FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W289885868> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W289885868 startingPage "5" @default.
• W289885868 abstract "ABSTRACTThis article presents a summary of the findings of a doctoral study (Rixon, 2011) that used the methodology of Conversation Analysis (CA) to explore talk and physical conduct in two different types of workshops in organizations, specifically a facilitated workshop and a training workshop. Very little empirical research on facilitator talk-in-interaction has been conducted, and it is this deficit which the doctoral thesis aimed to start addressing. A one and a half-day facilitated workshop and a one-day training workshop led by independent consultants and involving medium-sized groups were video recorded and audio recorded. The study was an CA study that pursued two main avenues of research enquiry. First, the institutionality of the workshops was investigated by demonstrating an aspect of the workshop conduct that is distinct from ordinary conversation, namely asymmetry in the participation roles between the parties to the interaction. The workshop leader(s) typically performed initiating actions and the workshop participants typically performed responding actions. Second, two particular tasks in the workshops were analyzed, specifically how the workshop leader managed the transitions into and out of activities performed by the participants in sub group participant configurations (i.e., individually, in pairs, in small groups). It is hoped that by drawing attention to the interactional practices that workshop leaders engage in when leading workshops will help practitioners to reflect upon their practice and be more intentional. As the dataset was comprised of only two workshops, future research could seek to investigate additional instances of either or both types of workshops.KEYWORDSgroup facilitation, conversation analysis, talk, talk-in-interaction, facilitated workshop, training workshopIntroductionSeveral years ago, after participating in many chaired meetings in my job at a university, I discovered through attending a meeting of the Victorian Facilitators' Network (VFN) that there was another way of leading meetings - that of group facilitation. After observing the seemingly open and inviting language of the facilitator of this meeting, the linguist in me wondered, How is facilitation realized through language?In pursuit of answering this question, together with my husband Dr. Andrew Rixon and friend Viv McWaters, both facilitators, we invited facilitators to reflect on their language use in facilitation by means of an online reflective practice survey. Facilitators were asked if and what they understood by the term speaking and to list words and phrases that they used in their facilitation practice. Over one hundred facilitators from across the globe responded to the survey (Rixon, McWaters, & Rixon, 2006).Many respondents, in their descriptions of what it meant to speak facilitatively, mentioned asking questions. The majority of facilitators also viewed body language to be equally as important, if not more important, than spoken language in facilitation, and most respondents believed that the two should be congruent.After eliciting facilitators' perceptions of their language use in facilitation, I wondered, How is facilitation actually realized through talk and body language? Searching the literature, I was unable initially to find any empirical research specifically on language use in real-life facilitated sessions. In a publication of our research findings (Rixon, McWaters, & Rixon, 2006), we suggested that future research could analyse facilitators' language-in-use by performing audio and video recordings of live facilitated sessions. The doctoral thesis (Rixon, 2011) on which this article is based is one of the products of this future research.Literature reviewA. Institutional talkThere is a comparative lack of research on institutional interaction in generic office environments as compared to that in specialised workplace settings-such as a medical centre or a classroom-as in doctor-patient or teacher-student interactions. …" @default.
• W289885868 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W289885868 creator A5070508725 @default.
• W289885868 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W289885868 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W289885868 title "Talk-in-Interaction in Facilitated and Training Workshops in Organizations: A Summary of Findings from Conversation Analysis" @default.
• W289885868 cites W103927176 @default.
• W289885868 cites W1489070705 @default.
• W289885868 cites W1530821750 @default.
• W289885868 cites W1537652463 @default.
• W289885868 cites W1551221909 @default.
• W289885868 cites W1562475572 @default.
• W289885868 cites W1999480495 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2003651602 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2017392570 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2068687198 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2083192553 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2143423983 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2145265774 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2171043734 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2186938808 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2329395632 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2416765181 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2480934907 @default.
• W289885868 cites W276027012 @default.
• W289885868 cites W32308872 @default.
• W289885868 cites W618432483 @default.
• W289885868 cites W621106063 @default.
• W289885868 cites W2603621939 @default.
• W289885868 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W289885868 type Work @default.
• W289885868 sameAs 289885868 @default.
• W289885868 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W289885868 countsByYear W2898858682021 @default.
• W289885868 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W289885868 hasAuthorship W289885868A5070508725 @default.
• W289885868 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W289885868 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W289885868 hasConcept C2776831358 @default.
• W289885868 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
• W289885868 hasConcept C2780829048 @default.
• W289885868 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W289885868 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W289885868 hasConceptScore W289885868C15744967 @default.
• W289885868 hasConceptScore W289885868C19417346 @default.
• W289885868 hasConceptScore W289885868C2776831358 @default.
• W289885868 hasConceptScore W289885868C2777200299 @default.
• W289885868 hasConceptScore W289885868C2780829048 @default.
• W289885868 hasConceptScore W289885868C46312422 @default.
• W289885868 hasConceptScore W289885868C77805123 @default.
• W289885868 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W289885868 hasLocation W2898858681 @default.
• W289885868 hasOpenAccess W289885868 @default.
• W289885868 hasPrimaryLocation W2898858681 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W1507729963 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W1517687442 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W161981569 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2030085210 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2111246595 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2166427735 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2558378453 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2613324207 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2794181768 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2948332209 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2950276156 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2951453241 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W3033851189 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W3117893840 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W3187269791 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W3197709470 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W608667597 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2593824773 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2727002542 @default.
• W289885868 hasRelatedWork W2784438135 @default.
• W289885868 isParatext "false" @default.
• W289885868 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W289885868 magId "289885868" @default.
• W289885868 workType "article" @default.