FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897861439> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897861439 endingPage "1248" @default.
• W2897861439 startingPage "1240" @default.
• W2897861439 abstract "Context Resources for medical education are becoming more constrained, whereas accountability in medical education is increasing. In this constrictive environment, medical schools need to consider and justify their selection procedures in terms of costs and benefits. To date, there have been no studies focusing on this aspect of selection. Objectives We aimed to examine and compare the costs and benefits of two different approaches to admission into medical school: a tailored, multimethod selection process versus a lottery procedure. Our goal was to assess the relative effectiveness of each approach and to compare these in terms of benefits and costs from the perspective of the medical school. Methods The study was conducted at Maastricht University Medical School, at which the selection process and a weighted lottery procedure ran in parallel for 3 years (2011–2013). The costs and benefits of the selection process were compared with those of the lottery procedure over three student cohorts throughout the Bachelor's programme. The extra costs of selection represented the monetary investment of the medical school in conducting the selection procedure; the benefits were derived from the increase in income generated by the prevention of dropout and the reductions in extra costs facilitated by decreases in the repetition of blocks and objective structured clinical examinations. Results The tailor‐made selection procedure cost about €139 000 when extrapolated to a full cohort of students ( n = 286). The lottery procedure came with negligible costs for the medical school. However, the average benefits of selection compared with the lottery system added up to almost €207 000. Conclusions This study not only shows that conducting a cost–benefit comparison is feasible in the context of selection for medical school, but also that an ‘expensive’ selection process can be cost‐beneficial in comparison with an ‘inexpensive’ lottery system. We encourage other medical schools to examine the cost‐effectiveness of their own selection processes in relation to student outcomes in order to extend knowledge on this important topic." @default.
• W2897861439 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897861439 creator A5000830448 @default.
• W2897861439 creator A5046965563 @default.
• W2897861439 creator A5048568770 @default.
• W2897861439 creator A5069024507 @default.
• W2897861439 creator A5081091039 @default.
• W2897861439 date "2018-10-15" @default.
• W2897861439 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2897861439 title "Does selection pay off? A cost-benefit comparison of medical school selection and lottery systems" @default.
• W2897861439 cites W1999444165 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2024570898 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2038227228 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2070268068 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2090525083 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2128911553 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2143025931 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2202731635 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2278064451 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2406121360 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2553958003 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2587055915 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2598892095 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2602354548 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2603541397 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2762508653 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2772388712 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2789703719 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2890428933 @default.
• W2897861439 cites W2917313967 @default.
• W2897861439 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13698" @default.
• W2897861439 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6282742" @default.
• W2897861439 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30324680" @default.
• W2897861439 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2897861439 type Work @default.
• W2897861439 sameAs 2897861439 @default.
• W2897861439 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2897861439 countsByYear W28978614392018 @default.
• W2897861439 countsByYear W28978614392019 @default.
• W2897861439 countsByYear W28978614392020 @default.
• W2897861439 countsByYear W28978614392022 @default.
• W2897861439 countsByYear W28978614392023 @default.
• W2897861439 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897861439 hasAuthorship W2897861439A5000830448 @default.
• W2897861439 hasAuthorship W2897861439A5046965563 @default.
• W2897861439 hasAuthorship W2897861439A5048568770 @default.
• W2897861439 hasAuthorship W2897861439A5069024507 @default.
• W2897861439 hasAuthorship W2897861439A5081091039 @default.
• W2897861439 hasBestOaLocation W28978614391 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C2777340749 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C144133560 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C151730666 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C154945302 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C162118730 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C162324750 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C175444787 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C17744445 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C199539241 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C2776007630 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C2777340749 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C2779343474 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C41008148 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C509550671 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C71924100 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C81917197 @default.
• W2897861439 hasConceptScore W2897861439C86803240 @default.
• W2897861439 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2897861439 hasLocation W28978614391 @default.
• W2897861439 hasLocation W28978614392 @default.
• W2897861439 hasLocation W28978614393 @default.
• W2897861439 hasLocation W28978614394 @default.
• W2897861439 hasLocation W28978614395 @default.
• W2897861439 hasOpenAccess W2897861439 @default.
• W2897861439 hasPrimaryLocation W28978614391 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W2152576289 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W2582884230 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W2902609936 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W2949758729 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W3021960738 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W3150535451 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W4321649500 @default.
• W2897861439 hasRelatedWork W4380367290 @default.

• next