FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2898075379> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2898075379 abstract "INTRODUCTION: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus(GDM) is defined as “carbohydrate intolerance of variable severity that is first diagnosed during present pregnancy, regardless of the need for insulin or persistence of the diabetic state after delivery”. Diabetes Mellitus is the most common disorder of pregnancy, although the prevalence can be as high as 14% in high risk groups. When the implications of untreated GDM are considered, including the peripartum risks (like macrosomia, hyperbilirubinemia, operative delivery, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma), higher incidence of childhood obesity and longer term risk of type 2 diabetes in mother and offspring, a strong case can be made for effective screening and diagnostic tests in Indian population. The Fifth International Conference on GDM recommended grouping of pregnant women based on risk factors and two step or one step testing for diagnosis of GDM. The testing for GDM at the earliest and by appropriate method identifies those women who need treatment with either diet alone or a combination of diet and insulin therapy. This results in prevention of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology of diabetes in pregnancy is changing every day. The evidence for clinical management, and the consequences on how to detect, manages and follow up diabetes in pregnancy should receive top priority in future.AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To Compare screening of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by Diabetes In Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) recommended 75g oral glucose challenge test with 50g oral glucose challenge test.METHODS AND MATERIALS: A detailed history from antenatal patients was taken to reveal all risk factors. The Procedure of the study was explained and required consent for the study was taken. Examination of the patients was done and all relevant data was obtained. Pregnant women at 24-28 weeks gestation were tested with 50g oral glucose load or 75g oral glucose load, at random. Patients under GCT group were given 50g of oral glucose dissolved in 200ml water, irrespective of last meal and 1 hour venous blood sample was collected. If they test to be positive (>/= 140mg/dl), they were confirmed with 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test using ADA (American Diabetes Association) criteria. Patients under DIPSI group were given 75g of oral glucose, irrespective of last meal, following which 2 hour venous sample was collected. Blood glucose was tested by GOD-POD method method. Doagnosis of GDM was made when the plasma glucose value exceeds 140mg/dL. Patients diagnosed to be GDM were treated appropriately and followed up postnatally.RESULTS: A total of 1000 antenatal patients were studied. Out of 500 patients in each group, the incidence of GDM was 9% in GCT group and 12.5% in DIPSI group. In our study it was found that the deranged value of glucose tolerance was found maximum in 21-25 years age group. The incidence of abnormal glucose tolerance was found to be on the higher side in the multiparous women (66.66% in both the groups) when compared to primigravidas. Incidence of GDM was maximum in BMI of > 25kg/m2 group (73.33% in GCT group and 36% in DIPSI group). The percent of patients with risks factors in present pregnancy with abnormal glucose tolerance was 31.2% in GCT group and 36% in DIPSI group. 55.55% of patients in GCT group and 49.99% of patients in DIPSI group had positive family history of diabetes. Most of the patients delivered at term in our study. The common mode of delivery in both groups was LSCS with common indications like fetal distress and previous LSCS. Majority of babies weighed between 2.5 to 4 kg in both the groups. Among GDM patients 16.66% were treated with meal plan and 83.33% with insulin in GCT group and 25% with meal plan and 75% with insulin in DIPSI group. GCT has only 95% specificity when compared to DIPSI hence DIPSI being a single step procedure it is simple and feasible method for screening of GDM. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, as a high prevalence rate was obtained in our study, a simpler, accurate and quicker method of screening and diagnosis like the one step 75g oral glucose challenge test by the DIPSI method, should be performed in all hospitals as routine antenatal procedure for earlier detection and treatment of patients with GDM." @default.
• W2898075379 created "2018-10-26" @default.
• W2898075379 creator A5048871158 @default.
• W2898075379 date "2016-04-01" @default.
• W2898075379 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2898075379 title "Comparative study between DIPSI and GCT for screening of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus" @default.
• W2898075379 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2898075379 type Work @default.
• W2898075379 sameAs 2898075379 @default.
• W2898075379 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2898075379 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2898075379 hasAuthorship W2898075379A5048871158 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C112672928 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C2779434492 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C46973012 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C112672928 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C120665830 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C121332964 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C131872663 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C134018914 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C187212893 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C2779234561 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C2779434492 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C2908647359 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C46973012 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C54355233 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C555293320 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C61511704 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C71924100 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C86803240 @default.
• W2898075379 hasConceptScore W2898075379C99454951 @default.
• W2898075379 hasLocation W28980753791 @default.
• W2898075379 hasOpenAccess W2898075379 @default.
• W2898075379 hasPrimaryLocation W28980753791 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W184883917 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W1930098694 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2057405825 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2085247536 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2095645088 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2160491309 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2182642439 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2194268721 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2267255450 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2352257400 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2356961731 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2359065801 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2365218196 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2369750994 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2550964577 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2608652073 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2796764077 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2914448101 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W2992440756 @default.
• W2898075379 hasRelatedWork W3137528104 @default.
• W2898075379 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2898075379 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2898075379 magId "2898075379" @default.
• W2898075379 workType "dissertation" @default.