default.
- W2897787797 cites W4256201403 @default.
- W2897787797 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020570" @default.
- W2897787797 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6194405" @default.
- W2897787797 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30297343" @default.
- W2897787797 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2897787797 type Work @default.
- W2897787797 sameAs 2897787797 @default.
- W2897787797 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2897787797 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2897787797 hasAuthorship W2897787797A5000204809 @default.
- W2897787797 hasAuthorship W2897787797A5028075537 @default.
- W2897787797 hasAuthorship W2897787797A5048005267 @default.
- W2897787797 hasAuthorship W2897787797A5048792901 @default.
- W2897787797 hasAuthorship W2897787797A5051466873 @default.
- W2897787797 hasAuthorship W2897787797A5070798517 @default.
- W2897787797 hasBestOaLocation W28977877971 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C202695956 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C28718268 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConcept C87156501 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C105795698 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C119857082 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C133462117 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C144024400 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C144133560 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C15744967 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C159110408 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C162853370 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C190248442 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C19165224 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C202695956 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C28718268 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C33923547 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C36289849 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C41008148 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C509550671 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C56995899 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C71924100 @default.
- W2897787797 hasConceptScore W2897787797C75630572 @default.