FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897865811> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897865811 abstract "Conducting systematic reviews is time-consuming but crucial to construct evidence-based patient decision aids, clinical practice guidelines and decision analyses. New methods might enable developers to produce a knowledge base more rapidly. However, trading off scientific rigour for speed when creating a knowledge base is controversial, and the consequences are insufficiently known. We developed and applied faster methods including systematic reviews and network meta-analyses, assessed their feasibility and compared them to a gold standard approach. We also assessed the feasibility of using decision analysis to perform this comparison. Long-term treatment in bipolar disorder was our testing field. We developed two new methods: an empirically based, rapid network meta-analysis (NMA) and an expert NMA, and conducted a patient survey. We applied these methods to collect effect estimates for evidence-based treatments on outcomes important to patients. The relative importance of outcomes was obtained from patients using a stated preference method. We used multi-criteria decision analysis to compare a gold standard NMA with the rapid NMA in terms of the ability of the gold standard NMA to change the ranking and expected values of treatments for individual patients. Using rapid methods, it was feasible to identify evidence addressing outcomes important to patients. We found that replacing effect estimates from our rapid NMA with estimates from the gold standard NMA resulted in relatively small changes in the ranking and expected value of treatments. The rapid method sufficed to estimate the effects of nine out of ten options. To produce a ranking of treatments accurate for more than 95% of patients, it was necessary to supplement systematic with rapid methods and to use relative importance weights in the analysis. Integrating estimates of the outcome “treatment burden” had a larger impact on rankings than replacing rapid with gold standard methods. Using patients’ importance weights only modestly affected results. The transfer of knowledge to practice could benefit from faster systematic reviewing methods. The results in this preliminary assessment suggest that an improved rapid NMA approach might replace gold standard NMAs. Decision analysis could be used to compare evidence summarisation methods." @default.
• W2897865811 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897865811 creator A5008474739 @default.
• W2897865811 creator A5019350720 @default.
• W2897865811 creator A5028452551 @default.
• W2897865811 creator A5051347702 @default.
• W2897865811 date "2018-10-20" @default.
• W2897865811 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2897865811 title "Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis" @default.
• W2897865811 cites W1931843264 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W1969114959 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W1970872931 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W1984344128 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W1984615306 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W1988493763 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W1998902846 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2012476442 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2024737544 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2030654240 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2032929520 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2041927436 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2050669734 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2073644162 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2081398893 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2092255211 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2103862981 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2109051507 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2122423682 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2146668368 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2148636952 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2152615475 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2156100542 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2157543003 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2158796716 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2159121089 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2167563796 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2169449290 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2192101384 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2239810687 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2294402265 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2326546984 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2413147341 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W243487136 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W246286872 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2560715482 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2593758073 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2594542365 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W2735733556 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W3142527019 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W2897865811 cites W94847606 @default.
• W2897865811 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0829-z" @default.
• W2897865811 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6195718" @default.
• W2897865811 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30342549" @default.
• W2897865811 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2897865811 type Work @default.
• W2897865811 sameAs 2897865811 @default.
• W2897865811 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2897865811 countsByYear W28978658112020 @default.
• W2897865811 countsByYear W28978658112021 @default.
• W2897865811 countsByYear W28978658112022 @default.
• W2897865811 countsByYear W28978658112023 @default.
• W2897865811 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897865811 hasAuthorship W2897865811A5008474739 @default.
• W2897865811 hasAuthorship W2897865811A5019350720 @default.
• W2897865811 hasAuthorship W2897865811A5028452551 @default.
• W2897865811 hasAuthorship W2897865811A5051347702 @default.
• W2897865811 hasBestOaLocation W28978658111 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C186116695 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C2780033181 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C2780801425 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C71008984 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C105795698 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C119857082 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C126322002 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C142724271 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C17744445 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C186116695 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C189430467 @default.
• W2897865811 hasConceptScore W2897865811C189708586 @default.

• next