FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2897980574> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2897980574 endingPage "608" @default.
• W2897980574 startingPage "601" @default.
• W2897980574 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A prospective, randomized multicenter IDE trial between May 2002 and October 2004. Objective. The aim of this study was to report on the 10-year safety and efficacy of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). Summary of Background Data. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a potential alternative for anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with the hope that maintenance of motion may decrease the likelihood of adjacent segment disease. Methods. This is an analysis of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigation comparing CDA with ACDF for single-level patients. Eligible patients were ≥ 21 years of age with symptomatic cervical disc disease who had failed conservative care. Patients were followed at regular intervals with the current data set at > 10 years. Protocol for overall success: ≥ 15-point improvement in NDI scores, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status, no serious adverse events related to implant or implant/surgical procedure, and no subsequent surgery or intervention classified as “failure.” Results. At 10-year follow-up, 128 (CDA) and 104 (ACDF) patients were available for evaluation. Overall success rate was significantly higher for CDA group (81.3% vs. 66.3%; P = 0.005). The rate of second surgeries at adjacent levels was lower for CDA group (9.7% vs. 15.8%; P = 0.146). NDI scores improved significantly in CDA group (Δ38.3 vs. Δ31.1; P = 0.010). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm improved in the CDA group (Δ54.3 vs. Δ49.2; P = 0.119), (Δ58.1 vs. Δ51.6; P = 0.0.60) respectively. About 4.1% of CDA patients and 4.9% of ACDF patients had serious adverse events related to study device. Mean angular motions at index level for BRYAN disc and ACDF were 8.69° and 0.60°, respectively. Conclusion. CDA can preserve and maintain motion in the long term compared with ACDF. There was a trend toward fewer adjacent segment surgeries for BRYAN disc that did not reach significance. Significant improvement in CDA NDI scores may suggest better long-term success for CDA as compared to fusion. Level of Evidence: 2 BRYAN disc arthroplasty has been studied for safety and efficacy with over 10 year data and compared with ACDF. BRYAN disc have advantage over cervical fusion for preserving cervical motion. NDI scores improved and adjacent segment surgeries reduced with BRYAN disc compared to cervical fusion." @default.
• W2897980574 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2897980574 creator A5021601018 @default.
• W2897980574 creator A5058043578 @default.
• W2897980574 creator A5062744165 @default.
• W2897980574 creator A5068740432 @default.
• W2897980574 date "2019-05-01" @default.
• W2897980574 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2897980574 title "Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement With the BRYAN Cervical Disc" @default.
• W2897980574 cites W1488157144 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W1556563629 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W1895111093 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W1965786757 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W1966155705 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W1973455742 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W1996022106 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2015748473 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2016808146 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2028269517 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2029221685 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2030038103 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2046669842 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2047460075 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2054508227 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2056404892 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2058178697 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2059977682 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2066665758 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2077481395 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2084745043 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2155539779 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2261711001 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2334801128 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2441551643 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2499955699 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2538019449 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2570168836 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W2570375417 @default.
• W2897980574 cites W4248383153 @default.
• W2897980574 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002907" @default.
• W2897980574 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30325888" @default.
• W2897980574 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2897980574 type Work @default.
• W2897980574 sameAs 2897980574 @default.
• W2897980574 citedByCount "85" @default.
• W2897980574 countsByYear W28979805742019 @default.
• W2897980574 countsByYear W28979805742020 @default.
• W2897980574 countsByYear W28979805742021 @default.
• W2897980574 countsByYear W28979805742022 @default.
• W2897980574 countsByYear W28979805742023 @default.
• W2897980574 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2897980574 hasAuthorship W2897980574A5021601018 @default.
• W2897980574 hasAuthorship W2897980574A5058043578 @default.
• W2897980574 hasAuthorship W2897980574A5062744165 @default.
• W2897980574 hasAuthorship W2897980574A5068740432 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2776944266 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2778051963 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2778614594 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2778620186 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2781430139 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C126322002 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C141071460 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C14184104 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C168563851 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C197934379 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2776944266 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2778051963 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2778336525 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2778614594 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2778620186 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2781411149 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2781430139 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C2985379065 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C44575665 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C535046627 @default.
• W2897980574 hasConceptScore W2897980574C71924100 @default.
• W2897980574 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2897980574 hasLocation W28979805741 @default.
• W2897980574 hasOpenAccess W2897980574 @default.
• W2897980574 hasPrimaryLocation W28979805741 @default.
• W2897980574 hasRelatedWork W1996022106 @default.
• W2897980574 hasRelatedWork W2036887551 @default.
• W2897980574 hasRelatedWork W2088725399 @default.
• W2897980574 hasRelatedWork W2101545850 @default.
• W2897980574 hasRelatedWork W2317376856 @default.
• W2897980574 hasRelatedWork W2339239953 @default.
• W2897980574 hasRelatedWork W2384202814 @default.

• next