Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2899004651> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 62 of
62
with 100 items per page.
- W2899004651 endingPage "12" @default.
- W2899004651 startingPage "6" @default.
- W2899004651 abstract "Context: The biopsy of cervix can be obtained by various methods with availability of newer modalities like loop electrode. Objectives: To compare the histo-pathological parameters and clinical outcome of cervical biopsy obtained using punch biopsy forceps versus loop electrode. Methods: Women attending OPD were screened for cervical pathology, and colposcopy was done for those who screened positive. Patients who required cervical biopsy after colposcopy were allocated into 2 group; one undergoing LEEP biopsy and other half biopsied with Punch forceps. During procedure patients were evaluated for the intra-op pain and bleeding and their severity. The histo- pathological diagnosis was carried out and the sample was studied for its size, adequacy, and presence of any thermal or crush artefacts. Result: The two methods of biopsy were comparable in intra-op parameters, except for the increased requirement for additional haemostasis in LEEP biopsy. There was no case of bleeding from biopsy site at the follow-up visit. LEEP biopsy was associated with continued vaginal discharge more often than punch biopsy. An adequate sample for histopathological diagnosis was obtained in 91.25% of all cases. The comparative findings were reflective of comparable efficacy of both methods in providing an acceptable tissue sample for diagnosis. Conclusion: After analysing and comparing the aforementioned parameters, we opined that neither method can be deemed clearly superior to the other as a cervical biopsy procedure.
 Keywords: Punch biopsy forceps; Loop electrode; Cervical biopsy." @default.
- W2899004651 created "2018-11-09" @default.
- W2899004651 creator A5045202999 @default.
- W2899004651 creator A5056926207 @default.
- W2899004651 creator A5060030453 @default.
- W2899004651 creator A5066577356 @default.
- W2899004651 date "2018-10-30" @default.
- W2899004651 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2899004651 title "COMPARISON OF CERVICAL BIOPSY USING PUNCH BIOPSY FORCEPS VERSUS LOOP ELECTRODE" @default.
- W2899004651 doi "https://doi.org/10.31878/ijcbr.2018.44.02" @default.
- W2899004651 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2899004651 type Work @default.
- W2899004651 sameAs 2899004651 @default.
- W2899004651 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2899004651 countsByYear W28990046512021 @default.
- W2899004651 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2899004651 hasAuthorship W2899004651A5045202999 @default.
- W2899004651 hasAuthorship W2899004651A5056926207 @default.
- W2899004651 hasAuthorship W2899004651A5060030453 @default.
- W2899004651 hasAuthorship W2899004651A5066577356 @default.
- W2899004651 hasBestOaLocation W28990046511 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C2776117191 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C2776914593 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C2777740455 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C2910165503 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C121608353 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C126322002 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C126838900 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C141071460 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C2775934546 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C2776117191 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C2776914593 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C2777740455 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C2778220009 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C2910165503 @default.
- W2899004651 hasConceptScore W2899004651C71924100 @default.
- W2899004651 hasLocation W28990046511 @default.
- W2899004651 hasOpenAccess W2899004651 @default.
- W2899004651 hasPrimaryLocation W28990046511 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W173260032 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W2043369216 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W2074044986 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W2280325417 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W2387231044 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W2402566951 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W2497334881 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W284963772 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W2899004651 @default.
- W2899004651 hasRelatedWork W4237566094 @default.
- W2899004651 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2899004651 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2899004651 magId "2899004651" @default.
- W2899004651 workType "article" @default.