FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2898053889> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2898053889 endingPage "160" @default.
• W2898053889 startingPage "153" @default.
• W2898053889 abstract "Introduction Endovascular intervention involving the aortic arch, particularly in thoracic aortic dissection, remains challenging and controversial at current time when there is no commercially suitable grafts on most of the international markets. This study compared two endovascular treatments that maintain left subclavian artery perfusion using two modified techniques for type-B aortic dissection patients. Methods Consecutive cases utilizing chimney or in situ fenestration techniques to preserve left subclavian artery in type B AD from 2006 to 2015 in our single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed with Student t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher exact tests when appropriate. Significant statistical differences were determined with p < 0.05. Results A total of 85 cases, including 67 (79.8%) with chimney and 18 (21.2%) with in situ fenestration techniques were identified in this retrospective study. In chimney group, there were 18 (26.9%) acute, 29 (43.3%) sub-acute, and 20 (29.9%) chronic aortic dissections. We implanted 24 Zenith and 43 Talent aortic endografts along with 55 balloon-expandable bare stents and 12 self-expanding covered stents in chimney group. Whereas in in situ fenestration group, there were four (22.2%) acute, six (33.3%) subacute, and eight (44.5%) chronic aortic dissections, all of which received Zenith endografts with 11 balloon-expandable covered and seven self-expanding covered stents, respectively. Demographic variables were similarly distributed with 100% intraoperative technical overall success in both groups. Comparing to in situ fenestration group, chimney group has shorter procedural and fluoroscopy time, less blood loss, and contrast volume used. All patients were followed-up to 52 months (median 38, range 24–52). Overall group mortality is 3.6% (3/84). All deaths were from chimney group. There was no procedure-related stroke observed within the study series. Primary patency was maintained while aortic remodeling with complete false lumen was achieved in all patients except that there were three (4.55%) Type-I endoleak cases in early post-operative period and one (1.5%) stent compression at 3-months follow-up in chimney group. There were no stent-related complications observed in in situ fenestration group. Conclusion Although there were previous studies describing the similar techniques, this study appears to be the first study to compare in situ fenestration and chimney techniques for aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery according to the MEDLINE search. Although we are unable to establish the superiority between two approaches due to small sample size and relative short period of follow-up, in situ fenestration may represent a more favorable option, especially among aortic dissections with short proximal landing zones in the study." @default.
• W2898053889 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2898053889 creator A5004231602 @default.
• W2898053889 creator A5036085392 @default.
• W2898053889 creator A5049396596 @default.
• W2898053889 creator A5060757292 @default.
• W2898053889 creator A5061580583 @default.
• W2898053889 creator A5065587658 @default.
• W2898053889 creator A5066532132 @default.
• W2898053889 date "2018-10-14" @default.
• W2898053889 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2898053889 title "Comparison of supra-arch in situ fenestration and chimney techniques for aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery" @default.
• W2898053889 cites W1976316493 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W1991646550 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2003708032 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2004717710 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2009943105 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2014252481 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2057282579 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2061336618 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2068893060 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2080266844 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2080594780 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2092728343 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2127762864 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2130007655 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2139834785 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2144384223 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2150019000 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2158623072 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2168379788 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2208521269 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2368557776 @default.
• W2898053889 cites W2551807626 @default.
• W2898053889 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538118807013" @default.
• W2898053889 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30319067" @default.
• W2898053889 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2898053889 type Work @default.
• W2898053889 sameAs 2898053889 @default.
• W2898053889 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2898053889 countsByYear W28980538892020 @default.
• W2898053889 countsByYear W28980538892021 @default.
• W2898053889 countsByYear W28980538892022 @default.
• W2898053889 countsByYear W28980538892023 @default.
• W2898053889 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2898053889 hasAuthorship W2898053889A5004231602 @default.
• W2898053889 hasAuthorship W2898053889A5036085392 @default.
• W2898053889 hasAuthorship W2898053889A5049396596 @default.
• W2898053889 hasAuthorship W2898053889A5060757292 @default.
• W2898053889 hasAuthorship W2898053889A5061580583 @default.
• W2898053889 hasAuthorship W2898053889A5065587658 @default.
• W2898053889 hasAuthorship W2898053889A5066532132 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C2779980429 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C2781072225 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C2781285907 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C2911061479 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C126838900 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C141071460 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C2775862295 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C2779980429 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C2781072225 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C2781285907 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C2911061479 @default.
• W2898053889 hasConceptScore W2898053889C71924100 @default.
• W2898053889 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2898053889 hasLocation W28980538891 @default.
• W2898053889 hasLocation W28980538892 @default.
• W2898053889 hasOpenAccess W2898053889 @default.
• W2898053889 hasPrimaryLocation W28980538891 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W1527696228 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W1583973575 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W168152985 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W2094089384 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W2413524820 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W2416725848 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W2914276787 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W293831187 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W2963230384 @default.
• W2898053889 hasRelatedWork W3158032444 @default.
• W2898053889 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2898053889 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2898053889 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2898053889 magId "2898053889" @default.
• W2898053889 workType "article" @default.