FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897816217> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897816217 endingPage "50" @default.
• W2897816217 startingPage "26" @default.
• W2897816217 abstract "Purpose This paper aims to investigate the Chinese employment relationship under the framework of psychological contracts. The authors explored the effects of firm ownership (in terms of state-owned and private enterprises) and employment type (in terms of permanent and temporary employees) on employee perceptions of psychological contract. In addition, the associations between fulfilled psychological contract and various dimensions of employee attitudes were examined. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopted a questionnaire as the primary instrument to investigate the impact of firm ownership and employment type on psychological contract perceptions and outcomes. The analysis was based on a Chinese sample of a size of 363 employees. Findings The results indicate that state-owned employees overall reported fewer promises (employer under-obligation promised psychological contract), while private employees tended to have more promises (mutual high obligation, employer over-obligation and quasi-spot obligation promise-based psychological contract). Permanent employees reported high fulfillment (employer over-obligation, mutual high obligation and employer under-obligation fulfilled psychological contract). In contrast, temporary employees presented many promises (mutual high obligation promised psychological contract) and low fulfillment (quasi-spot fulfilled psychological contract). In general, firm ownership had weak effects on permanent and temporary employees’ perceptions of promise-based psychological contract, but no significant influence on fulfillment-based psychological contract. Moreover, psychological contract fulfillment was positively related to employees’ fairness perception and job satisfaction, while negatively related to the intention to quit. The authors failed to find comprehensive statistical support for the moderating effects of firm ownership or employment type. Originality/value The study contributes to the literature through a number of ways. First, instead of psychological contract breach, the authors use psychological contract fulfillment as a direct measure to examine the relationship between psychological contract and employees’ attitudes. Second, they investigate the effects of firm ownership on employment relationship under the psychological contract framework, enriching the institutional lens of the issue. Third, while majority of psychological contract studies concerning employment type concentrate on either permanent or temporary employees, the authors take both types into account. Fourth, they integrate perspectives of firm ownership and employment type. Finally, the authors perform the study in the Chinese context, which offers extra evidence to the body of psychological contract literature." @default.
• W2897816217 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897816217 creator A5024778093 @default.
• W2897816217 creator A5038558377 @default.
• W2897816217 creator A5079338842 @default.
• W2897816217 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2897816217 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2897816217 title "Psychological contract and employee attitudes" @default.
• W2897816217 cites W1540753192 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W18174121 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W1969673763 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W1972176093 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2002509673 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2003829874 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2006621241 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2007662513 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2036503449 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2044260025 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2060627807 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2066503845 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2066762488 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2072987665 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2075020353 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2080544736 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2107146680 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2122456148 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2125974543 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2128979360 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2135265923 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2145714078 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2150302031 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2150721786 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2158115895 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2171436884 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W2332937139 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W4211150306 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W4245794258 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W4253727008 @default.
• W2897816217 cites W4292811746 @default.
• W2897816217 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-06-2017-0171" @default.
• W2897816217 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2897816217 type Work @default.
• W2897816217 sameAs 2897816217 @default.
• W2897816217 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2897816217 countsByYear W28978162172020 @default.
• W2897816217 countsByYear W28978162172022 @default.
• W2897816217 countsByYear W28978162172023 @default.
• W2897816217 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897816217 hasAuthorship W2897816217A5024778093 @default.
• W2897816217 hasAuthorship W2897816217A5038558377 @default.
• W2897816217 hasAuthorship W2897816217A5079338842 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C11012388 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C145236788 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C17163166 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C2776325488 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C2776950860 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C2778447849 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C11012388 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C127413603 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C144133560 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C145236788 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C15744967 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C162324750 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C169760540 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C17163166 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C17744445 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C18762648 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C199539241 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C26760741 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C2776325488 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C2776950860 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C2778447849 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C77805123 @default.
• W2897816217 hasConceptScore W2897816217C78519656 @default.
• W2897816217 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2897816217 hasLocation W28978162171 @default.
• W2897816217 hasOpenAccess W2897816217 @default.
• W2897816217 hasPrimaryLocation W28978162171 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W1975430480 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W2047015521 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W2058343334 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W2066141621 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W2314741747 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W2737019285 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W2897816217 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W4226245675 @default.
• W2897816217 hasRelatedWork W4238816758 @default.

• next